> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dual N-Back, Brain Training & Intelligence" group.
> To post to this group, send email to brain-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to brain-trainin...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/brain-training?hl=en.
>
>
On a biochemical level, creatine serves to buffer ATP levels.
(Creatine gets phosphorylated when ATP levels are high, then
phosphorylates ADP when ATP levels are low.) This means that muscle
cells and neurons can engage in high-energy-consumption activity for a
longer period of time before they run out of ATP. Intuitively,
concentrating and focusing seems to require some sort of "mental
energy", which may or may not be related to chemical energy as
embodied by glucose and ATP.
Here are a few articles to read:
Creatine supplementation reduces mental fatigue during mental
arithmetic (Watanabe et al, 2002):
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-0102(02)00007-X
Creatine improves intelligence in vegetarians (omnivores not tested)
(Rae et al., 2003):
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/270/1529/2147.short
Creatine ethyl ester supplementation improves cognitive performance
(Ling et a., 2009):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19773644
(This is the first time I've seen this article. If anyone has access
to a pdf of it, I would appreciate it. My library doesn't subscribe
to that journal.)
Creatine supplementation improves cognitive performance in the elderly
(McMorris et al., 2007):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17828627
However, not all studies have produced positive results:
Creatine supplementaiton does not improve cognitive function in young
adults (Rawson et al,. 2008)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.05.009
I think the Rawson study's methodology was poor, and that caused them
to get a negative result. My comments on the subject can be found here:
http://groups.google.com/group/brain-training/browse_thread/thread/fe4ee2f0c994e40e/5d5ca4de825f7187?lnk=gst%22#5d5ca4de825f7187
Jonathan
Besides, ADHD has a heritability of around 80%.[1] How can a disorder
which is 80% genetic be due to heavy metal poisoning?
[1] http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/289350-overview
Jonathan
http://www.springerlink.com/content/r431772151245355/
http://bio-medical.com/media/download/controlled_ADHD_NF_study.pdf
If you live in Southern California, I could do the therapy, since
that's my job. Otherwise, aapb.org and isnr.org have lists of
practitioners.
Jonathan
A protein rich diet is obviously more important than creatine supplementation. But assuming you are doing everything else right, creatine can offer a pretty significant boost in muscle/strength gains. I'm pretty muscular 6'3 at 219 pounds 7-9% bodyfat. Been working out forever and can def say working out with creatine helps me out a lot, assuming I have everything else in order. Just have to make sure you cycle. As to the adhd thing, the most promising thing I have read about is neurofeedback. Although I would highly suggest seeing a professional about it, I don't think programs like the ones transparentcorp(etc) work as well as advertised.
On Jan 8, 2011 8:56 AM, "KD Jones" <jello...@gmail.com> wrote:
BTW Jonathan - What neurofeedback methodology do you work with, and
what kind of effects/results have you seen? (If it's OK to ask.)
On Jan 7, 1:01 pm, Jonathan Toomim <jtoo...@jtoomim.org> wrote:
> Try neurofeedback.
>
> http://www...
All the studies I have seen seem to suggest that creatine helps mental functioning. Personally I don't notice any effects in my own supplementation, but how could i? With all the crap I do for my mental health its impossible for me to isolate any one thing. physically I can say it is the single most effective supplement I have ever taken. But I doubt that's what u want 2 hear.
On Jan 8, 2011 5:30 PM, "KD Jones" <jello...@gmail.com> wrote:
Please, folks... I've seen a LOT of professionals. A LOT. I'm 50
freaking years old, with a critical eye to my own experience. And I've
done neuro as well, the standard Lubar protocol and LENS, as I'd
mentioned.
So, please. Enough advice, though I appreciate the intent. I was
asking about creatine, with regard to specific research.
On Jan 8, 10:01 am, Jelani Sims <gouki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A protein rich diet is obviously more...
> On Jan 8, 2011 8:56 AM, "KD Jones" <jellocop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> BTW Jonathan - What neurofee...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dual N-Back, Brain Tr...
No
On Jan 8, 2011 6:56 PM, "ailambris" <aila...@gmail.com> wrote:
Isn't DNB biofeedback training?
On Jan 8, 2:51 pm, Jelani Sims <gouki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All the studies I have seen seem to su...
> On Jan 8, 2011 5:30 PM, "KD Jones" <jellocop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please, folks... I've seen a...
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dual N-Back, Brain Traini...
Others like pontus will probably spend 3 paragraphs explaining the difference. I personally don't have the paitience. Learn what biofeedback is, google should help.
On Jan 8, 2011 8:08 PM, "ailambris" <aila...@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't see how not.
On Jan 8, 4:08 pm, Jelani Sims <gouki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No
>
> On Jan 8, 2011 6:56 PM, "ailambris" <ailamb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Isn't DNB biofeedback trainin...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dual N-Back, Brain Tr...
Jonathan
Short answer: If you're worried about DHT, why not take a 5-alpha-
reductase inhibitor? That will reduce or block the conversion of T to
DHT. Saw palmetto is an over-the-counter herb which has this effect.
Keep in mind that lowering DHT is likely to have negative side
effects, such as a weaker libido, reduced confidence and
assertiveness, and worsened mood. It will also likely clear up your
skin (reduce the oiliness and acne).
> It's poor reasoning, I know, and it's only one study. But the prospect
> is scary and makes sense when you look at the effects that creatine
> has aside from greater ATP recycling. I don't think the mechanisms are
> fully understood.
Hey, it could be that the increased DHT synthesis is a result of
creatine's ATP buffering activity. When you change the concentrations
of basic metabolic molecules, it does all sorts of stuff, including
some stuff you wouldn't expect. For example, in women, alcohol
consumption increases testosterone concentrations, because alcohol
catabolism (i.e. decomposition) in the liver depletes NAD+ (and
replaces it with NADH, which can be used by mitochondria to produce
ATP), and NAD+ is also needed for the catabolism of testosterone.
However, in men, alcohol consumption decreases testosterone, because
alcohol also gets metabolized in the testes, and the depletion of NAD+
in the testes reduces the synthesis of testosterone.
> But now I'm questioning it's worth if it increases the risk of
> prostate cancer and, gasp, hair loss.
DHT does not change the risk of prostate cancer. Estrogens does not
change the risk of breast cancer. Cancers form when the DNA in a cell
gets mutated such that the genes that regulate cell division get
messed up and stuck in the "be fruitful and multiply" state. Those
mutations are not produced by hormones, they're produced by stuff like
benzene, X-rays, dioxins, asbestos, compounds in (tobacco) smoke, and
anything else found in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinogen. If
you get prostate (or breast) cancer, on the other hand, the presence
of certain sex hormones can accelerate their growth. But your hormone
levels don't matter until you get the cancer.
Yeah, the hair loss could be an issue. I don't have the alleles for
male-pattern baldness, so no matter how much DHT I have, I won't go
bald. However, if you expect that you do have those genes, keeping
DHT at normal or below-normal levels could prolong your days with a
full head of hair.
Anyway, bald guys still get laid. Many women even prefer it. A quick
search on OkCupid shows about as many women who claim to prefer bald
men as prefer non-bald men.
High DHT isn't something that concerns me. Actually, I would consider
a mild DHT increase for me to be a positive side effect. On the other
hand, I can see how people with male-pattern baldness genes or benign
prostate hypertrophy might be concerned about it. Still, I'm of the
opinion that (a) the cognitive effects are more important and helpful
than accelerated baldness is deleterious, and (b) baldness and high
DHT can be easily treated with finasteride or saw palmetto.
Jonathan
I agree that creatine transporter downregulation is undesirable and
should be minimized. I'll take a look at their hypothetical regimen
when I get a chance.
As for whether creatine supplementation would be able to produce
sustainable benefits, I'm optimistic. Here's how I think of it:
Assume that the creatine transporter is negatively regulated by
intracellular creatine concentrations. If supplementation of creatine
produces maintained downregulation of the creatine transporter, that
would imply that creatine supplementation produces a maintained
elevation of intracellular creatine concentrations; otherwise, if
creatine levels fell to or below baseline levels, the creatine
transporter downregulation would get reversed.
Anyway, I need to get back to work.
Jonathan