Fwd: [Obi-devel] [bro-discuss] Re: Funding organizations (was - substituting for Alan)
Melanie Courtot
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Melanie Courtot <mcou...@gmail.com>
> Date: February 8, 2010 11:46:49 AM PST (CA)
> To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanrut...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Melissa Haendel <hae...@ohsu.edu>, "bro-
> dis...@googlegroups.com" <bro-d...@googlegroups.com>, OBI
> Developers <obi-...@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Obi-devel] [bro-discuss] Re: Funding organizations
> (was - substituting for Alan)
>
> It seems like there could be a lot of constructs made by default
> between material entities and roles, so could you expand on why in
> this case it would be better to have OBI_xxxxxxx funding role of NIH
> (I assume defined as organization NIH and has_role funding role?)
> rather than using OBI_yyyyyyy NIH and has_role OBI_zzzzzzz funding
> role directly?
>
> Melanie
>
>
> On 8-Feb-10, at 11:06 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>
>> That would be the plan.
>> One thing I've been wondering about is whether we should define and
>> annotate to the roles. I.e add NIH as organization - one ID. also
>> define funding role of NIH - another ID. The two would be related,
>> but
>> annotation would be to the second id when annotating NIH as funder.
>>
>> -Alan
>>
>> On Monday, February 8, 2010, Melissa Haendel <hae...@ohsu.edu>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> From the eagle-i perspective, virtually any organization can fund
>>> a research project, training program etc. Would it make more sense
>>> to define funding organization as is_a organization that has a
>>> funding_role?
>>> See also this related request:https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2894859&group_id=177891&atid=886178
>>> Which also discusses delineating research labs from service labs
>>> based on their roles.
>>> Thanks,Melissa
>>>
>>> On Feb 8, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Trish Whetzel wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Alan Ruttenberg <alanrut...@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The question on funding organizations is whether we consider them in
>>> scope and should therefore assign ids for them. In order to avoid
>>> issues around potential reasoning problems I suggest that they
>>> initially be placed in an imported file. We can deal with the
>>> question
>>> of how to package them for release
>>> at another time. I can create the file if we agree they are in
>>> scope.
>>>
>>> -Alan
>>> If the decision is that funding organizations are out of the scope
>>> of OBI, they may be in scope of BRO.
>>>
>>> Trish
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
>> Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in
>> the business
>> Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term
>> contracts
>> Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone
>> call away.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Obi-devel mailing list
>> Obi-...@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obi-devel
>
> ---
> Mélanie Courtot
> TFL- BCCRC
> 675 West 10th Avenue
> Vancouver, BC
> V5Z 1L3, Canada
>
>
>
>
---
Mélanie Courtot
TFL- BCCRC
675 West 10th Avenue
Vancouver, BC
V5Z 1L3, Canada