Bitcoin Development Mailing List

Hi waxwing, Thanks again for your comments. > My initial reaction would be, since it's not

Dear conduition, On Tuesday, July 15, 2025 at 4:57:23 PM UTC+3 conduition wrote: Thanks for pointing

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 06:59:18PM -0400, James O'Beirne wrote: > Hi Antoine, > > >

Hey Conduition and all! On Wednesday, July 16, 2025 at 1:48:27 PM UTC-3 conduition wrote: Hey Boris

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 03:02:04PM -0700, Murch wrote: > Hi Donald and all, > > The idea of

Hi Antoine, Could you please clearly describe the "attack" with a clear threat model? I don

IMHO, this use case is already solved more generally using descriptors (BIP-38x), which already come

Hi All, During last year's discussion on adding new BIP Editors, AJ [noted][1] that it might be

Hello all, I am glad to inform that after years of development (6 years since I had joined to lead

Hi Greg, I'm not sure I quite follow the membership proof concern. The reason to use MuHash is to

Hi all, I'm Aaron Zhang, an independent developer focused on Bitcoin script engineering and

> Agreed. AFAICT, the only reason we'd use WOTS+ over stock > WOTS (w/o randomizers) would

We made the following changes to BIP-360 (Pay to Quantum Resistant Hash) PR: P2QRH (Pay to Quantum

Hi BitMan, Can check the original thread by jgarzik, before LEO constellations were cool: https://

> Unfortunately it's a hard-fork. What about increasing the time of the block from 10 minutes

> That is why it is better -- I can activate my own thing, without bothering you all. After

Bitcoin Core version 28.2 is now available from: <https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-28.2/

> While doing some research I realized that an attacker can lock 1 BTC for 3 months and open a

Hi All, Recently someone pointed out that BIP 380 specifies that `H` can be used as a hardened

Hi Dave, Thanks for your thoughts on the subject. I don't know if I were among the first one to

Hi Kanzure and others, Thanks for your thoughts on this subject. (...I initially swear to myself to

Dear Bitcoin developers, I'd like to propose a modest but meaningful improvement to Bitcoin node

Actually, one of the proposed parameter sets (G-7) for SLH-DSA (which is currently in discussion at

Thanks for clarifying, Leo, that does make a bit more sense now. I'm not in love with the

Hi Chris, I'm replying to a few points that matter imo. Again, as I tried to emphasize in my

Hi Jonathan, I feel you're making a bigger deal of this than it needs to be. We're talking

On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:35:37AM +0000, Peter Todd wrote: > FYI I ran a short experiment with my

On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 3:57 AM pithosian <pith...@i2pmail.org> wrote: I'm not totally

Hi Boris, BIP 327 explicitly allows for duplicate participant pubkeys, so as long as all signing

Hi Aviv, Thanks for posting about your BIP idea. I must admit that I have lost track of the finer