What one man uses when traveling he shared

[jeagas68]

NOTICE - front side:

Non-Commercial - Non-Resident

Private Property

No Trespass

No Consent for Towing

Man Traveling on a Public Right of Way

No Voluntary Consent

No Voluntary Suretyship

No Voluntary Second Witness

All Rights and Remedies Reserved

Back side:

18 USC 31 (6)

Motor vehicle. - The term "motor vehicle" means every
description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn
by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the
highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and
property, or property or cargo.

NC Constitution

Article 1, Sec. 5 

Allegiance to the United States.

Every citizen of this State owes paramount allegiance to the Constitution and government of the United States, and no law or ordinance of the State in contravention or subversion thereof can have any binding force.

[Joe]

You are on North Carolina, are you not? It appears that Art. 1, Sec.
5 is some type of post-14th Amendment modification to the original NC
constitution. How do you explain to the armed agents that you do not
owe paramount allegiance to the United States because you have not
consented to become a "citizen of this State?"

On Apr 25, 11:02 am, jeagas68 <freezeropointene...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *NOTICE - front side:*

>
> Non-Commercial - Non-Resident
> Private Property
> No Trespass
> No Consent for Towing
> Man Traveling on a Public Right of Way
> No Voluntary Consent
> No Voluntary Suretyship
> No Voluntary Second Witness
>
> All Rights and Remedies Reserved
>

> *Back side:*

[jeagas68 (motla68)]

The point of posting was not as it applies to a common man, but as it

applies the to the corporate person, who tries to solicit you on the

side of the road.

What proof do they have that I am a citizen or any characterization of

person acting in commerce?

In the army field manuals it says quite clearly that it is the duty of

an inhabitant to seek peaceful pursuits. Who am i to stand in the

way of them charging themselves?

Look at it this way, if the BC was not to be used for identification

purposes and the SSN was not meant to be used for identification

purposes how is it the 2 of them put together amount to a proof

of identification?