Boojay Release?

11 views
Skip to first unread message

Dan

unread,
Apr 16, 2008, 2:39:50 PM4/16/08
to boojay
I have made a small attempt to search the web but I have found no
answers to my question, so here goes:
Have there been any boojay releases, or is it still in a development/
proof of concept phase?

I very much like the language, and would like to be able to use it to
do development for both the jvm and the .net runtime.

Any info is appreciated.

Dan

Klaus Wuestefeld

unread,
Apr 16, 2008, 5:58:11 PM4/16/08
to boo...@googlegroups.com
Me too.

TreeForm

unread,
Apr 17, 2008, 1:52:00 PM4/17/08
to boojay
so would i...

On Apr 16, 2:58 pm, "Klaus Wuestefeld" <klauswuestef...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Me too.

Rodrigo B. de Oliveira

unread,
Apr 19, 2008, 9:29:32 AM4/19/08
to boo...@googlegroups.com
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Dan <dan.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have made a small attempt to search the web but I have found no
> answers to my question, so here goes:
> Have there been any boojay releases, or is it still in a development/
> proof of concept phase?
>

No release yet. But definitely past the proof of concept phase.

> I very much like the language, and would like to be able to use it to
> do development for both the jvm and the .net runtime.
>

Yes. That will be great indeed.

I've just recently received an additional incentive to get it ready
for real world use so stay tuned.

Best wishes,
Rodrigo

TreeForm

unread,
Apr 20, 2008, 5:37:20 PM4/20/08
to boojay
Oh that is great. I wonder with .net version and the jvm version will
we see a native C based version of the boo language?

On Apr 19, 6:29 am, "Rodrigo B. de Oliveira" <rodrigobam...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Dan Shryock

unread,
Apr 20, 2008, 5:41:45 PM4/20/08
to boo...@googlegroups.com
Rodrigo,

Great news! I look forward to the continued progress on this great project.

Dan

lovepython

unread,
May 14, 2008, 7:03:39 PM5/14/08
to boojay
Good job, Rodrigo!!

I love the python-like syntax and the local type inference of boo,
although I am not particularly in fond of the ever growing set of
features. IMHO, too many features easily lead to very different coding
styles. The code may indeed be wrist friendly, but will also be eye
and mind unfriendly. Perl is such an example: essentially one
programmer can't read another programmer's code.

The complaint aside, I guess I can just use the features I like in my
project. :) I love the idea of a java backend. In fact, if boojay
could achieve the following
(1) allow boojay to access *all* java libraries, including those that
throw exceptions and
(2) allow java code to access *all* boojay classes and methods.
(3) allow boojay to generate real *very readable* and *very
straightforward* java source code.
(4) allow boojay to achieve almost the same (within 10% difference)
performance as code written in Java.
I swear I will write all my code in boojay and send all other
languages into trash cans.

I guess what I really want is Java in python syntax....

And... when can I expect a release :)

Junwen

Paul King

unread,
Jun 6, 2008, 9:42:57 PM6/6/08
to boojay


On Apr 19, 11:29 pm, "Rodrigo B. de Oliveira"
<rodrigobam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've just recently received an additional incentive to get it ready
> for real world use so stay tuned.

Any news?

Thanks, Paul.

TreeForm

unread,
Jul 30, 2008, 8:56:17 PM7/30/08
to boojay
I would also like some news.

filgood

unread,
Aug 6, 2008, 7:07:09 PM8/6/08
to boojay
me too...very keen to play with Boo in JVM.... many thanks for the
work so far....

~ Fil
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages