Dvd Quality Vs Studio Quality

[Janyce Brits]

Itis well known in the Systems Engineering domain that poor-quality engineering items during the project concept and design phases lead to rework, extra costs, delays, and, severe consequences if not detected.

A tool to automate the routine quality inspection and analysis of different types of engineering items helps minimize the cost of quality inspections while increasing the consistency and overall quality of the projects.

Defects can be caused either by inadequate engineering decisions or by the incorrect representation of engineering information in requirements, models, etc. Automating the quality inspection activities will give engineers more time for better decision-making while providing means to detect and fix defects.

These metrics follow the CCC approach and include extensibility and customization features that enable increasing the number of metrics by using parameterizable metrics (metrics that can easily be configured by the end-users), custom-code metrics (metrics that can be coded by advanced end-users), and checklist-based metrics (which enable a manual-oriented inspection).

SES ENGINEERING Studio is a Software tool designed to manage the System of interest life cycle by integrating and interoperating the complete ecosystem of tools involved in its concept, development, production, utilization, support, and retirement. By becoming the Integration Hub, SES provides full technical management support (Configuration management, Traceability management, Conflict management, Quality management, Information management, Knowledge management, PLE, etc.) to an extended list of connectable tools allowing smart interoperability among them and complete life cycle support. The combination of connectivity to existing tools, interoperability among them, technical management digitalization for whatever connection, ontologies, a repository for synchronizing the sources of truth, provides a powerful system life cycle management solution with a strong REUSE approach.

Quality Studio specializes in high-quality audio recordings and expert post-production services, including Mixing and Mastering. Our versatile space is also available for band rehearsals, workshops, film sessions, music videos, and photo shoots. Discover the perfect environment to enhance your music and creativity at Quality Studio.

For some reason, when I upload a video file (.mp4) that I recorded on my laptop from Screencast-O-Matic Free Screen Recorder to Canvas Studio, the video quality is much lower than that of the original video file. There is also no option to change the quality on Canvas Studio. The settings menu does not appear on the video whatsoever.

The original video file quality is 768p (the resolution of my laptop that I recorded on) and it is 853 kb. But when I downloaded the Canvas Studio modified video, I saw that the video was 360p and 462 kb.

As a Canvas administrator, this often happens to me as well when I record a video in Studio. Try waiting for a day (or at least the next morning), and more than likely the video you added to you Studio library will have a much clearer picture. I think videos just need some additional time to process on the Studio server. It's a little frustrating at first, but it's good to know that videos look better the next day. I hope this helps a bit!

I printed this model in 3 different colours using my AMS

1 - Brown - Generic PLA Profile

2 - Black - Generic PLA Profile

3 - Eryone Tri Colour Silk PLA - Generic PLA Silk Profile

Note: my filament is dry, I store my filament in dry boxes, I have desiccant in my AMS and the AMS reports low humidity (its green and full bars)

The issue seems to be with overhangs, speed and cooling.

I checked and seen the stock PLA Silk has the aux part cooling fan set to 70%, and the cooling overhang thresholds to 50%, these are default and appear to be the same for the generic PLA profile. The only different I seen between the stock PLA and PLA Silk Profile was the max volumetric speed was set quite low 7.5mm.

And bambu if your watching: I would love to see the community feedback included in this thread added to the default profiles. I never really had this issue with my bed slinger, overhangs had to be pretty bad to cause issues and cura was pretty customizable. I assume were going to see allot of noobies entering the hobby and nothing can turn a new person off more then ugly prints. Myself im pretty disappoint in the bambu studio software, allot of features are missing or renamed making them confusing. Your wiki is great, no complaints there but if this comes down to say a speed or cooling issue this isnt something a new users is going to guess right out the gate. Perhaps add a (Quality) profile that prioritizes good looking prints over speed (assuming its speed) or consider cranking those fans up more aggressively even if it means the printer is a bit louder.

I just did a overhang test using the default 0.2mm profile, the print failed at 50% overhang, nozzle collided with the print. The quality begins to fall apart between 30 and 40% overhang. As shown in the pictures. Again these were default settings, AUX fan 70%, part cooling fan 100%. Generic PLA Profile.

Im starting to wonder if I have a belt tension issue? I have not touched them, factory set. Printer has 70 hours of use. The reason im thinking belts is because the part looks worse on the Y axis then the X axis. And I dont think its cooling because the worst side was the side facing the aux fan.

Did you try to put your finger on the tip of the nozzle while letting the fan blow at 100%?

It does seem, that the cooling does not aim at the nozzle. It seems the airflow is a bit too deep and also concentrates its flow behind the nozzle not at the center. Can someone confirm this?

Exactly and maybe thats the point why this speed setting doesnt help much. With other printers I dont have this problem at speeds around 30-80 mm/s on wall speed. I only have to reduce the speed for small parts. Also slowing down the print while maintaining this high temperature for faster printing is also the opposite of helpfull. Nearly all my PLA Filaments tend to curl on the X1C. The molten plastic gets dragged around leading to bad overhangs.

I tend to use this hollow pyramides as calibration tools to dial in my final retract, flow and temperature settings. They print beautifully on a good dialed printer (without z-hopping) , but its a big fight on this machine.

Im not sure if I can upload a video here, I may share a private youtube link instead. I also took a video, the part cooling fan below 50% is useless lol It does nothing. So basically if your printing with PLA just keep it cranked to 100%. I think thats the take away here. We gotta keep in mind the AUX fan too, speaking to X1 user. I believe there is sufficient cooling, sufficient air flow. I printed for years with a single 5015 blower fan in a open air frame and never had overhang issues so keep that in mind. P1P users? I cant say. I still think its sufficient but i could be wrong.

Thanks for the input, I think my last posts got a little sidetracked from the issue at hand, this isnt about how much of a overhang the machine can do, its about a failed print, multiple failed prints with overhangs around 25%. I just finished printing the speed benchy from the internal storage that has more overhang and got great results (See photo below) yet my print from a couple days ago, the one in my original post failed, terrible results. This is hopefully a software issue. I can replicate the problem, I have a friend who printed the same model on his x1 and didnt have the issue i had, I can show the issue doesnt exist with pre sliced models so yah, im lost lol.

Hey there, this seems pretty interesting. I will do some tests too. What I know right now is, that using 0.16 layer height will result in way better overhangs as lower heights, which should not be the case.

Quick recap:

I came to the forums seeking help with an issue I was having with overhangs and surface quality. I had multiple failed prints, the largest being the alien hand featured in my first post. I was using the default 0.12mm profile in Bambu Studio 01.07.00.65 on my X1 Carbon with AMS, only changes made to the profile were to infill.

The issue presented in overhangs, blobbing, poor surface quality on the outer layers.

I knew this model was able to be printed without supports, I had printed it before but not on this machine.

My X1 Carbon had less then 100 hours of print time, was only a week old. When I purchased and setup the unit I followed the instruction and was up and printing within the hour. Great experience out of box aside from some frustrating issues with the AMS and cardboard spools. Carboard spools you say? Thats a topic for another thread Lets keep on track.

2: If the functionality of the belts is like in the video, not only clean the rods but make sure that the IPA will reach the bearings in the tool head by moving it over the IPA repeatedly. After this, clean the rods make them wet with IPA again, and move the Tool Head over the IPA and clean the rods again. Continue to do this until there is no more black residue. At that point, you are sure the bearings are clean and the self-lubricating function works.

Step 4

Calibrate

Once your printer is back in its place, all hooked back up its time to calibrate it. Dont skip this step, the cleaning of the rods and re-tensioning of the belts changes how the printer mechanic behave with eachother, they need to be recalibrated.

To do this on you x1, using the printer screen go to Settings-Utilities-Calibration and ensure all 3 boxes are checked then hit strat calibration.

At this point walk away. Dont touch, dont open the door, dont lean on your wobbly table

You get the drift.

3a8082e126