Mozart Piano Music Download

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Elwanda Menhennett

unread,
Aug 5, 2024, 3:03:51 AM8/5/24
to bundmalimeaf
Islowed it down some in my variations to make the sixteenth notes more feasible to play. And I also took out the variations on the phrases Mozart did and put repeat signs in their place since I figured that I didn't need variations on 2 levels at once.

Of course, my Beethoven influence was almost inevitably going to show up in these variations and what better place than the Coda where I can really hammer home that this is the end of it. I made sure to use fragments of Mozart's theme in the coda though, so as to connect it to everything else in more than just the key.


It's a long time to see you post! This is for sure a pleasant and sweet music! I love your classical approach to the variation form. You mostly vary the theme by retaining all the core melodic notes and harmony, and changing the rhythm, texture and register.


Apart from the minore var. VI, I would like to have more change of keys as Luis noted. I would love to see more varieties on harmonic chords, e.g. you can add modal mixture, chord substitution or even change the cadance, e.g. substitute the the G major cadence to E minor through interupted cadence for a variation, begins the variation in different keys apart from g minor.


Actually I don't think this Beethovanian though since you do not use his motivic approach for variations. He likes to chop up the theme and vary the many elements in each of his variations, like in his Diabelli Variations and Eroica Variations.


For instance, besides the occasional different dynamic marking to start a variation, there was little in the way of dynamics in this one. The lack of slurs, staccato, hairpins, etc. makes it feel a little robotic at times.


Being more adventurous in going to other keys, ritardando to the slower sections, well placed rests to give the streams of notes in some variations better phrasing... these are all things I think your music could have benefitted from. Luckily, they're all easy fixes if you wanted to pursue this piece further.


I was just thinking Beethoven influence with the coda cause you know contrast of chords and octaves against melody and countermelody, contrast of rhythm, contrast of dynamics with the subito fortissimo.


I mean, the original theme had a pickup, and the first note in the measure afterwards feels like the downbeat, so I didn't really see much of a choice here, I felt the pickup was necessary, cause it's part of the theme and all.


Honestly, I wasn't even checking for parallel octaves. I only tend to do that when Baroque style counterpoint is my goal, like in a canon or in a Baroque style dance piece, or a fugue. In variations pieces and such, I tend not to check laboriously for parallel octaves cause I figure that


I do use slurs to indicate legato in strings and woodwinds. I've had a tendency to not do that for piano though, cause as a pianist, I myself play legato by default unless there's indications that it should be otherwise(staccato, repeated notes, slur over staccato to mean portato aka mezzo-staccato, performance practice for the piece(especially relevant in Bach), leaps that obviously can't be done legato(lots of that in Romantic Era repertoire), octave melodic statements(very common for me to see in Beethoven)). I'll play a Bach Allemande legato, just as I would a Mozart sonata or a Beethoven bagatelle or a Schubert impromptu, regardless of whether I see slurring or not and for as long as I don't see contrary indications(which I don't see slurring at all in Bach usually, minimal in Mozart left hand parts, Alberti Bass or otherwise, more so in Schubert, but plenty of non-slurred legato as well). When I do use slurs in piano parts, it's usually the long phrasing type, not the shorter legato type.


It's perfectly fine with the pickup, but if it's a pickup one beat should be reduced to have it, otherwise the time signature will be altered. For example you can change the last chord of b.126 to a quaver and the pickup to two semiquavers, then it will match the 3/4 time in the var. VII.


Actually it's a concern for a classical style piece, and it is more noticeable here since the texture is thinner. But it's completely fine if that's your preference! I prefer parallel 8ves to 5ths too, since it's more like octave doubling, but the sound of parallel fifths is folk and ancient for me.


But the slurs and staccato can clarify the articulations since other pianists have their deafult. For example in the opening theme, if the pianist is not familiar with the Magic Flute, then should he play legato or staccato for the leaps in b.1? I mean we are not living in the same age as Bach and Mozart, and clearer indications will definitely allow more easy access for others to play your music. For this computer rendition adding those details will also allow the mp3 to executed better!


