At Darden, where she formerly served as associate dean of the MBA program and as executive director of the Batten Institute, Jeanne works with both MBAs and executives in the areas of design thinking, innovation and leading growth. Her passion is exploring how organizations can engage employees at every level in thinking creatively about the design of powerful futures.
Jeanne M. Liedtka, OAM [1] (born March 2, 1955) is an American strategist and professor of business administration at the Darden School of the University of Virginia, particularly known for her work on strategic thinking, design thinking and organic growth.
Liedtka's work on design thinking is presented in her book, Designing for Growth: A design toolkit for managers, co-authored with Tim Ogilvie,[2] that won the 1800 CEO READ best management book of 2011.[3] Her recent research in design thinking is published in her two new books; Solving Problems with Design Thinking: Ten Stories of What Works, co-authored with Andrew King and Kevin Bennett;[4] and The Designing for Growth Field Book: A Step-by-Step Project Guide, co-authored with Tim Ogilvie and Rachel Brozenske [5] She has also published Design Thinking for the Greater Good: Innovation in the Social Sector, book aiming for design thinking in social field.
When the right tools and significant insight are applied to a work process, the combination can lead to game-changing improvements in how business is done. Total quality management served that purpose for manufacturing in the 1980s; the creative problem-solving design thinking offers does the same for innovation three decades later.
In Design Thinking for the Greater Good (Columbia University Press), co-authors Liedtka, Randy Salzman and Daisy Azer share 10 stories of the struggles and successes in fields such as health care, education and security and show how collaborative creativity can shake up even the most entrenched bureaucracies. The book provides a practical roadmap for readers to implement design thinking tools, which are well established in the commercial business world as a way to reframe problems, ideate solutions and iterate toward better answers.
Jeanne is a highly influential leader in accelerating the adoption of design thinking & human-centered design methods and helping "non-design thinkers" to understand their value. Her ongoing research focuses on the intersection of innovation and strategy, in particular the integration of design thinking into organizational problem solving processes.
Developing a better understanding of what is happening now and setting aside our own assumptions is a key attribute of design thinking. Concentrating on the present, immersing oneself in the here and now and gaining a deeper personal understanding of the issues involved might be difficult at first but it could determine whether or not we will be successful. Evaluating the present helps us to broaden, and in some instances, alter the definition of the problem and/or opportunity we want to address.
What is the business benefit of using design thinking in your organisation? I strongly believe that you would see more empathy, invention, and iteration. You would see teams working together, establishing a deep understanding of the needs, discovering new possibilities and using the solution only as a stepping stone to a better one. For me, one of the benefits of design thinking is that it creates a context and set of tools that help people from different parts of the business work together across differences.
How would we research the contribution of designi thinking? A @DesignAtDarden\u00a0working paper by Jeanne Liedtka on \u201cDesign Thinking: What it is and Why it Works\u201d from Jan. 2013 on \u201cDesign Thinking: \u00a0What it is and \u00a0Why it Works\u201d. \u00a0Discovered that Liedtka co-authored Designing For Growth:\u00a0A Design Thinking Toolkit for Managers with Tim Ogilvie, who said: \u201cI Did Not Invent Design Thinking (Honest)\u201c.\nHere\u2019s a quick outline of the Working Paper.\nIntroduction\nStep 1: \u00a0What is Design Thinking?\n
\n- Defining the Concept\n
- Intellectual Roots in Design Theory\n
- Design and Business Theory\n\nStep 2: \u00a0Is the Concept Valid?\n
\n- Examining Design Practices and Tools\n
- Conclusion: Convergent Validity Test\n
- Conclusion: Divergent Validity Test\n\nStep 3: \u00a0Conducting Research on Design Thinking\n
\n- A Starting Point\n\nExamining the Psychological Underpinning of Design Thinking in the Cognitive Bias Literature\n
\n- Challenges in Hypothesis Generation\n
- Challenges in Hypothesis Testing\n
- Dealing with Identified Dysfunctions\n
