Project Vengeance

[Rosy Demorest]

ProjectVengeance, the project formerly dubbed The Big Six, has released its debut single. You can listen to the single "CUT. BLEED. REPEAT" below. The track was Written, Produced, and Mixed by Luke Fiadino and Mastered by Joel Wanasek.

THE BIG SIX have already had a rather storied history despite never having released any music yet. The group, made up of six notable names from within the deathcore genre was initially announced back in December 2022 and featured the vocalists from ATTILA, FIT FOR AN AUTOPSY, LORNA SHORE, LEFT TO SUFFER, TRAITORS and INFANT ANNIHILATOR.

Soon after the band was revealed, ATTILA frontman Chris Fronzak vacated the project and was replaced by SPITE vocalist Darius Tehrani. Not long after that, FIT FOR AN AUTOPSY vocalist Joe Badolato walked away from the project leaving the sextet without an actual sixth. No replacement for Badolato has been announced as of yet.

Now it seems THE BIG SIX have changed their name to PROJECT: VENGEANCE and have launched a new Instagram account under the new name. This could possibly be due to the group not finding a suitable replacement for Badolato or an attempt to completely rebrand.

How's it going, guys? So, for those of you that know, Project: Vengeance has devoured The Big Six. The Big Six is no longer a thing," says vocalist Will Ramos (Lorna Shore) in an Instagram Story post made around midnight, "and we got a song coming out, like, pretty much right now so click on the motherfucking link and get with it because you're gonna want to fucking slam your head in."

Ramos is one of five vocalists involved in the project, the others being Taylor Barber (Left to Suffer), Darius Tehrani (Spite), Dickie Allen (Infant Annihilator) and Tyler Shelton (Traitors). At first, Tehrani was not involved in the band, but was later added following the departure of Atilla's Chris Fronzak earlier this year. Shortly after, Fit For An Autopsy's Joe Badalato bowed out as well.

Meanwhile, you can catch Lorna Shore on a headlining tour that starts on March 30 or catch them as the support act on Mastodon and Gojira's co-headlining tour which begins on April 18. For tickets, head here.

LinkedIn and 3rd parties use essential and non-essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our Services, and to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off LinkedIn. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.

Rajesh Kumar: (interrupting, voice rising) I don't want to hear any more objections. This decision is final. Now, get back to work, or else you will be added to the list to be removed from the project.

Deteriorating Mental Health: The constant fear of Rajesh's retaliation took a toll on the mental health of his team members. Many felt anxious and stressed, leading to decreased morale and productivity.

Physical Health Impact: The pressure to work long hours and meet unrealistic expectations led to physical health issues among team members. Some experienced fatigue, insomnia, and increased susceptibility to illnesses due to a lack of proper rest and self-care.

Increased Turnover: The toxic work environment created by Rajesh's vengeful leadership style caused several team members to resign. High turnover further disrupted project timelines and team cohesion.

Decline in Performance: Despite working overtime, the team's performance continued to suffer. #Burnout and demotivation hindered their ability to focus and deliver quality work, exacerbating the project delays.

Negative Reputation: Rajesh's leadership style tarnished the reputation of the team and the organization. Word spread within the industry about the toxic work environment, making it challenging to attract and retain top talent.

Increased Stress and Anxiety: The sudden removal of team members without warning or explanation created a sense of uncertainty and fear among the remaining team members. They are left wondering who might be next and what they need to do to avoid a similar fate, leading to increased stress and anxiety.

Longer Work Hours for Remaining Team Members: With fewer team members available to handle the workload, those who remain on the project are forced to pick up the slack. They had to work longer hours and take on additional responsibilities, further exacerbating their stress and fatigue.

Loss of Trust and Collaboration: The secretive and punitive nature of Rajesh's actions eroded trust and collaboration within the team. Team members become wary of each other, fearing that their colleagues might throw them under the bus to save themselves from Rajesh's wrath.

Physical Exhaustion: The added pressure and workload took a toll on the physical health of the remaining team members. They started experiencing exhaustion, headaches, and other symptoms of burnout as they struggle to keep up with the demands of the project.

Negative Impact on Project Quality: With key team members abruptly removed from the project, the quality of the deliverables suffered. The remaining team members lacked the necessary expertise or bandwidth to maintain the project's original standards, leading to subpar results.

Vengeance in leadership is a dangerous path to tread. While it might seem satisfying in the short term to retaliate against perceived slights or wrongdoings, it often leads to long-term negative consequences for both the leader and the organization they lead.

The author, Suba Lakshminarasimhan, is an Executive Leadership Coach and a Systemic Team coach who supports organizations in building high-performance teams through coaching engagements. She intervenes via long-term one-on-one and group/team coaching to address various requirements, specifically in areas such as Workplace Conflicts, Emotional/Self-Management, and Holistic leadership growth.

At the beginning of The Batman, viewers are introduced to both the title character and the main antagonist in strikingly similar ways: men in the shadows waiting for their opportunity to do what they feel they were called to do.

For the Riddler, he emerges from the shadows of the apartment of a corrupt mayor, murdering him in his own living room as he watches a televised recording of himself debating another candidate who had been challenging his reelection.

As the Riddler executes an intricate plan to dispatch with all the corrupt figures in the Gotham government and police system, Batman is faced with what appears to be the first major test of his detective skills. The Riddler, as his name would suggest, leaves behind coded clues that point to his master scheme, but Batman and Sergeant Jim Gordon are constantly left one step behind.

It is at this moment that Batman begins to realize that his mission for vengeance has made it impossible to distinguish between him and those whose only goal is to simply expose corruption while on their way to destroying the city.

Immediately, Batman jumps to help the citizens below, cutting a wire that would have connected with floodwaters to electrocute them. Lighting a flare and pulling people out of the rubble, Batman leads a group of citizens to safety.

In criminal cases, we think about getting bad guys off of the streets. We think about victims being able to rest easy and begin a healing process in the knowledge that the person who perpetrated evil is getting what they deserve.

In civil cases, if something was taken from the victim, we see justice as it being returned to them or them otherwise receiving compensation. Wherever there has been an injustice, the damage is sought to be undone at the expense of the offending party.

To be sure, this is part of justice. Just retribution is rendered to offending parties, in order to right the specific wrong, as well as to serve as a deterrent against others who would be tempted to commit a similar offense.

This is why God placed such an emphasis on welcoming the stranger and the immigrant when he set forth a vision for justice in the Old Testament law. These types of people were commonly oppressed and enslaved in the ancient world, but justice meant seeking their flourishing.

This is also why God called for the canceling of debts after a certain number of years. He was for the flourishing of the debtors. This is why he instituted laws whereby farmers would not circle back to pick up every bit of the harvest as they reaped their fields. He was for the flourishing of those who lacked resources and would come to glean from what had been left.

This is even why God instituted a law about allowing land to rest from farming every seventh year. God knew that if they did so, the land would be able to flourish, and by extension, the people would be able to flourish.

This kind of ethic extended into the New Testament when the apostles placed an emphasis on the church caring for orphans and widows. In the first century, those without a patriarch were often doomed to poverty. But since God was for their flourishing, he instructed his people to likewise be for their flourishing.

3a8082e126