The Tyrant Penelope Sky Pdf Download

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Sheila Cast

unread,
Aug 4, 2024, 11:39:23 PM8/4/24
to bitvoibracap
Inhis report of the accident, Chapuys wrote:"On the eve of the Conversion of St. Paul, the King being mounted on a great horse to run at the lists, both fell so heavily that every one thought it a miracle he was not killed, but he sustained no injury. Thinks he might ask of fortune for what greater misfortune he is reserved, like the other tyrant who escaped from the fall of the house, in which all the rest were smothered, and soon after died."1Sharon asked me whether I knew who Chapuys was referring to when he said "the other tyrant who escaped from the fall of the house, in which all the rest were smothered, and soon after died", and I must admit that I had always been perplexed by this reference, so I got researching.

Machine in a dramatic poem is an artifice by which the poet brings onto the stage some divinity, genie, or other supernatural being, in order to execute some important scheme or to resolve some problem that exceeds the capacity of man.


These machines , among the ancients, were the gods, the good or evil genies, the shades, etc. Shakespeare and our modern French writers prior to Corneille still used the last of these resources. They received their name from the machines or mechanical inventions that are used to bring them on and off the stage in a manner that imitates the marvelous.


Although this explanation does not apply to the epic poem, it was nonetheless agreed to give the name of machines to the supernatural beings that are introduced into the poem. This word marks in both the dramatic and epic genres the intervention or action of some divinity; but since the situations that may bring about the use of machines or render them necessary are not the same in the two genres, the rules that one must follow are also different.


The ancient dramatic poets never allowed any machine on the stage unless the presence of the god was absolutely necessary, and they were booed when, by their own fault, they were reduced to this necessity. They adhered to the principle, grounded in nature, that the denouement of a play must arise from the very core of the plot and not from an extraneous machine , which the most sterile genius can introduce to quickly get out of a difficult spot, as in Medea, when she escapes the vengeance of Creon by flying through the air on a chariot drawn by winged dragons. Horace seems a little less severe and merely says that the gods must never appear on stage unless the dramatic problem is worthy of their presence.


The poet, for example, must allow the historian to narrate how a fleet was scattered by a storm and heaved up onto foreign shores; but the poet must follow Virgil in saying that Juno called upon Aeolus, that the tyrant of the seas unleashed the winds and caused them to rise up against the Trojans, and he must make Neptune intervene to prevent their being shipwrecked. A historian will say that a young prince behaved on all occasions with much prudence and discretion; the poet must say as Homer did that Minerva led his hero by the hand. The poet should permit the historian to tell how Agamemnon, in his quarrel with Achilles, wanted to make the prince understand, albeit with little basis, that he could take Troy without his help. The poet must represent Thetis, irritated by the affront that her son received, flying to the heavens to ask Jupiter for revenge; and he must tell how that god, in order to satisfy her, sends Agamemnon a deceitful dream, which persuades him that on that very day he will become the master of Troy.


The use of machines in the epic poem is, in some respects, entirely opposed to what Horace prescribes for the dramatic poem. Here they must be allowed only in an extreme and absolute necessity; there it seems that they are used at every moment, even when one could do without them, which is far different from being required by the action. How many gods and machines does Virgil use to call up the storm that propels Aeneas onto the shores of Carthage, when that could easily have happened in the ordinary course of natural events? Machines in the epic are thus not at all an artifice on the part of the poet to rescue him when he has made a faux pas, or to help him out of particular difficulties in certain places in his poem; they are only the presence of a god or some supernatural and extraordinary action that the poet inserts throughout his composition to make it more majestic and more admirable, or at the same time to inspire ideas of respect for the divinity or sentiments of virtue in his readers. Now this mixture must be used in such a way that the machines may be deleted without taking anything away from the action.


As to the manner of introducing them and making them act, we must observe that in Mythology good gods were distinguished from evil-doing gods and indifferent gods, and one can make each of our passions into so many allegorical divinities, so that everything virtuous or criminal that takes place in a poem can be attributed to these machines , either as their cause or their opportunity, and can be done through their agency. However, they must not all or always act in the same way. Sometimes they will act without appearing, and by simple inspiration, which will not in itself be miraculous or extraordinary, as when we say that the devil suggested some thought or other; sometimes they will act in a completely miraculous way, as when a divinity makes itself visible to men and lets itself be known or when, without revealing itself, it is disguised in human form. Finally the poet may use all at once both of these ways of introducing a machine , as when he imagines oracles, dreams and extraordinary inspirations, which Pre le Bossu calls demi-machines . In every case, he must be careful not to be far-fetched; for if verisimilitude is quite elastic where machines are concerned, it nonetheless has its limits. See Verisimilitude.


We agree that the ancient poets were able to bring divinities into the epic; but do the moderns have the same privilege? That is a question that one will find examined at the word marvelous . See Marvelous.

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages