Bitcoin Development Mailing List

Hi Donald and all, The idea of recycling dormant coins is one that has made the rounds several times

Hi Conduition, hi Jameson, hi all! What if all vulnerable coins are temporarily locked during phase B

Thanks for pointing this out Or. For those not familiar with Or's approach, it would share many

Hi Antoine, Could you please clearly describe the "attack" with a clear threat model? I don

Hi James, I'll let readers decide for themselves whether your citation of that data was intended

IMHO, this use case is already solved more generally using descriptors (BIP-38x), which already come

Hi All, During last year's discussion on adding new BIP Editors, AJ [noted][1] that it might be

Hello all, I am glad to inform that after years of development (6 years since I had joined to lead

Hi Greg, I'm not sure I quite follow the membership proof concern. The reason to use MuHash is to

Hi all, I'm Aaron Zhang, an independent developer focused on Bitcoin script engineering and

> Agreed. AFAICT, the only reason we'd use WOTS+ over stock > WOTS (w/o randomizers) would

We made the following changes to BIP-360 (Pay to Quantum Resistant Hash) PR: P2QRH (Pay to Quantum

Hi BitMan, Can check the original thread by jgarzik, before LEO constellations were cool: https://

> Unfortunately it's a hard-fork. What about increasing the time of the block from 10 minutes

Hi Tim, answers inline: > Your observation is right: If each participant has a distinct b_i as you

> That is why it is better -- I can activate my own thing, without bothering you all. After

Bitcoin Core version 28.2 is now available from: <https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-28.2/

> While doing some research I realized that an attacker can lock 1 BTC for 3 months and open a

Hi All, Recently someone pointed out that BIP 380 specifies that `H` can be used as a hardened

Hi Dave, Thanks for your thoughts on the subject. I don't know if I were among the first one to

Hi Kanzure and others, Thanks for your thoughts on this subject. (...I initially swear to myself to

Dear Bitcoin developers, I'd like to propose a modest but meaningful improvement to Bitcoin node

Actually, one of the proposed parameter sets (G-7) for SLH-DSA (which is currently in discussion at

Thanks for clarifying, Leo, that does make a bit more sense now. I'm not in love with the

Hi Chris, I'm replying to a few points that matter imo. Again, as I tried to emphasize in my

Hi Jonathan, I feel you're making a bigger deal of this than it needs to be. We're talking

On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:35:37AM +0000, Peter Todd wrote: > FYI I ran a short experiment with my

On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 3:57 AM pithosian <pith...@i2pmail.org> wrote: I'm not totally

Hi Boris, BIP 327 explicitly allows for duplicate participant pubkeys, so as long as all signing

Hi Aviv, Thanks for posting about your BIP idea. I must admit that I have lost track of the finer