Msm Tool V4.0.28 Download

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Terina

unread,
Aug 4, 2024, 8:11:01 PM8/4/24
to browacdreadez
Im using ubuntu.I had MongoDB v4.0.28 before and also some unimportant test-dbs on the drive. Then I installed Mongosh, and then I updated MongoDB to 5.0.6.Wenn I start mongosh, it says "Using MongoDB: 4.0.28"Should I do something ti make Mongosh to use MongoDB 5.0.6?Btw. apt list --installed looks like this:

MSM DOWNLOAD TOOL V4.0.28 is a Windows utility that helps you to flash the firmware on Oppo, Realme & OnePlus mobile devices. It also helps to repair many issues such as Stuck at bootloop, bypass FRP lock, remove pattern lock & password lock, Pattern lock, etc. Also, It comes with a simple user interface so it easy to use even for beginners. The new tool 10+ new Oppo and Realme phones.


Stock Firmware Flashing: It is the after-sales service tool so you can easily flash your Oppo & Realme phone in just one click. All you have to do is download the firmware and use it to flash the device.


Bypass FRP Lock: After the factory reset did you face the FRP lock problem on your phone. Then also the Oppo Flash tool helps to bypass FRP lock without following any complicated steps.


The Department of Energy (DOE) maintains a list of "toolbox" codes that have been evaluated against DOE Safety Software Quality Assurance (SSQA) requirements of DOE O 414.1D, Quality Assurance and the safety software guidance in DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide, Appendix B, Procedure for Adding or Revising Software to or Deleting Software from the DOE Safety Software Central Registry and accepted as toolbox codes. The toolbox codes are used by DOE contractors to perform calculations and to develop data used to establish the safety basis for DOE nuclear facilities and their operation, and to support the variety of safety analyses and safety evaluations developed for these facilities. The following is a list of specific versions of toolbox codes that comprise the DOE Safety Software Central Registry.


Prior to inclusion into the Central Registry an evaluation, sometimes referred to as a gap analysis, of each code is conducted to identify any "gaps" between the SSQA practices being followed and DOE's requirements and criteria for safety software. Code-specific guidance reports are developed where needed to identify applicable regimes in accident analysis, default inputs, and special conditions for using the toolbox codes for DOE applications. These documents as well as general information are available through the toolbox code links provided above.


The codes in the Central Registry were developed by other Federal Agencies (e.g., NOAA and NIST) or by DOE laboratories for other Federal Agencies (e.g., Nuclear Regulatory Commission). Access to the toolbox codes or their use is subject to agreements, conditions and restrictions established by the code owners or Federal agencies.


The Office of Quality Assurance and Nuclear Safety Management Programs (EHSS-32) is responsible for managing the Central Registry. However, the toolbox code owners are responsible for ensuring that the codes are maintained in accordance with established requirements. Newer versions of these toolbox codes representing major changes to codes are reviewed as necessary for inclusion in the Central Registry.


Use of the Central Registry toolbox codes is not mandatory. However, using the codes offers several advantages to the DOE and its contractors. Some of these advantages include: 1) the gap analysis evaluation performed provides valuable information on the code regarding application of SSQA requirements, 2) the evaluation extends beyond the DOE SSQA criteria to the review of the code's capability to produce verifiable and acceptable results, and 3) due to the established pedigree, further evaluation of the toolbox code by DOE and site contractors may be reduced in scope.


If other toolbox code versions are used, DOE sites should determine that the quality assurance level meets the DOE SSQA requirements and the applicable provisions of the site Quality Assurance Program (QAP).


The Department of Energy maintains a list of "toolbox" codes that have been evaluated against DOE Safety Software Quality Assurance (SSQA) requirements of DOE O 414.1D, Quality Assurance, and its safety software guidance, DOE G 414.1-4, and accepted as toolbox codes. The toolbox codes are used by DOE contractors to perform calculations and to develop data used to establish the safety basis for DOE nuclear facilities and their operation, and to support the variety of safety analyses and safety evaluations developed for these facilities. The following is a list of specific versions of toolbox codes that comprise the DOE Safety Software Central Registry.


