Bitcoin Development Mailing List

One more thing to mention - none of the hardware wallets that I've tested show the custom

Hi all, Reposting from the subscribed address — apologies for the earlier bounce. Now that I'm

Hi everyone, Some previously raised points regarding BIP 54 have come up again recently, and i would

Hi list, > Which brings me to my disagreement, which I know is not shared by a number of

Hi all, Regarding the recent discussion on commit-based approaches: I agree with the general

> The given rationale for a difficulty reset was to let developers occasionally mine blocks on

Hi everyone, I've been following the discussion regarding the trade-offs of Post-Quantum

This is amazing! I have always been concerned about the exposure of public keys (mostly because of

Hi Craig, a few comments about the cost of label scanning, as this topic comes up repeatedly: >

Hi Defenwycke, You replied to every line of my email, except the most relevant one. Murch wrote: >

Hi everyone, We organized an IRC [meeting][0] in #ctv-csfs-activation channel on 18 December 2025 to

Hi everyone, The old bitcoin-dev mailing list had a secondary mailing list for moderated emails:

Hi All, Just a small remark > lnhance is more comprehensive. but also it's so much harder to

Hello world, I've been thinking recently about a few ideas that would benefit from new p2p

Hi Josh, Interesting observation! I am of the opinion that the header timestamp overflow is one of

Was thinking about this and I realized that a quantum-resistance scheme doesn't technically need

Hi everyone, the pull request implementing the feedback from this thread was merged today. The PR

Ah, I see you're right—once MTP reaches 2^32 - 1, no valid timestamp can exceed it, making the

Hi all, I'm working on the implementation of silent payments in BDK. BDK's transaction

Hi Defenwycke, I'm already working on a native multi-process architecture where the traffic

Hi Antoine, Thank you very much for your detailed reply—it's extremely helpful. Following your

Thanks both Eric and Erik for the replies. I can't answer whether RAM requirements due to UTXO

I've started putting together some ideas around how to remove objectionable content from the

Hi everyone, I'd like to propose an alternative approach to quantum resistance for Bitcoin that I

On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 11:32:48AM -0800, Boris Nagaev wrote: > Hi waxwing/AdamISZ, > > On

Hi everyone, We will organize a meeting next week to discuss the activation parameters for BIP 119.

Hello all, I would appreciate early peer review on two BIP drafts I have published: BUDS (Bitcoin

Thanks Boris! > I just noticed that BIP360 doesn't appear to specify the exact hash function

Hey Tadge, You're right that OP_CIV would discourage address reuse, but it'd also make life

Hi Russell, thanks for taking a look at the code. In interpreter.cpp the static function