\n- In hypothesis generation, for decision makers who have difficulty seeing novel solutions and figuring out what users will value, researchers have identified a number of solutions. As we review these particular solutions that the cognitive bias literature recommends, they begin to allow us to generate some nascent hypotheses about design thinking\u2019s potential contribution.\n
- Remedy: Employ ethnography\n
- Hypothesis\n
- Remedy: Use stories versus data\n
- Remedy: Work with metaphor\n
- Hypothesis\n
- Remedy: Expose decision makers to divergent views\n
- In relation to hypothesis testing, we find a similar set of prescriptions, researchers suggest:\n
- Remedy: Create vivid and specific representations of the future\n
- Remedy: Talk about the details of what success and failure look like\n
- Hypothesis\n
- Remedy: Pay attention to emotions\n
- Hypothesis\n
- Remedy: Generate multiple options\n
- Hypothesis\n
- Remedy: Hold after action reviews with specifics\n
- Hypothesis\n\n\n\nStep 4: \u00a0Creating Testable Hypotheses Concerning the Contribution of Design Thinking\n
\n- Hypothesis 1 (H1): The use of a design-thinking approach that incorporates the tools of visualization, ethnography, ideating with a diverse group, and co-creation tools , will increase the novelty of the ideas surfaced during hypothesis generating processes by reducing the effects of the projection bias (the tendency to project the past onto the future).\n
- Hypothesis 2 (H2): The use of a design-thinking approach that incorporates the use of \u00a0ethnography, ideating with a diverse group, and co-creation tools will increase the value-creation potential of the ideas generated through the reduction of the egocentric empathy gap (the projection of one\u2019s own preferences onto others).\n
- Hypothesis 3 (H3): The use of a design-thinking approach that incorporates the use of ethnography, optionality, ideating with a diverse group, co-creation, and field experiments, \u00a0will result in the exploration and testing of more ideas by the reduction of the focusing illusion (over emphasizing particular elements), and the endowment effect (the attachment to first solutions).\n
- Hypothesis 4 (H4): The use of a design-thinking approach that incorporates visualization, co-creation, optionality, prototyping, assumption testing and field experiments will result in improved accuracy in the hypothesis testing process\u2019 ability to estimate the likely success of the new idea, \u00a0through the reduction of the endowment effect, the availability bias (the undervaluing of more novel ideas), \u00a0the hypotheses confirmation bias (overlooking disconfirming data), the planning fallacy (over-optimism), and the impact of time (in which distant ideas are less specific and thus harder to analyze).\n\nConclusion\nDownload \u201cDesign Thinking: What it is and Why it Works\u201d as http:\/\/batten.squarespace.com\/storage\/books-journals-articles\/DSWP%2013-01%20rev%202-1.docx from\u00a0Design@Darden \u2013 Academic Papers\u00a0http:\/\/batten.squarespace.com\/academic-papers\/.\n\n\n\t\t\n\t\t\t__ATA.cmd.push(function() \n\t\t\t\t__ATA.initVideoSlot('atatags-370373-656ca00405add', \n\t\t\t\t\tsectionId: '370373',\n\t\t\t\t\tformat: 'inread'\n\t\t\t\t);\n\t\t\t);\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\twindow._stq = window._stq [];\n\t\twindow._stq.push( [ 'extra', x_wordads_outbrain: 'widget_render_ar_1', , ] );\n\t#bandieuhoacuanphuc, #baoduongdieuhoaanphuc, #ban_dieu_hoa_cu_an_phuc, #bbqqueens, #bbqresource, #design-thinking, #grill, #ha_tuan_khang, #lapdieuhoaanhuc, #liedtka, #muadieuhoacu, #recipes, #seoconghuong, #signal_buiding, #smoker, #suadieuhoaanphuc, #testable-hypotheses, #trendy, #user_is_kingReplyLike this:Like Loading...\n\n\tRelated\n","permalink":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/2013\/08\/25\/design-thinking-what-it-is-and-why-it-works-jeanne-liedtka\/","unixtime":1377453192,"unixtimeModified":1377467714,"entryHeaderMeta":"","linkPages":"","footerEntryMeta":"","tagsRaw":"bandieuhoacuanphuc, baoduongdieuhoaanphuc, B\u00e1n_\u0111i\u1ec1u_h\u00f2a_c\u0169_An_Ph\u00fac, BBQQueens, BBQResource, design thinking, Grill, H\u00e0_Tu\u1ea5n_Khang, lapdieuhoaanhuc, liedtka, muadieuhoacu, Recipes, seoconghuong, Signal_buiding, Smoker, suadieuhoaanphuc, testable hypotheses, trendy, user_is_king","tagsArray":["label":"bandieuhoacuanphuc","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/bandieuhoacuanphuc\/","label":"baoduongdieuhoaanphuc","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/baoduongdieuhoaanphuc\/","label":"B\u00e1n_\u0111i\u1ec1u_h\u00f2a_c\u0169_An_Ph\u00fac","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/ban_dieu_hoa_cu_an_phuc\/","label":"BBQQueens","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/bbqqueens\/","label":"BBQResource","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/bbqresource\/","label":"design