Process Monitor is an advanced monitoring tool for Windows that showsreal-time file system, Registry and process/thread activity. It combinesthe features of two legacy Sysinternals utilities, Filemon andRegmon, and adds an extensive list of enhancements including rich andnon-destructive filtering, comprehensive event properties such as sessionIDs and user names, reliable process information, full thread stackswith integrated symbol support for each operation, simultaneous loggingto a file, and much more. Its uniquely powerful features will makeProcess Monitor a core utility in your system troubleshooting andmalware hunting toolkit.
A similar linux option (this one doesn't need CONFIG_TASKSTATS), given a process and file descriptor, you can track the file descriptor's offset in /proc/PID/fdinfo/FD (the pos: field). Here's a toy script that shows this:
use lsof to monitor a processes fd offsetsnot exactly lightweight, but multi-platform, and you can start it on any long-running process after the fact, which you cannot do with pv (it's not pretty either, since lsof refuses to give both the size and offset in one go)
Update: someone has gone to the trouble of writing a general purpose transfer monitor tool cv for use with coreutils commands on Linux. It uses similar logic to the /proc fdinfo approach (as demonstrated in the shell hack above). It also has a background mode where it scans /proc and reports on transfers in progress as it finds them. See related question Is it possible to see cp speed and percent copied?
There is also conky. It is not a process monitor, but system monitor which can show quite a lot of information about your system with quite many different themes. Plus it is light and done specifically for Linux. Additional themes you could download from here.
Process Monitor is for monitoring system calls (such as file creation or writes), while Process Explorer is for monitoring process status (which is like System Monitor). I'm asking for the former, not the latter. :-)
The grandaddy of all process monitors is top, and many system monitoring tools are called top. For example, there's iotop to watch disk I/O, atop for a bunch of system resources, powertop for power consumption.
I am running a VNC server on Linux and a TightVNC viewer (ver.1.3.10 from 2/10/2009) on Windows with 2 monitors attached to it. I would like to have a full-screen session on both monitors at the same time, but whenever I do that, my full-screen always uses only one monitor.
(In regular, not full-screen mode, it is easy - just run the VNC server with double desktop size and stretch the window on the local machine across both monitors. It's the full-screen mode that I cannot make work.)
tightVNC 2.5.X and even pre 2.5 supports multi monitor.When you connect, you get a huge virtual monitor.However, this is also has disadvantages.UltaVNC (Tho when I tried it, was buggy in this area) allows you to connect to one huge virtual monitor or just to 1 screen at a time. (With a button to cycle through them) TightVNC also plan to support such a feature.. (When , no idea)This feature is important as if you have large multi monitors and connecting over a reasonably slow link.. The screen updates are just to slow..Cutting down to one monitor to focus on is desirable.
Executing unix shell commands using PHPRunning shell commands using PHP scriptExecute a shell command through php and display it in browser?I have already referred to the above links. But, I'm experiencing an issue in displaying the linux shell command process in the browser.My linux command: top -n 1 and wanted to display them using php in the browser..
Ok, I see your problem Rana.There some shell commands in linux needed to be set along with the TERM enviroment variable.top is one of them.In addition -b flag must be used in order to get the result from the output buffer, that in this case is the terminal...Try this code:
Customize Azure Storage Explorer to meet your needs. For example, use the Azure Data Factory extension to move data from other cloud storage services, such as AWS S3, to Azure Storage. Add the Azure App Configuration extension to your storage explorer to manage your application settings and feature flags in one place.
I solved this problem (on my 4k monitor 31.5") by keeping it 100% scaling, but increasing the system font to 30% using the command (adjust the factor for your needs, the effect is visible immediately):
Monitor, analyze, diagnose, and optimize database performance and data ops that drive your business-critical applications. Unify on-premises and cloud database visibility, control, and management with streamlined monitoring, mapping, data lineage, data integration, and tuning across multiple vendors.
Ensure user experience with unified performance monitoring, tracing, and metrics across applications, clouds, and SaaS. Robust solutions offering rich visualization, synthetic and real user monitoring (RUM), and extensive log management, alerting, and analytics to expedite troubleshooting and reporting.
