As a general thing, when faced with two suboptimal choices like this,
I'd be tempted to do both ways and then report both (even if you focus
on one, mention the results from the other in the paper). As a
practical thing, having fewer sample might really speed up the search.
Of course, the optimal thing would be to simulate and test to see
which approach resulted in the best estimates by Brownie (and perhaps
other programs), but that could be a whole separate paper.
Best,
Brian
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "brownie-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to browni...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to brownie-user...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/brownie-users?hl=en
> .
>
------------------------------------------------------
Brian O'Meara
http://www.brianomeara.info
Assistant Prof.
Dept. Ecology & Evolutionary Biology
U. of Tennessee, Knoxville