thinking","count":5,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/design-thinking\/","label":"Grill","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/grill\/","label":"H\u00e0_Tu\u1ea5n_Khang","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/ha_tuan_khang\/","label":"lapdieuhoaanhuc","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/lapdieuhoaanhuc\/","label":"liedtka","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/liedtka\/","label":"muadieuhoacu","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/muadieuhoacu\/","label":"Recipes","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/recipes\/","label":"seoconghuong","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/seoconghuong\/","label":"Signal_buiding","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/signal_buiding\/","label":"Smoker","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/smoker\/","label":"suadieuhoaanphuc","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/suadieuhoaanphuc\/","label":"testable hypotheses","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/testable-hypotheses\/","label":"trendy","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/trendy\/","label":"user_is_king","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/user_is_king\/"],"loginRedirectURL":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fingbrief.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F08%2F25%2Fdesign-thinking-what-it-is-and-why-it-works-jeanne-liedtka%2F","hasPrevPost":true,"prevPostTitle":"Systems Innovation Geoff Mulgan and Charlie Leadbeater January 2013 Nesta","prevPostURL":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/2013\/08\/23\/systems-innovation-mulgan-leadbeater-nesta\/","hasNextPost":true,"nextPostTitle":"The Need for T-shaped Students Steve Easterbrook Aug. 15, 2013 Serendipity","nextPostURL":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/2013\/09\/01\/the-need-for-t-shaped-students-steve-easterbrook-aug-15-2013-serendipity\/","commentsOpen":true,"is_xpost":false,"editURL":null,"postActions":"Post Actions
- Scroll
- Shortlink","comments":[],"postFormat":"standard","postMeta":"isSticky":false,"postTerms":"category":["label":"post","count":305,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/category\/post\/"],"post_tag":["label":"bandieuhoacuanphuc","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/bandieuhoacuanphuc\/","label":"baoduongdieuhoaanphuc","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/baoduongdieuhoaanphuc\/","label":"B\u00e1n_\u0111i\u1ec1u_h\u00f2a_c\u0169_An_Ph\u00fac","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/ban_dieu_hoa_cu_an_phuc\/","label":"BBQQueens","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/bbqqueens\/","label":"BBQResource","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/bbqresource\/","label":"design thinking","count":5,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/design-thinking\/","label":"Grill","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/grill\/","label":"H\u00e0_Tu\u1ea5n_Khang","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/ha_tuan_khang\/","label":"lapdieuhoaanhuc","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/lapdieuhoaanhuc\/","label":"liedtka","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/liedtka\/","label":"muadieuhoacu","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/muadieuhoacu\/","label":"Recipes","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/recipes\/","label":"seoconghuong","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/seoconghuong\/","label":"Signal_buiding","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/signal_buiding\/","label":"Smoker","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/smoker\/","label":"suadieuhoaanphuc","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/suadieuhoaanphuc\/","label":"testable hypotheses","count":1,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/testable-hypotheses\/","label":"trendy","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/trendy\/","label":"user_is_king","count":3,"link":"https:\/\/ingbrief.wordpress.com\/tag\/user_is_king\/"],"post_format":[],"pluginData":[],"isPage":false,"mentions":[],"mentionContext":"","isTrashed":false,"userLogin":"daviding","userNicename":"daviding"}]Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
aa06259810