Soha, Thank you for getting this out. It is very helpful to have all that info in one place now.
On my end:
I've gotten inspired to try a different rhetoric for a proposal. I'm not trying to replace your draft-- I'm just following an urge to try to find a way to present the information I've come across during this month. And to try to be as clear as possible about what action could be taken based on that information.
"Bringing Honolulu's bicycle registration and theft prevention system in line with best practices
(and considering how best practices can be improved as well as adapted to our situation)"
is the title,
Situation:
Results:
Best Practices:
Our Proposal:
Action Plan:
are basically the headers for each sub section. Here's a link so you can see what i've got so far:
Ideally, I think, most of the supporting data and stories will be referenced in footnotes. . . I want to make it quick to read and quick to get an idea of what might be good to do next.
I also sent some questions to Seth at bikeindex (below).
I also feel like asking the cops about bike impoundment numbers and inviting them to present on theft-reduction efforts, outcomes, suggestions in the past year, since, evidently they have been setting up stings, impounding bikes and so on.
I need a break though.
Until next time!!
Colin
PS: I am planning to address the funding issue. There is no need to repeal the $15 excise tax on bicycles currently levied here. If you have looked at
http://www.bikewalkalliance.org/resources/benchmarking you will see that HI is far behind on how much funding we give to "active transportation" infrastructure and organization.
So, we could leave the current tax in place regressive and ugly though it is (it could bring in more activists who wonder about it), until we get the support to put something better in its place. People would only be paying it when then buy new bikes and perhaps when they buy second-hand bikes at stores.
------------------
Seth,I have a few more questions:
- (1) Do you recommend making bike registration via bikeindex.org mandatory for all newly sold bikes? Since Hawaii's current system is that way we have that opportunity here. I imagine that even in Walmart, the store employee could use a web-enabled computer to register each bike sold.
- However: what if the customer does not have an email address?
It seems that it might make more sense mandate that each store give people the option of registering their bike. . .
- (2) We have many transients here--Tourists, college students, snowbirds. Some may buy a cheap bike and then abandon it. If bikes are registered at sale and then abandoned, is there a way to still transfer ownership at some point? What if a bunch of abandoned bikes are rounded up on campus and then donated to a bicycle cooperative? How can the cooperative enable the transferring of the registration to the new owner?
If the owner of the bike is contacted via email and there is not a response for a certain length of time, it would seem that there should be some way of transferring the bike to someone new at that point. Can we have the option of setting that time period in our local committee? I've heard that in the Netherlands abandonded/impounded bikes have to be picked up in two weeks. That may be too short a time for us.
- (3) Is there a way to generate reports about bike theft trends in Hawaii? We would like to be able to target our efforts and measure progress, year by year, or even month by month.
- (4) It appears that location gets recorded when a bike is reported stolen, and so high-risk areas could be identified from that. Is that the case? How can we do that?
- (5) Would it also be possible to record how the bike was locked? (Ulock/cable/not sure/left unlocked, through frame or not).
Thank you for your help. We're presenting our proposal on Tuesday.
One more question:
If not, why not? I did read about your experiment with the TrakR. It does seem like it would be helpful to have an easy way for police and bystanders to scan large numbers of bikes quickly.
Thanks again!