Hi Milly,
So the grades are up. I loved your magazine. It represented a huge amount of creativity and work on your part. For the most part you did a good analysis. and did very good research. Your idea was original. Your use of class materials was not as deep as I would have hoped, but then again, you took on a giant project by constructing this lovely graphic final product.
So overall you did a very good job and produced an interesting and innovative piece of work. You asked good questions. I have to let you know, however, that at the graduate level, you will want to try to step up your game in terms of verbal expression. Your writing is vivacious and to the point, which is great, something that is hard to accomplish, but there were certain idiomatic uses that were more colloquial than what one would want to see in graduate level writing.
(For instance, you mentioned one of the theorists was 'discussing on' a topic, which is not correct usage. There were a few sentence fragments. There were a couple of sections where several paragraphs in a row were reproduced verbatim in the next few lines, so that you were repeating yourself. Sometimes word choice needed adjustment (like in the Jennifer Lopez section, you mentioned her outfit was 'revealing nothing to the imagination,' where I think you might have meant 'leaving nothing to the imagination'). Since, revealing nothing in fact means she was covered up.
These may seem like petty details, and indeed they are subtleties that other professors might not mention, but I think they could mean the difference between an A and an A- in your future career at the Grad Center. I think you have tremendous potential and so took the extra time to talk to you about this, so that moving forward you might pay particular attention to this issue, and so prevent being judged unfairly, since the content of your work is very promising, so why let errors in expression get in the way of getting that content taken at its true worth?
So, the research was great, overall presentation AMAZING, writing style was wonderfully direct and engaging, graphics were excellent, questions were very well positioned. It was just some of the verbal expression that might need tweaking. There weren't even that many examples of a problem, but from what I know the academic world, and even one grammatical error can delegitimate what you are saying, so I took the risk of letting you know my reaction to it, so that in the future, you can proof read and copy edit your work to the point where it can shine through on its considerable merit and not be sidelined by minor details like word choice.
Take care, and hope your New Year is off to a great start.
--
Elizabeth Wissinger PhD
Associate Professor of Sociology
BMCC/City University of New York
what I have been up to:
(my new book!
Fashioning Models:
(Editorial Board: