Article I read
William Roe
exact, have been reassigned to work on the Eclipse IDE and C++ integration.
Thus, it seems that C++ Builder X is desupported. I know the developer
field trial ended over 6 months ago.... I didn't even get a promised copy of
that release.
Can anyone from Borland comment???
Otherwise on November 1, 2005 I will move my entire development staff off of
ALL Borland tools. For example: I will move to java development to Oracle's
JDeveloper and will move C and C++ development to the Eclise CDT.
It is the lack of communication regarding C++ Builder X and not having an
update to C++ Builder 6 in three years that has left me irate. I did notice
that finally Builder 2006 is coming out... too little, too late, and only
supports windows.
Leo Siefert
>I read an article that all of the Borland C++ Builder X developers, 8 to be
>exact, have been reassigned to work on the Eclipse IDE and C++ integration.
Where did you hear that? If it's true, I find it quite encouraging to
find Borland working on integration of C++ into Eclipse. I always
thought that CDT left something to be desired and some Borland help
would be great IMO.
>Thus, it seems that C++ Builder X is desupported.
Well, it clearly is not the focus of their efforts right now.
>For example: I will move to java development to Oracle's
>JDeveloper and will move C and C++ development to the Eclise CDT.
You actually find Eclipse more suitable for C++ development than for
Java?
- Leo
Reid Thompson
moving to Oracle JDeveloper does nothing for you -- it is just a
rebranded Borland product.