Bitcoin Hackers

Interesting! My initial reaction is What about double spends in this case? On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:

Ah, good point; I thought Node Buffers were backed by Typed Arrays instead of vanilla ones, but those

I am not sure what your intentions are, but frankly this sounds a bit scammy. On Monday, May 5, 2014

For combining a Wallet with a TiddlyWiki, the concept I'm seeing is that with the current

Sounds fine to me. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:39 AM, JP Richardson <jprich...@gmail.com>

Pretty simple from a logic-perspective, but in terms of DRY, you'll have those same three lines

Sure, you should follow the conversation. We are all working on different projects here! On Mon, Mar

38's not the Hierarchical Deterministic wallet one; it's the password-protected key one.

Something like this might be appropriate https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/test/data

Agreed. I think the server implementation would be good. I think though, before 0.4 release, we

Hey Brooks. Actually it does do "is this output spent query", but it doesn't have an

FYI, I updated this diagram and added it to the main "cryptocoin" module's wiki: https:

The following validations required data from storage Reject if we already have matching tx in the

Yeah, looks like the differences were due to the package deps. Looks like you fixed it. On Fri, Jan

Awesome, thanks! Glanced at 'em... looks good. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Brooks Boyd <

Haha that looks pretty good. :P love it. I am going to start building out this feature in the next

Okay, I've published the updated binstring as v0.2.0 now. Do you have any further thoughts about

haha, man you have done everything. I was figuring out how to best contribute to this project. I

Hey Brooks, Just opened it up. I am new to google groups :) I am going to add you guys as moderators

You could make a separate database server/application running a connection to a LevelDB back-end,