Just an opinion and not a strongly-held one at that, but... I suspect that “master/slave” terminology is much more common in practice with actual systems than primary/backup. Further backup in particular is a semantically loaded term which might not actually be an appropriate synonym for slave in all, or even most, uses of this pattern.
If the desire to avoid that terminology is somehow driven by concerns of PC, it might be worth pointing out: these are, after all, machines and software mechanisms. ;-)
jb