Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

JBuilder 2006 downloads: still available ?

15 views
Skip to first unread message

simon

unread,
Oct 1, 2007, 3:22:44 PM10/1/07
to

I notice the downloads for JBuilder 2006 seem to have disappeared from the download area. Is this product (more specifically the free, foundation version) no longer available, or am I just looking in the wrong place ? Thanks for any light anyone can shed.


raide...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 12, 2007, 3:14:03 PM11/12/07
to
On Oct 1, 11:22 am, "simon" <s...@ing.iac.es> wrote:
> I notice the downloads forJBuilder2006seem to have disappeared from thedownloadarea. Is this product (more specifically the free, foundation version) no longer available, or am I just looking in the wrong place ? Thanks for any light anyone can shed.

hi are you able to obtain Jbuilder 2006 from borland? I cant find them
from borland or codegear site... all are 2007 version.

raide...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 24, 2008, 1:25:07 PM1/24/08
to
conquest. We must therefore conclude, and, after having examined her powers
in their effects, observe them in themselves, and see if she has a nature
and a grasp capable of laying hold of the truth.

74. A letter On the Foolishness of Human Knowledge and Philosophy.

This letter before Diversion.

Felix qui potuit... Nihil admirari.

280 kinds of sovereign good in Montaigne.

75. Part I, 1, 2, c. 1, section 4.[13]

Probability.--It will not be difficult to put the case a stage lower, and
make it appear ridiculous. To begin at the very beginning. What is more
absurd than to say that lifeless bodies have passions, fears, hatreds--that
insensible bodies, lifeless and incapable of life, have passions which
presuppose at least a sensitive soul to feel them, nay more, that the object
of their dread is the void? What is there in the void that could make them
afraid? Nothing is more shallow and ridiculous. This is not all; it is said
that they have in themselves a source of movement to shun the void. Have
they arms, legs, muscles, nerves?

76. To write against those who made too profound a study of science:
Descartes.

77. I cannot forgive Descartes. In all his philosophy he would have been
quite willing to dispense with God. But he had to make Him give a fillip to
set the world in motion; beyond this, he has no further need of God.

78. Descartes useless and uncertain.

79. Descartes.--We must say summarily: "This is made by figure and motion,"
for it is true. But to say what these are, and to compose the machine, is
ridiculous. For it is useless, uncertain, and painful. And were it true, we
do not think all Philosophy is worth one hour of pain.

80. How comes it that a cripple does not offend us, but that a fool does?
Because a cripple recognises that we walk straight, whereas a fool declares
that it is we who are silly; if it were not so, we should feel pity and not
anger.

Epictetus asks still more strongly: "Why are we not angry if we are told
that we have


0 new messages