[boost] Upcoming Boost.URL review

[Klemens Morgenstern via Boost]

This is a reminder that the boost.url review will start in a week on the
13th.

The source code can be found here https://github.com/CPPAlliance/url and
the documentation here https://master.url.cpp.al/ .

I am looking forward to plenty of reviews.

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

[Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost]

sob., 6 sie 2022 o 15:30 Klemens Morgenstern via Boost <
bo...@lists.boost.org> napisał(a):

> This is a reminder that the boost.url review will start in a week on the
> 13th.
>
> The source code can be found here https://github.com/CPPAlliance/url and
> the documentation here https://master.url.cpp.al/ .
>
> I am looking forward to plenty of reviews.
>

Thank you for the heads up. Two questions.

One. Are the sources or documentation under the provided links going to
change before the review starts?

Two. According to the process described in
https://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html the reviews can be only
submitted by the "boost mailing list members". Is this requirement still in
effect? If I wanted to encourage people from the outside of the Boost
community to write a review, is there any other way than to have them
subscribe to a Boost mailing list?

Regards,
&rzej;

[Peter Dimov via Boost]

Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
> Two. According to the process described in
> https://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html the reviews can be only
> submitted by the "boost mailing list members". Is this requirement still in
> effect? If I wanted to encourage people from the outside of the Boost
> community to write a review, is there any other way than to have them
> subscribe to a Boost mailing list?

Reviews can also be sent directly to the review manager.

[Vinnie Falco via Boost]

On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 8:22 AM Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost
<bo...@lists.boost.org> wrote:
> One. Are the sources or documentation under the provided links going to
> change before the review starts?

Absolutely, definitely, positively YES. I plan on improving things
(mostly documentation) right up until Friday August 12th, 11:59PM,
Pacific Standard Time. There are no meaningful code changes planned -
that's all done. But documentation work often surfaces the need to
modify javadocs (the comments preceding each member or free function),
which requires touching header files. And since example code in the
documentation and javadocs is also compiled, the test sources change.

Regards