Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

It can be broken

35 views
Skip to first unread message

James Miller

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 3:23:44 AM4/5/07
to

Great, just got my first Delphi 2007 catastrophic failure.

Oh well.

P.S. What was I doing? - Just editing a collection on the Structure
window. No, I am not going to put it in QC; chances that sysops
can reproduce this blow up are very slim.


Liz

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 5:20:04 AM4/5/07
to
James Miller wrote:

> P.S. What was I doing? - Just editing a collection on the Structure
> window. No, I am not going to put it in QC; chances that sysops
> can reproduce this blow up are very slim.

How will you know if you dont let them even try?

--
Liz the Brit
Delphi things I have released: http://www.xcalibur.co.uk/DelphiThings

David M

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 4:35:44 AM4/5/07
to
James Miller or was it TObject wrote,

Not going to give them a chance. Poor sport !

Cheers

D
David Moorhouse
Moorhouse Works ltd
www.moorhouse.co.nz

JED

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 5:29:02 AM4/5/07
to
James Miller wrote:

> Great, just got my first Delphi 2007 catastrophic failure.

Not even a callstack for the error?

--
TJSDialog - TaskDialog for other operating systems:
http://www.jed-software.com/jsd.htm
Visual Forms IDE Add In: http://www.jed-software.com/vf.htm

Blog: http://jedqc.blogspot.com

Dave Nottage [TeamB]

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 4:41:55 AM4/5/07
to
James Miller wrote:

> Just editing a collection on the Structure
> window.

What was the collection?

--
Dave Nottage [TeamB]

Fernando Madruga

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 8:06:21 AM4/5/07
to
Don't forget that, expanding that crash window, it's pretty easy to send
an Automated Incident Report. I didn't discover that until after a few
such windows and my curiosity took the best of me to expand that dialog! :)

Tom Corey

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 11:35:07 AM4/5/07
to
James Miller wrote:


Let's see, zero posting history, vague claim, refusal to substantiate.
Yeah. All kinds of impressed.

Mark Reichert

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 10:43:57 AM4/5/07
to
" Tom Corey" <omtay....@otmailhay.omcay> wrote in message
news:xn0f4lbab...@newsgroups.borland.com...

I think he's TObject.


Fernando Madruga

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 11:08:00 AM4/5/07
to

According to another post, he may be the same as TObject, so that's not
zero posting history if that's the case...

Tom Corey

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 12:44:04 PM4/5/07
to
Fernando Madruga wrote:

> According to another post, he may be the same as TObject, so that's
> not zero posting history if that's the case...

I see that now. Not exactly a huge credibility booster :)

James Miller

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 2:42:04 PM4/5/07
to

"Liz" <liz_want...@xcalibur.nospam.co.uk> wrote in message news:xn0f4lax...@newsgroups.borland.com...

> > P.S. What was I doing? - Just editing a collection on the Structure
> > window. No, I am not going to put it in QC; chances that sysops
> > can reproduce this blow up are very slim.

> How will you know if you dont let them even try?

Because even I have problems reproducing it.

It's not a simple act of editing the collection,
it is some kind of complex issue that is hard to track down.


James Miller

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 2:43:06 PM4/5/07
to

"Fernando Madruga" <Fernando...@POBox.com> wrote in message news:461510c4$1...@newsgroups.borland.com...

> According to another post, he may be the same as TObject, so that's not
> zero posting history if that's the case...

I don't know who you are talking about. But I hear that TObject is awesome.

:-)


Fernando Madruga

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 2:28:15 PM4/5/07
to
Not really! Pretty much everything descends from it, but in itself, he
serves no useful purpose! :)

James Miller

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 3:33:27 PM4/5/07
to

"Dave Nottage [TeamB]" <dav...@radsoft.com.au> wrote in message news:4614b65e$1...@newsgroups.borland.com...

> > Just editing a collection on the Structure
> > window.

> What was the collection?

It was a custom descendant from TCollection used as a property
of a component. The collection could be operated fine through
its custom property editor; but as soon as I tried to edit the collection
using the Structure window, the Delphi blew up.


Freddy

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 2:33:26 PM4/5/07
to
Haha and you have proven the point that a "real" name doesnt mean
credibility :)
That was fast!!!

;) - freddy


"James Miller" <noe...@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:46153500$1...@newsgroups.borland.com...

Fernando Madruga

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 2:37:20 PM4/5/07
to
Freddy wrote:
> Haha and you have proven the point that a "real" name doesnt mean
> credibility :)
> That was fast!!!

If we go that route, can you prove that your friends are whom they say
they are? Unless you've known them from early childhood (and even then
with some restrictions!), you can not truly say they are who they say
they are. However, it's easier to refer to them by the name they use
rather than to refer to them as some nos...@nowhere.com... Even if it's
a fake name, it makes dialog much easier! :)

Craig Stuntz [TeamB]

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 4:12:56 PM4/5/07
to
James Miller wrote:

> I don't know who you are talking about.

The guy who posts from the same IP address with the same newsreader
who also asks questions about custom subclasses of TCollectionItem.

You know, that guy.... :)

--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] · Vertex Systems Corp. · Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
Borland newsgroup denizen Sergio González has a new CD of
Irish music out, and it's good: http://tinyurl.com/7hgfr

Mark Reichert

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 3:31:13 PM4/5/07
to
"Craig Stuntz [TeamB]" <craig_...@nospam.please [a.k.a. acm.org]> wrote
in message news:4615...@newsgroups.borland.com...

> James Miller wrote:
>
>> I don't know who you are talking about.
>
> The guy who posts from the same IP address with the same newsreader
> who also asks questions about custom subclasses of TCollectionItem.

And posted this recently

http://groups.google.com/group/borland.public.delphi.non-technical/msg/db8f502b83846fae?hl=en&

In the Wake Up thread.


Liz

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 5:09:29 PM4/5/07
to
James Miller wrote:


> Because even I have problems reproducing it.
>
> It's not a simple act of editing the collection,
> it is some kind of complex issue that is hard to track down.

Sometimes it takes a few people to club together to actually nail the
exact circumstances, you should always feel you can put things in QC

Andre Kaufmann

unread,
Apr 6, 2007, 1:30:58 AM4/6/07
to
Liz wrote:
> James Miller wrote:
>
>
>> Because even I have problems reproducing it.
>>
>> It's not a simple act of editing the collection,
>> it is some kind of complex issue that is hard to track down.
>
> Sometimes it takes a few people to club together to actually nail the
> exact circumstances, you should always feel you can put things in QC

Sometimes it needs only a single crash dump to track down the problem.
Doesn't D2007 already write one ?

Andre

James Miller

unread,
Apr 6, 2007, 2:09:45 AM4/6/07
to

"JED" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message news:xn0f4lpcn...@newsgroups.borland.com...

> Not even a callstack for the error?

Will this help?

Faulting application bds.exe, version 11.0.2627.5503, faulting module kernel32.dll, version 5.2.3790.2756, fault address 0x00015e02.

Data:
0000: 41 70 70 6c 69 63 61 74 Applicat
0008: 69 6f 6e 20 46 61 69 6c ion Fail
0010: 75 72 65 20 20 62 64 73 ure bds
0018: 2e 65 78 65 20 31 31 2e .exe 11.
0020: 30 2e 32 36 32 37 2e 35 0.2627.5
0028: 35 30 33 20 69 6e 20 6b 503 in k
0030: 65 72 6e 65 6c 33 32 2e ernel32.
0038: 64 6c 6c 20 35 2e 32 2e dll 5.2.
0040: 33 37 39 30 2e 32 37 35 3790.275
0048: 36 20 61 74 20 6f 66 66 6 at off
0050: 73 65 74 20 30 30 30 31 set 0001
0058: 35 65 30 32 5e02


James Miller

unread,
Apr 6, 2007, 2:11:43 AM4/6/07
to
Also:

Application popup: bds.exe - Application Error : The exception unknown software exception (0x0eedfade) occurred in the application
at location 0x77e55e02.


Dave Nottage [TeamB]

unread,
Apr 6, 2007, 2:37:24 AM4/6/07
to
James Miller wrote:

> It was a custom descendant from TCollection used as a property
> of a component. The collection could be operated fine through
> its custom property editor; but as soon as I tried to edit the
> collection using the Structure window, the Delphi blew up.

Knowing which component/collection might help.

--
Dave Nottage [TeamB]

Liz

unread,
Apr 6, 2007, 4:11:12 AM4/6/07
to
Andre Kaufmann wrote:

> Sometimes it needs only a single crash dump to track down the
> problem. Doesn't D2007 already write one ?

Same as 2006, I think long as you click details the dumps there..

James Miller

unread,
Apr 6, 2007, 3:19:51 AM4/6/07
to

"JED" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message news:xn0f4lpcn...@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Not even a callstack for the error?

Oops. I did it again. This time I saved the callstack. Here it is:

[20DB8532]{designide100.bpl} StructureViewAPI.TStructureMenuItem.Click + $5E
[2000A455]{rtl100.bpl } System.@CheckAutoResult + $11
[20DB8532]{designide100.bpl} StructureViewAPI.TStructureMenuItem.Click + $5E
[20134C87]{vcl100.bpl } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[20135DE6]{vcl100.bpl } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[20135D35]{vcl100.bpl } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[20040DE4]{rtl100.bpl } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[20160EF8]{vcl100.bpl } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $FC
[20160F32]{vcl100.bpl } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[20161188]{vcl100.bpl } Forms.TApplication.Run + $CC
[00422971]{bds.exe } bds.bds (Line 196, "" + 7) + $2

If I find a way to reproduce this reliably, I will see if I can put somebody on it to make a QC report.


Chris Burrows

unread,
Apr 6, 2007, 6:51:37 AM4/6/07
to
"James Miller" <noe...@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:4615e499$1...@newsgroups.borland.com...

>
> Application popup: bds.exe - Application Error : The exception unknown
> software exception (0x0eedfade) occurred in the application at location
> 0x77e55e02.

This exception code is defined and referenced in
..\Source\RTL\Sys\System.Pas:

cDelphiException = $0EEDFADE;
...
cDelphiException { our magic exception code }


An explanation given in a earlier posting in the b.p.d.language.objectpascal
newsgroup (24 Apr
2000) by Steve Schafer (Team B) is:


<quote>
That particular exception is simply Delphi's own internal code for
identifying a Delphi exception. The fact that it escapes to the
outside indicates that something is wrong with Delphi's
exception-handling mechanism. There are three common scenarios:


1) The exception occurs before the exception-handling mechanism is in
place (e.g., in the initialization section of a unit)


2) The exception occurs after the exception-handling mechanism has
been shut down (e.g., in the finalization section of a unit)


3) The exception-handling mechanism has been corrupted in some way, or
was never there to begin with (which would be the case if the SysUtils
unit were not included in the EXE)


You can also get that exception code if an exception is raised inside
a DLL and not caught within the DLL code.
</unquote>


Chris Burrows
CFB Software
http://www.cfbsoftware.com/gpcp

James Miller

unread,
Apr 6, 2007, 1:39:57 PM4/6/07
to
Chris, thank you for that. Great info.
Perhaps we'll narrow this one down, after all.

Bruce McGee

unread,
Apr 6, 2007, 4:21:33 PM4/6/07
to
James Miller wrote:

> Oops. I did it again. This time I saved the callstack. Here it is:

Did you click "details" and send an automated incident report to
CodeGear?

--
Regards,
Bruce McGee
Glooscap Software

0 new messages