This lecture addresses the history of the modern piano and its music. Undertaking a detailed discussion of the different forms of the piano from the early eighteenth through twentieth centuries, Professor Wright also shows how the instrument evolved through a variety of photographs and paintings. He further supplements the lecture by playing recordings that were made on the pianos actually owned by such composers as Mozart and Beethoven. The lecture ends with a guest piano performance by Yale undergraduate Daniel Schlossberg, Jr.


We start with Mozart because he was the first composer to switch from the harpsichord over to the piano. The harpsichord was the primary instrument, of course, of the Baroque period, as we said before, 1600 to 1750.


You got a chance I believe in section last time to deal with the harpsichord, and perhaps even play the harpsichord, and you remember that it produces this kind of tinkling, jangling effect. Right? So if you ever hear a tingling, jangling keyboard instrument on a test, what are you going to say about musical style? What period does it come from? Daniel.


Well, because in terms of the music of Beethoven here, the father wanted the son to be the next Wunderkind, right, the next child prodigy, the next Mozart. Why? Because money was to be made in that fashion. The Mozart family had certainly made enough of it that way. But eventually Beethoven broke free of this tyrannical environment in Bonn and established himself permanently in Vienna. Think about it. Bonn is at the very west end of the German-speaking lands; Vienna is off toward the east end of the German-speaking land. So he went all the way to the other side of it but Vienna, of course, was the musical capital of the world at that particular point.


All of these things allow for a bigger, more powerful instrument to be put into place. So this is a Graf, as I say, from the collection in Vienna. The range of the instrument is getting bigger; the sound of the instrument is getting bigger.


Most of the lectures and course material within Open Yale Courses are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license. Unless explicitly set forth in the applicable Credits section of a lecture, third-party content is not covered under the Creative Commons license. Please consult the Open Yale Courses Terms of Use for limitations and further explanations on the application of the Creative Commons license.


From the sublime to the ridiculous, it is known that Mozart had a great sense of humour. In one of his most tragic pieces, the finale of the C minor piano concerto, K 491, instead of writing repeat signs in the conventional manner, he wrote a little smiley face that looks back to where he wants the players to return. The autograph is in the library of the Royal College of Music, London, and when I was a student there I was given the rare privilege of handling the score (yes, I did have to wear gloves).


In this fortepiano recording, Kristian Bezuidenhout brings out the contrasts in the piece by playing the dotted rhythms sharply and the expressive elements with freedom. Notice how colourful his instrument is in the different registers.


Another unusual work is the Andante in F Major, K.616. It is the last of three works Mozart wrote during the final year of his life for a mechanical organ, or musical clock. Scholars believe it was commissioned by Count Joseph Deym von Strzitez, a Viennese aristocrat who owned several mechanical organs that were powered by clockwork, one of which played solemn music in a mausoleum dedicated to the memory of the late Field-Marshal Laudon.


Another little delight is the Adagio in C for Glass Harmonica, K. 356. The glass harmonica (or glass harp) was once a popular instrument (Beethoven, Donizetti, Richard Strauss and others wrote for it), before it fell out of fashion. Here is Alexander Lemeshev playing K. 356, but it can of course be played on a keyboard.


CHAMPAIGN, Ill. - Two and a half centuries after Mozart's birth, the versatile and prolific composer continues to attract new generations of listeners with his symphonies, operas, masses, sonatas, chamber music and concertos for piano and strings.


But it's the keyboard music - especially the works written during the mature phases of the composer's life, between 1775 and 1791 - that has most recently captured the attention of William Kinderman, a music professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The musicologist-author-pianist - himself a 21st-century study in versatility - presents fresh insights on the composer, his life and his work in a new book, "Mozart's Piano Music" (Oxford University Press).

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages