Hi David:
Thanks for reaching out about this! We definitely need to flesh out our
chiller point implementation, and having a wide array of chiller systems
to help validate the design would be fantastic.
I've created a Brick issue to track this progress:
https://github.com/BrickSchema/Brick/issues/197 . I seeded it with the
initial point names that you mentioned. I think for the point names that
are relative (e.g. entering/leaving), we can use the Brick `isPointOf`
relationship to specify the context of that point. If you look at the
definitions of the Entering/Leaving temperature sensors that Erik
metnioned below, they both specify that they are relative to the
condenser. We may want to pull that part of the definition out so that
it is explicit in the Brick model (using `isPointOf`) rather than
relying on the textual definition.
Would you be able to add the list of points/equipment you have on the
Brick issue? We can start from there and eventually I can implement the
actual concepts in a future release.
To answer your question about namespaces: I think that these kinds of
common points for chiller systems should be added to the "official"
Brick namespace. Vendor- or product-specific points and equipment would
likely go into their own namespaces, but would link to the Brick
ontology definition so that their definitions are grounded as extensions
to Brick.
For specialized extensions, we are exploring a "Brick plugin" ecosystem
by which users can optionally pull in additional ontologies that help
them address a specific family of applications
(
https://github.com/gtfierro/brick-occupancy-extension/ is the current
example)
Best,
Gabe
> >> <
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/brickschema/1d332944-ad85-41cb-b6ac-bccb8b28098an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> >> .
> >>
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Brick User Forum (Unified Building Metadata Schema)" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
brickschema...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/brickschema/6bbaac3d-ce8c-49ba-8944-1025c24cfcc8n%40googlegroups.com.