FW: Planning Application Alert Hanbury Street

31 views
Skip to first unread message

Jackie Remfry

unread,
Feb 3, 2011, 7:27:37 AM2/3/11
to brickla...@googlegroups.com

 

 

 

I have just had some interesting information about planning objections. A new rule is in force at LBTH. You must have 22 or more individual letters of objection and/or a petition with more than 22 names on it before it is considered at committee. You cannot have the same names on the petition as have signed the letters of objection as they would only count as one objection not two. I am a trustee of SAFE Studios and this has come up against us in our fight to retain the studios.  

If you have less than 22 objectors a planning officer can make the decision and it will not go to committee.

Regards

Jackie Remfry

Manager

SsBA Community Trust/Poetry in Wood

Montefiore Centre

Hanbury Street

London E1 5HZ

020 7375 3933

-----Original Message-----
From: Sandy McCreery [mailto:sandy.m...@mac.com]
Sent:
02 February 2011 19:14
To: James Imrie
Cc: 'Sandy McCreery'; 'Jackie Remfry'; 'Robert O'Hanrahan'; 'John Vullo'; 'Shafiq MALIK'; lucyj...@me.com; 'Asfand Flat 2'; 'Richard Hoare'; pwi...@windlehair.com; 'Jennifer Donohue'; 'BOHDAN ANTONIW'; 'Celia Kekwick'; wimd...@aol.com; rashid...@live.co.uk; 'Craig Mason flat 3'; 'Kate Harrington'; siobhan...@hotmail.com; jil...@yahoo.co.uk; roge...@hotmail.co.uk; 'Patrick Hennessey'; 'Matthew Marchant'; 'Mark Bickerton'; 'Maria Papas'; 'William MacCormac'
Subject: Re: Planning
Application Alert Hanbury Street

 

For your information, this is our email objecting to the proposal:

 

 

Subject:   Objection to planning application no. PA/10/01617

From:      Sandy McCreery <sandy.m...@mac.com>

Date:        2 February 2011 18:43:08 GMT

To:           beth...@towerhamlets.gov.uk

Cc:          dr.develop...@towerhamlets.gov.uk

 

Re: 45 To 47 Hanbury Street, Brick Lane, London, E1. Erection of a basement plus six storey building to provide a 67 room hotel (Class C1) with ancillary bar and conference facilities on the ground floor. Application no. PA/10/01617.

 

 

Dear Beth Eite,

 

We wish to object to the above planning application on the basis that it constitutes a gross overdevelopment of the site. Constructing 3069 square metres on a site originally intended for two houses must define the very notion of 'overdevelopment.' The existing planning permission for a hotel granted in 2004 was, in our opinion, too large. To enlarge that by a further 35% is, frankly, outrageous.

 

We would point out that the precedents cited to support this over-development have been established by the applicant himself on his adjoining building at 49 Hanbury Street. In 2006 retrospective permission was sought in respect of a roof extension that had been erected there without planning permission. Now that roof extension is being used to justify a similar enlargement at 45-47 Hanbury Street. Similarly, the rear addition at 49 Hanbury Street is now taken to establish the rear building line at 45-47 Hanbury Street, even though that is a long way behind the original building line.

 

Judging from the Design and Impact Statement alone, it seems unlikely that the designer of this scheme has the experience or qualifications necessary for planning a building of this scale, particularly one that is open to the public. There is a vaguely comical disregard for the conservation area status of the site. Added to that, it is almost certainly impossible to squeeze a six storey building within the profile of the existing planning consent for a four storey building. Much of the ground floor and basement will be made up of windowless bunkers. Indeed we doubt the structural viability of this design, and whether it provides the ancillary spaces necessary for operating a 67 room hotel.

 

We must also draw attention to the inadequate consultation over this application. Although we will be directly overlooked and overshadowed by the proposed scheme, we did not receive any notification from Tower Hamlets council.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Alexander McCreery & Celia Kekwick

26 Woodseer Street

London E1 5HD

 

 

 

On 2 Feb 2011, at 16:00, James Imrie wrote:

 

So should we write to the development/ planning department at LBTH
dr.develop...@towerhamlets.gov.uk explaining our worry and dislike
to this application?

Development: Erection of a basement plus six storey building to provide a 67
room hotel (Class C1) with ancillary bar and conference facilities on the
ground floor.
Location:
45 To 47 Hanbury Street, Brick Lane, London, E1
Application No: PA/10/01617

Kind Regards,

James Imrie
New Business and Marketing Director
FIRST LONDON POWER LTD (FLP)
80 River Rd,
Barking,
IG11 0DS.
and
50 Brook Street,
London,
W1K 5DR.
Tel: +44 (0)20 8594 9853
Tel: +44 (0)20 8525 1333
Mob: +44(0)7802 58 22 88
Email: j...@firstlondonpower.com
www.firstlondonpower.com

This is non binding and Subject to; Contract and FLP's board approval.
This email, including attachments, includes confidential and/or proprietary
information, and may be used only by the person addressed.  In the case the
reader of this email is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is
prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please notify the
sender by replying to this message and delete this email immediately.

 

Lucy Rogers

unread,
Feb 3, 2011, 7:55:25 AM2/3/11
to brickla...@googlegroups.com
Dear Jackie,
I think this rule has always been in force, but people don't know about it.
Our objective should be to change it. Other councils say that only 2 letters ensures an application goes to committee.
We tried to get the rule included in the so-called 'Statement of Community Involvement' (!) to help people, but the council refused to do that.
Lucy 

William MacCormac

unread,
Feb 3, 2011, 9:44:50 AM2/3/11
to brickla...@googlegroups.com
I guess a light study has not been carried out either - and I havent had a reply from the architects to my request; I think they are buying time as its just a few days to the deadline. If I dont get a reply today I will try and get the plans printed off and get them looked at by MJP architects on monday morning. As I said, if we can show there is an issue with the construction or something legally hasnt been carried out before the planning decision can be made, this will hold up the process. I am sure that the developer wants this built by next summer to earn a fortune renting for the olympics, so if we can hold up work for just a few months then it may never get built

W
--
WMd studio

12 Woodseer Street
Spitalfields
London
E1 5HD
United Kingdom

M +44 (0)7899 767195
+44 (0)20 7392 8975
wi...@wmdlondon.com
www.wmdlondon.com



Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages