SOCRATES’ and KRL MARX’S UTOPIAS <https://www.facebook.com/ScienceCriticalThinkingAndSkepticism/photos/a.277045175735326.51805.274760745963769/639902279449612/?type=1&theater> But he was wrong in his assumptions that he could make someone t
Swamiji
SOCRATES’ and KRL MARX’S UTOPIAS
But he was wrong in his assumptions that he could make someone think, what actually he could never and he did never, so he was killed cold-bloodedly for he thought wrongly and egoistically. Those who, like Plato began thinking after coming to him and meeting him, actually they were in the habit of thinking before meeting him. So they discovered him to get fed in to their minds for thinking more logically, more judiciously, more scientifically and more materially just like a baby having good digestion power could steal more things from its mom's kitchen and eat them up without upsetting its stomach or intestines and get beaten from the mom after got discovered of stealing food and eating greedily, for its mother assumed about it to get sick of greedily eating. Socrates was just punished for his very wrong assumptions including his assumption of Aristocracy; a ruling system which could be run by honest and sincere people from the people's train like him; was a wrong assumption and immaterial and childish or innocent dream.
All people of the people's villages and localities could never be a Socrates or like the Socrates. This assumption that, an elected person from the people would be an empathetic, dedicated and sincere service provider for the people, if not an absolute wrong but surely a biggest wrong, was a day-dream, that Socrates had tamed in his mind as imagination of a beautiful happy and peaceful humanity of the lay people.
Also same kind of mental condition was there with Karl Marx and Angeles. About their imaginations of socialism, that would work as a ladder for their imaginary 'scientific communism' based on the killings of the bourgeois and ruling elitists was also a similarly utopian concept. The imagination that there after, the proletariat's captured ruling would be handed over to the middle classed academics and literates, eventually migrated or raised up from the proletariat class who would dedicate their lives in their class interest, is an innocent imagination. Like day dreamer Socrates, Marx and Angeles also schizophrenically hallucinated of a immaterial transition of the pro-proletariat academics to a state of mental situation, who would let the personal property complex deleted from their own mind-set, also they would let the mass to transit to a stateless, un-ruled paradise, named as Communistic State.
The use of term scientific doesn't make or prove something as scientific unless something is not proved by perpetual examinations and experiments. Using of scientific terminologies for anything, what one believes as right, in the very way of hindu, sikh, bauddha or jain professional story tellers, only could be named as foolish or fool-making.
In the similar way Marx began with Darwin's proposition of 'Natural Selection Theory' to push his imaginary Utopia of Communism via his dreamy socialism is also very similar to religious story telling. Believing of the country livers (villagers) as honest and empathetic people who would feel the pain and sorrow of their own people as their own and could think, act and also dedicate themselves for the well-being of their own people of their country by converting the monarchical anarchy to aristocracy was simply an imagination of a biblical paradise or qoranic jannat. Same is also about the belief of Karl Max that the proletariats are class conscious-honest people who would live and die for their proletariat class interest. And they, after snatching the ruling through bloody and massacred or genocided proletariat-class-revolution will, with all enthusiasm run from socialism to communistic paradise without any break. To convince the headless mass about his imaginary utopia as scientifically accurate and true, marx used all scientific terminologies in his socio-structural-ailment diagnosis and also in imagining his dreamy 'scientific communism', which is nothing but a religious utopia like RAM RAJYA.
It was attractive for the proletariats for it was providing a beautifully designed dream paradise of, “do that much as much you like and enjoy that much what you can” just in the mohammad’s way of fooling the mass in his proposition of islam. It was also attractive for the academized and growing middle class literates for they knew that marx had proposed a sure planning to snatch the ruling from the age-old occupants of the ruling and easily handing over to them to quench their enhanced craving of dominion on the fooled, proletariated and vulnerated mass.
Factually the big majority of the humans are basically destructive, jealous, un-sincere, selfish, dishonest and traitors by nature. And a very negligible number of rare personalities like Socrates or Marx born as well wishing thinkers for the humanity’s well-being, who could never be taken as the representatives of the whole humanity. Believing of the neighbourers as one's own-self (in the Socrates' way) is childish, innocent, irresponsible and a wrong assumption. But as nothing can be taken as an absolute so people like Socrates and Marx could be seen as the rarest exceptions. Imagining a ruling system on the basis of assumption of some good people can make it happen, leads a philosophy of social set-up to a sheer foolishness and nonsensical conditions.
So is also about the bi-product of Aristocracy termed as Democracy, is also a big nonsense and a treacherous fool-making system for the mass, the people at large.
I may be absolutely wrong but this comes to my unlearnt, savage and forest wandering vagabonds' mind.
Kindly pardon me for my flaws and oblige.
Cordially,
Swamiji
Science, Critical Thinking and Skepticism's photo.