Space Battleship 3d Model Free Download
Maybell Goodfriend
Inspired by the Japanese sci-fi film Space Battleship Yamato, the long-awaited, cutting-edge ship that appears in Star Blazers 2202, is finally available as a 1:1000 scale model as this remarkable Space Battleship Yamato Andromeda Movie Effect Version 1:1000 Scale Model Kit! Breathe life into the Andromeda via LED and SE units. The Wave Cannon utilizes a multi-LED that changes from red to blue to white, replicating highly realistic glimmering and sounds! The Wave Engine light also flickers on and off and emits sounds to recreate the atmosphere of the feature film. In this all-new design, the option to set the retractable equipment to open or closed lends added realism, and carrier-based aircraft are even included! Requires 3x "AA" batteries, not included. Ages 15 and up.
The Space Battleship Yamato Andromeda Movie 1:1000 Model Kit includes 4 Cosmo Tiger II carrier-based aircraft, a display stand, 9 runners, an LED and SE unit set, a foil sticker, a water-transfer decal, and an instruction manual.
Not your average hobby store!
Panda Hobby is the largest hobby shop in Canada to focus on Gundam and Japanese model kits.
Learn more about us and our story
READ HERE.
space battleship 3d model free download
Space Battleship 3d Model Free Download ✫✫✫ https://bltlly.com/2zDys2
My Space Battleship is a 400m long, 400m wide, 250m tall ship. It's hull plating is a really unusual combination. Kevlar base, with 3" Cera-tinum (Ceramic + Titanium) with a reflective coating on top. Then, a 5" yellow diamond main armor with amorphous metal on top. The armor will be segmented, grouped in a 3'-perimeter hexagon. It's weapons will be 3 forward-facing railguns firing RP-AP (rocket-propelled armor-piercing) shells. 4 torpedo ports, also forward-facing, each houses 7 plasma torpedoes, but it is not really plasma. It has a thermonuclear warhead that would have a shaped charge for extra damage. It has a center Ion Engine Cluster (IEC) with 2 side VASIMR engines held by airbrakes (wings), and a nuclear turbojet on top of the IEC. It is FTL-capable, using an Alcubierre-White warp drive to reach extremely high velocities. It also has a counter-balance drive to center the warp bubble. The VASIMR will maneuver the ship in sub-light and in FTL. It also uses CO2 lasers for point defense, and 2 special 3-barreled ion laser turrets for both defense and offense. It is all powered by a fusion cell near the core. It will crew 12 people. It can dock onto large carriers or spacedocks with ease with its extendable docking arm.
Project Orion was one of the most ambitious -- and radical -- spacecraft concepts ever developed. Central to the concept was substituting conventional chemical rockets with a string of low-yield nuclear bombs "spit" out the rear to create a series of powerful blast waves that would accelerate the spacecraft to high velocities.
The "piece de resistance" of the Orion development project was the Orion Battleship, a 10-story-tall spaceborne "doomsday" weapon that would carry more nuclear firepower than a nuclear submarine. Its proposed armaments included 500 20-megaton thermonuclear missiles, 3 naval Mk 5-inch gun turrets, at least six Casaba Howitzer nuclear directed-energy weapons systems and numerous 20-mm close-in weapons. Propulsion would consist of several thousand 5-kiloton nuclear pulse weapons (that would also serve as powerful EMP weapons if detonated in the upper atmosphere). Six "landing boats" were on board for use in crew transfer, resupply, emergency escape, etc.
Even battleships at sea have come out style with the development of all sorts of self guiding stuff. A single cheap rocket could switch it out. A few are still around for display, latest designs from the last centuries 30s and 40s.
Meh, it was more about aircraft carriers than guided weaponry. In fact, guided weaponry might kill (or already actually have killed) carriers and bring back surface combatants... which in turn might get battleship armour back if point defences outmatch missiles to a point railguns come into play as the main offensive weapon.
Then there's the sheer size of launch vehicle or alternatively, complexity of orbital resource gathering and manufacturing (if you plan to build this in space rather than launch it from the ground) required to get this beast to space. That's not exactly near future either.
It sounds like you need to peruse project rho ( _html/rocket/), it has a great section on the theory of space war in terms of known science and current/reasonably extrapolated technology. Also pay close attention to the sections on propulsion to learn more about the difficulties of delta-V, reaction mass, acceleration and manouverability etc.
Your thermonuclear shaped charges are actually quite a good choice and are backed up by real science (though personally I've never liked them). But your choice of things like number of "torpedo tubes", ammunition load, point defence etc. feels totally arbitrary. It feels like you are describing a WW2 battleship but with its systems replaced by sci-fi alternatives. Thats like designing a car by starting with a submarine, sticking wheels on it and asking if it seems like a good design for a car. (Sorry, I really like annoying analogies )
If you read through the various sections of project rho, you will start to form a new picture of what a "space battleship" (or indeed of what space war itself) might look like, and it will be radically different from your initial assumptions.
Also check out "Children of a Dead Earth", a space battleship simulator that tries very hard to be as realistic as possible, with lots of real maths and science. Its not perfect but it is pretty danged detailed.
Depends on how you define powerful. If you mean thrust power, you're right. Even relatively basic chemical engines can get into the Gigawatt range. You'd have to get a lot more thrust power, exhaust velocity and thrust, to do cooler things. That means you'll need beefy reactors and radiators. But before that gets developed, it could be used as a space tug for unmanned payloads to various points in cis-lunar space. It's perfectly fine to take weeks to get out there.
OP: There are quite a lot of far-future technologies in that proposal. But even so, space battleships don't make much sense. Essentially you could just use huge spaceships as slugs to obliterate the enemy. Put up a defense network in various orbits around your planet and such, and such a war might not be quite a MAD scenario. Confrontations between ships aren't likely, as adding weapons will hurt your mass ratio and spaceships are very easy to destroy.
Even as a space tug, VASIMR requires a heavy power supply and radiators. Even then, it can only deliver (at the outside optimistic best) a couple of hundred pounds (presuming we can develop a light enough power supply that doesn't require magic pixie dust).
Seriously, even it's capability as a tug is mostly hype.
That last bit is where most space war scenarios break down for me, especially if we're in a setting with FTL technology. The ability to deploy any kind of advanced starship engine requires the ability to harness very large quantities of energy - and having sufficient trust in your neighbours that those said quantities of energy won't be turned against you:
"Yeah we appreciate that it sounds a bit far fetched, Mr President but honestly - we've run the numbers and it all checks out. We just figured we'd best be telling you before launching a spacecraft powered by our leftover nuclear arsenal."
So once a civilization has developed the technology to build an FTL space battleship, not only have they managed to remain peaceful enough for long enough to avoid blowing their planet to bits with antimatter bombs but they also have the technology to essentially get rid of any meaningful reason to be fighting. Space is big - there's plenty of room and plenty of resources for everyone. The most diametrically opposed factions can - quite literally - never see each other again.
760c119bf3