Hi Aviv,
Thanks for posting about your BIP idea. I must admit that I have lost
track of the finer details of Lightning Addresses, LNURL, and other
similar schemes, so I’m not in a position to comment on a comparison of
your idea to those.
One of the criticisms that I remember from when Lightning Address was
first introduced was that it would have been better to avoid the email
format. After glancing at your draft, I would like to suggest that you
clarify how you propose that the paysats would be communicated. I would
suggest staying clear of the email format, not only, because senders
sometimes mistake it for an email address, but also because there are
now other similar schemes that use email formatting already and it would
not be clear which resolution to use when encountering it.
Otherwise, this seems like a decent start of a BIP, although it would
help if you lay out more clearly how your idea compares with similar
schemes in the Rationale, in addition to what you already wrote about
BIP 353.
Cheers,
Murch
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to
bitcoindev+...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit
>
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAEbZFSsA49mnsVia7L-0k9S%3Doa93nCN4KudHdK8ZnSbboenohw%40mail.gmail.com
> <
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAEbZFSsA49mnsVia7L-0k9S%3Doa93nCN4KudHdK8ZnSbboenohw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.