You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Brighton Bitcoin
Nice to see some chit-chat again. Is "Brighton Bitcoin" still relevant as a name, or does anyone reckon it should be expanded to take blockchains (ETH, etc.) more generally into account?
.g
Luther Ivan Adams
unread,
Jul 20, 2016, 10:27:55 AM7/20/16
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Brighton Bitcoin
I don't see why the group shouldn't expand to include blockchains, it's all relevant in some way or other.
Graham
unread,
Jul 21, 2016, 4:55:30 PM7/21/16
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to brighton...@googlegroups.com
"Are you sure Sir? It *does* mean changing the lightbulb."
Or domain name. or not. But yeah, sounds like a good plan - I know there
are some ETH fans around too. Shout if you're on the list ;-)
.g
On 20/07/2016 15:27, 'Luther Ivan Adams' via Brighton Bitcoin wrote:
> I don't see why the group shouldn't expand to include blockchains, it's
> all relevant in some way or other.
>
>