I've searched through the various support forums here and on other sites and have found that other users have experienced similar problems to mine, but I haven't found anyone with the same exact problem. I believe I read somewhere that using multiple monitors with different resolutions is not officially supported by Citrix, but I'm hoping someone has a work-around, as nothing I have found seems to solve my issue and the Citrix Workspace application is mostly useless for me at this point.
I have a Microsoft Surface Book running Windows 10 Pro with a native resolution of 3000x2000. In the display settings, I have the 'Change size of text, apps and other items' parameter within the 'Scale and Layout' section in the Display properties set to 200% for the primary display. I use a Surface Dock, which is connected to a full-size keyboard and mouse, portal SSD drive and two identical Viewsonic external LCD monitors.
Both monitors are running at a resolution of 1920x1080. In the display settings, I have the 'Change size of text, apps and other items' parameter within the 'Scale and Layout' section in the Display properties set to 100% for these two secondary displays. I have read elsewhere that one of the suggestions is to set the resolution of all monitors the same, but I do NOT want to change the native resolution on the Surface Book to match the secondary monitors and replacing those monitors simply isn't an option.
Our company runs several applications within the Citrix environment, so in addition to my normal desktop applications, there are several programs that I need to run from either a direct Citrix shortcut, or via Citrix remote desktop, which I believe is running Windows 7. The stand-alone Citrix applications that I run via direct shortcut stay windowed and running only on one monitor, as desired and expected. However, the remote desktop session always opens in full screen mode and spans across all three monitors, which is NOT what I want.
If I press the Shift-F2 keys, the Citrix desktop switches to windowed mode, allowing me to resize and move the window to just one monitor, but the desktop is messed up and unusable, presumably due to the difference in resolution and/or DPI. The start menu bar isn't positioned correctly and the mouse position is wrong, meaning the active area is 2-3 inches away from where I click. I usually have to force close the window in order to exit, as there's no way to click on the 'Start' menu. See screenshot1 attached.
Next, connect to your Cloud Desktop and then switch to Window mode. Once in Window mode, stretch the edges of the window so that you are spanning it across both external monitors and have almost full coverage of both monitors. Finally, switch to full screen mode and then logoff (don't disconnect) your Cloud Desktop session.
Alozzy - I have tried your suggested solution, but unfortunately it did not work for me. I was hopeful it would, as this is the first suggestion I have seen online that addresses the idea of essentially disabling the default display by closing the lid of the Surface Book. Unfortunatley, the behavior of the remote desktop is still the same... it always spans all three monitors as soon as I enable the Surface Book display.
One of my co-workers pointed out that once the desktop has finished loading and is running in windowed mode, I can right click on the window title bar at the top of the screen and select the 'Resize Session' option. I then select 'Custom' from the Desktop Size list and enter the resolution of the monitor I want to run the desktop on, in my case 1920x1080.
I can then drag this window to one of my external monitors and click the 'full screen' box in the upper right and it fits my external monitor screen perfectly, but still allows me to access my local desktop and task bar on all three monitors. The only drawback is that there appears to be no way to save these settings between sessions.
The problem mentioned about the screen opening in the 3 monitors i always had but always managed to press "SHIFT+F2", drag the desktop to the main window and then double click on the grey zone ate the top of the Citrix desktop to automatically resize it.
Hello cgrucelski ... experiencing a similar issue with 4 monitors and sometimes launch of an app will snap to primary monitor full screen as we want, other setups at different sites it stretch full screen across all 4 monitors. Curious to know if you ever got anywhere with this?
If you are using Citrix Workspace App on your personal workstation and are launching an application (Outlook, Adobe, Excel, Internet Explorer, etc) then the only activity that can be monitored is what you do within that application.
I have installed Splunk on a Linux box and is listening for incoming on 9997. Our linux boxes send its syslog to it and work fine.
The Windows boxes however do not send any event viewer logs. I installed SplunkForwarder on it and followed the prompts where I entered the Receiver server and port 9997. Also restarted the splunk service just in case.
What additional configurations are to be done to ensure Event Viewer logs/AD monitoring start to populate my Splunk sitting on the Linux box.
I'm able to telnet to 9997 from Windows to Linux so it is not an access issue.