Hi guys,
Thanks for your precious effort.
I would say, let's wait for the Gaisler answer first. To have a C++11 compliant version of the compiler would save a lot of work. Moreover it would not prevent us from adding other C++11 construct in the code base.
Otherwise a possible strategy, already adopted for Android in the past, can be to provide a custom implementation of the missing C++11 construct (e.g, std::emplace(...)). This would require more work on the makefile side, to link the right function implementation, but less (or no) changes in the already existing code.
Again, I would wait for Gaisler, the we will see.
Meanwhile, thank you again. Update us, as soon as you can.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BOSP Development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bosp-devel+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.