Prior to inclusion into the Central Registry an evaluation, sometimes referred to as a gap analysis, of each code was conducted to identify any "gaps" between the SQA practices being allowed and DOE's requirements and criteria for safety software. Code-specific guidance reports are developed where needed to identify applicable regimes in accident analysis, default inputs, and special conditions for using the toolbox codes for DOE applications. These documents as well as general information are available through the toolbox code links provided above.


The codes in the Central Registry were mostly developed outside of DOE (e.g., in the private sector or other Federal agencies). Access to the toolbox codes or their use is subject to agreements, conditions and restrictions established by the code owners or Federal agencies.


The Office of Quality Assurance (AU-33) is responsible for managing the Safety Software Central Registry. However, the toolbox code owners are responsible for ensuring that the codes are maintained in accordance with established requirements. Newer versions of these toolbox codes representing major changes to codes are reviewed as necessary for inclusion in the Central Registry.


Use of the Central Registry toolbox codes is not mandatory. However, using the codes offers a number of advantages to the DOE and its contractors. Some of these advantages include: 1) the gap analysis evaluation performed provides valuable information on the code regarding application of SQA requirements, 2) the evaluation extends beyond the DOE safety software quality assurance criteria to the review of the code's capability to properly perform safety basis calculations, 3) the DOE specific guidance documents identify limitations and vulnerabilities not readily found in other code documentation, and 4) due to the established pedigree, assessments of the toolbox code by Field Office and site contractors may be reduced in scope.


yeah this was a pain , haha did this a few week ago and did not like it one bit. if it was just the commands but same messaging it would have been nice but there was a lot more depending on how complex your system is and it was really gross having too do it manual. the migration tool forced me to reclone my backup twice trying to use it. manual is so much faster.


The fprof module uses tracing to collect profiling data, hence there is noneed for special compilation of any module to be profiled. When it startstracing, fprof will erase all previous tracing in the node and set thenecessary trace flags on the profiling target processes as well as local calltrace on all functions in all loaded modules and all modules to be loaded.fprof disable all tracing in the node when it stops tracing.


fprof presents both own time that is, how much time a function hasused for its own execution, and accumulated time that is, includingcalled functions. All presented times are collected using tracetimestamps. fprof tries to collect CPU time timestamps, if the hostmachine OS supports it. Therefore, the times can be wallclock times andOS scheduling will randomly strike all called functions in apresumably fair way.


However, if the profiling time is short, and the host machine OS doesnot support high resolution CPU time measurements, a few OSschedulings can show up as ridiculously long execution times forfunctions doing practically nothing. As an example, it has beenobserved that a function that more or less just composing a tuple, wasrunning 100 times slower than normal. When tracing was repeated, theexecution time was normal.


Tracing: to a file. The trace data contains entries for functioncalls, returns to function, process scheduling, other processrelated events (for example spawn), and garbage collection. All traceentries are timestamped.


Profiling: the trace file is read, the execution call stack issimulated, and raw profile data is calculated from the simulated call stackand the trace timestamps. The profile data is stored in the fprof serverstate. During this step the trace data may be dumped in text format to file orconsole.


Analysing: the raw profile data is sorted, filtered and dumped intext format either to file or console. The text format intended to be bothreadable for a human reader, as well as parsable with the standard erlangparsing tools.


Since fprof sends trace data to afile, the runtime performancedegradation is minimized, but still far from negligible, especiallyfor programs that themselves use the filesystem heavily. Where thetrace file is placed is also important, for example, on Unix systems/tmp is usually a good choice since it is essentially a RAM disk,while any network-mounted disk is a bad idea.


The CNT column shows the total number of function calls that was found in thetrace. In the ACC column is the total time of the trace from first timestamp tolast. And in the OWN column is the sum of the execution time in functions foundin the trace, not including called functions. In this case it is very close tothe ACC time since the emulator had practically nothing to do exceptexecuting our test program.


The paragraphs are per default sorted in descending order of the ACC column forthe marked function. The calling list and called list within one paragraph arealso per default sorted in descending order of their ACC column.


The rows for the calling functions contain statistics for the markedfunction with the constraint that only the occasions when a call was made fromthe row's function to the marked function are accounted for.

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages