NPM version mismatch for eckey and ecurve-names

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Brooks Boyd

unread,
Jan 23, 2014, 10:16:26 PM1/23/14
to Bitcoin...@googlegroups.com
FYI, the version numbers for the eckey and ecurve-names somehow got mismatched between the reported version in NPM and the actual version in the package.json file. NPM wouldn't let me unpublish the 0.2.0 version of ecurve-names, so I had to leapfrog past it to 0.2.1. For eckey, I unpublished the 0.3.0 version and published 0.2.1 instead, fixing the issues GitHub user dominictarr fixed with the package names changing a few months ago.

JP, did you or vbuterin intend to publish newer versions of those packages without updating the package.json file?

Brooks

JP Richardson

unread,
Jan 25, 2014, 12:11:47 AM1/25/14
to Bitcoin...@googlegroups.com
Weird. My copy of eckey and package.json shows 0.3.0. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Hackers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to BitcoinHacker...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jprichardson

Brooks Boyd

unread,
Jan 25, 2014, 12:15:37 AM1/25/14
to JP Richardson, Bitcoin...@googlegroups.com
You must never have actually pushed it to the server? Does your local git client think your master is in sync with the origin? Do you hae other commits in that branch that are needing to get back in the remote server version?

Brooks

JP Richardson

unread,
Jan 25, 2014, 1:22:23 AM1/25/14
to Bitcoin...@googlegroups.com
Yeah, looks like the differences were due to the package deps. Looks like you fixed it.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages