Builder C++ vs QT

[Cécile Goepfer]

Hi !

I'm trying to develop a GUI and I'm wavering between QT and C++ Builder.
As I've already begun developing a prototype with QT, I'd like to know if it would be a good idea to go
on with Builder instead of QT.
What would you recommend ?

thanks a lot

[Jonathan Arnold]

> I'm trying to develop a GUI and I'm wavering between QT and C++ Builder.

What, pray tell, is "QT"?

--
Jonathan Arnold C/C++/CBuilder Keen Advice:
http://www.keen.com/categories/categorylist_expand.asp?sid=5156620
Comprehensive C++Builder link site:
http://www.buddydog.org/C++Builder/c++builder.html

[Scott Heiman]

> What, pray tell, is "QT"?

A cross-platform GUI framework.

http://www.trolltech.com/

--
Regards,
Scott
http://members.cox.net/scottheiman/
(a valid e-mail address can be found on my home page)

[Adib Taraben]

I also tought about using QT as QT realy has UNICODE support.
But I will loose the RAD feature as I need an other GUI-builder
(QT-builder).
So I stopped at that point.
If you don't really need multiplatform or unicode choose CBuilder. It is
really RAD.

Adib.

[Ted Byers]

"Scott Heiman" <add...@home.page> wrote in message news:3c87a7e6_1@dnews...

> > What, pray tell, is "QT"?
>
> A cross-platform GUI framework.
>

Doesn't BCB6's CLX library use QT? If so, then it isn't a question of BCB
vs QT, but upgrading to BCB6.Right?

Cheers,

Ted

[Charles]

Hmm, why isnt QT Designer counting as a RAD ?

Borland doesnt come with the full QT feature modules unless you get
entriprise. And it Borland doesnt expose the lower level QT stuff (have to
hunt).

"Adib Taraben" <Tarab...@wige-data.de> wrote in message
news:3C887A70...@wige-data.de...