NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:52:58 -0600
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:52:58 +0000
From: ~BD~ <~BD~@
nomail.afraid.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:
1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 SeaMonkey/2.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Subject: Re: Ping: philo
References: <
utidndzBltQyHGfR...@bt.com> <idek0t
$ei4$
1...@news.eternal-september.org> <ideofb$lmm$
1...@speranza.aioe.org>
<idg4lj$5dv$
1...@speranza.aioe.org> <idg6ps$gsd$1...@news.eternal-
september.org> <
EL6dnSl__q5-PWbR...@bt.com> <fINKo.
1772$g84....@newsfe30.ams2> <idgapd$g1d$
1...@news.eternal-september.org>
<KjOKo.1779$g84....@newsfe30.ams2>
<
j9KdnZB0LeuhTWbR...@bt.com> <idgkeu$qfo$1...@news.eternal-
september.org> <
ptudnXd5XJ0XQWbR...@bt.com>
<idh139$fo3$
1...@news.eternal-september.org>
In-Reply-To: <idh139$fo3$
1...@news.eternal-september.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <
qYmdnccGkc0nlGHR...@bt.com>
Lines: 54
X-Usenet-Provider:
http://www.giganews.com
X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser
X-Trace: sv3-gFVlMcPFxuIXz/I+XrPsx8NLduwWvvHExIYcvNE39Mf7X7+
+GDh0YoQHnOEe3NVf4PpGEQGvau5IfY/!
VRkL4f5TG9u4rsXGV5bm5r8IKSM7ZHzmrXMaj1JSj8wzoSys7pXgPj/XOVxKMC/
O5GJIZi3yTeIS
X-Complaints-To:
ab...@btinternet.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
ab...@btinternet.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3848
X-Original-Bytes: 3787
Path:
x-privat.org!
feeder.erje.net!
border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!
Xl.tags.giganews.com!
border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!
nntp.giganews.com!
local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!
nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-
mail
Xref:
news.x-privat.org 24hoursupport.helpdesk:264333
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> You'd be wrong, once again. He just doesn't care about HTML construction
>>> errors.
>>
>> I don't think he gives a shit about many things. That's allowed.
>>
>>>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty thought otherwise. He once said:-
>>>
>>> There you go again, you despicable cockroach -- posting the
>>> copyrighted material of others (from a year and a half ago) without
>>> asking permission. No wonder nobody likes you.
>>
>> Tell me why you allow *Google* to make your material available to
>> anyone.
>
> What kind of silly statement is that? Do you think I - or you - have
> any control over what Google does? My post is archived, along with
> billions of other ones. There is a difference between an archived post
> in one group, and you copying *my* original content and posting it
> elsewhere. You could have just posted the MID, but no, your intent was
> to incite. For starters, it had no relevance in this thread.
Yes it had. aardvark would not have followed a MID/link.
> But of course you don't care, because you have no regard for other human
> beings. Except that woman.
Perhaps you had better specify *which* woman. The Virgin Mary?
>> Do you think I care about being *liked*? Think again.
>>
>> I detest the Cybercriminals who are stealing $Billions from
>> unsuspecting folk - and using some of it to train terrorists who seek
>> to kill us. You may not care about your family , friends and
>> acquaintances, even fellow human beings you do not know, but *I* do.
>
> Detesting cybercriminals is not a license for you to abuse other people.
I abuse no one. I simply ask questions when I do not understand.
>> And you *STILL* refuse to check whether or not my SeaMonkey newsreader
>> is threading properly!<shakes head in disbelief>
>
> I *STILL* don't give a shit about your SeaMonkey threading. If it
> bothers *YOU* get a better newsreader.<shake harder; maybe it will fall
> off>
Enjoy the rest of your life here on earth.
It may end sooner than you might think.