Im a Sith Inquisitor, and I'd like to avoid getting light side points. However, sometimes when it seems that the choice I'm making is Sith-like, I end up getting light side points! Is there any way to know before clicking 1, 2, or 3 which choice will give you light side points and which will give you dark side points?
Thanks for the help, everyone! Well this kind of sucks...does this mean I have to mouse click EVERY conversation because without hovering with my mouse, I won't even know I am making a dark/light choice?
For example off the top of my head, in the quest with Seih-Roon or whatever as a Sith Inquisitor. The green monster thing in Naga Sadow's tomb. When you're talking to the Overseer who gives the meat, you decide whether to poison him or feed him and keep him alive. In this scenario it didn't show the symbols of Light or Dark side. I chose to poison him and kill him, and it gave me light side points. At the time it seemed like a Dark Side choice, and I was confused as to why I got light Side Points and why it didn't show the symbols. I checked the preferences and it shows that it displays symbol on mouseover.
I am new to julia and really enjoy using it for computational purposes in my math program. I started using Pluto.jl for homework and love it. I just installed v0.17.7 that includes support for dark mode. Is there a way to switch between light and dark mode?
I just noticed GitHub - chrisgrieser/obsidian-theme-design-utilities: Some Utilities and Quality-of-Life Features for Designers of Obsidian Themes has a single command for toggling dark and light mode that you can set as a hotkey.
There are a few other functions that are entirely part of my obsidian workflow but that are actually set globally in the Mac OS shortcut app. For example looking for a word in a local or online dictionary, internet search or setting timers. It very practical because those functions can also be used in other apps.
While working on my latest website, I started actually wondering if what I learned in grade school was true. I've been taught that programs like Word default to use a white background with black text because it's easier on the eyes than the old phosphorous displays which were always light-on-dark. However, I find more and more that it hurts much less for me to read light text on a dark background; my lenses feel like they're straining less, and irises can relax more due to the lower overall light level.
So is it true that dark-on-light is easier to read? Have we just been told this to make us believe that these programs are advanced or something like that? Was the change to dark-on-light made more to simulate ink-on-paper moreso than for visual comfort?
However, most studies have shown that dark characters on a light background are superior to light characters on a dark background (when the refresh rate is fairly high). For example, Bauer and Cavonius (1980) found that participants were 26% more accurate in reading text when they read it with dark characters on a light background.
People with astigmatism (aproximately 50% of the population) find it harder to read white text on black than black text on white. Part of this has to do with light levels: with a bright display (white background) the iris closes a bit more, decreasing the effect of the "deformed" lens; with a dark display (black background) the iris opens to receive more light and the deformation of the lens creates a much fuzzier focus at the eye.
I do hours and hours of editing and translating in front of a computer all day, and my experience is that for such text-heavy work, light text on a dark background (for me, either white or a very light green on a black background) leaves me less fatigued, noticing far less strain on the eyes. Doing such intensive, long editing and translating with dark text on a white background is like staring into a fluorescent light bulb all day. Of course, if you're just browsing around the Internet for briefer periods, it's enjoyable to see all the various design choices web besigners have made, and some of them are worthy of being called works of art, but for plain old drudgery, simple, retro light-on-dark seems superior to me.
With the current themes (see screenshot below), the Discourse word at the top is black, on the dark grey background, making it difficult to see the word.
When scrolling on topics the word becomes just the icon, but instead of a black icon, it now becomes white.
My theme setting:
Hello! Is there a way to have the heading logo change based on the dynamic background for the page? It seems silly that there is a dynamic header design option without the ability to implement at least a light and dark logo version.
Bumping this for the same issue. Dynamic header is a great feature except it only applies to text and buttons. It would be great to be able to upload dark and light logo options to update dynamically too!
I also have the added dilemma of wanting to use the gradient behind the nav on the homepage (as I'm using a video background), and then dynamic on all other pages.
pass: justlove
I still need help please, the homepage and about page work because they have dark headers (I uploaded a white logo). But on the events page this then gets lost, where ideally it would show a dark version of the logo.
Is there any chance of being able to change the dark colour, to a grey and not a solid black? I've been wanting this solution for ages and that code works a treat, but would just love if i could change to a grey colour. Thanks!
Thanks to -71-2-methods-to-swap-out-logos-colour-sections-and-specific-pages for the tip and cheat sheet on theme colors. Alternatively, you could switch out the logo graphic as described in the
spacesite.com link above.
Wondering if/how this code would work on my site? I have images in the header of all pages, so the white logo works as intended. However on the individual blog post pages, I cannot do that. So I had to give the pages a light color background so that the white logo will appear. I don't love this. I would prefer the blog pages were white background like the rest of the site. So is there a way to code so that each individual blog post would have a dark header area only (and then I can leave the rest of the page white)? Thank you!
I have figured out a different way, I have the reversed the standard logo with a darker colour, and only changed the homepage and some extra pages manually. This work perfect.
Thanks for your help.
Similar ask - I have a white logo for the website, but for the blog landing page and posts, I'd like to use a colour version of my logo. I've seen how to invert it, but would someone mind giving me the code to use a different image file? Thank you!!
-traits-of-a-successful-entrepreneur
Marketing emails look great for light mode but when the customer views the email in dark mode the entire design is thrown off. It would be nice if Hubspot supported the ability to control what emails looked like in both light and dark mode.
While this is only one factor many businesses are overlooking, I think dark mode is going to be around for a while and there should at least be a toggle to preview in dark mode - if not a separate version like the plain text editor.
I'm a huge fan of this idea! I'm also a person who uses dark mode, so can really appreciate how important it would be to enable conditional email content based on dark mode. This also makes me wonder if this is part of / the true reason image-laden emails never have very good click throughs... Is everyone out there on dark mode and we just don't know it? (See other dev idea: Dark Mode Email Stats)
3a8082e126