Bitcoin Development Mailing List

On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 10:58:00 PM UTC+2 Hunter Beast wrote: Thank you for this! It's

And yes, I understand how demand for such services makes sense, and I do not fault you for pursuing

> I think mining a more-work chain than testnet4 would require about the same amount of hash that

> You can find the advisory on the Bitcoin Core project website at https://bitcoincore.org/en/2025

Hi Chris, I was contacted by other ML members pointing out that the GSR may not have announced on the

Hi Sjors, The point I'm making is that introducing more complexity to try and mitigate this issue

On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 08:06:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > So the mempoolfullrbf default

TLDR: I'm exploring an idea to enable generalized program composition and coin delegation, which

I would like to update you about an alternative protocol to BitVM that we have been working on, which

Trading volume is a good perspective to view this through, actually. If an attacker decides to

On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 9:07 AM Greg Maxwell <gmax...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday,

Hi, If the author of the BIP would like to add some accessibility and voice/UI guidance mentioned by

Hi Sjors, > In the context of BIP30 [0] Eric Voskuil brought up performance: I didn't

> That partial signatures do not leak information about the secret key x_k is implied by the

I'm late, but want to share thoughts. I gathered from this thread the way more pertinent and

I think it's worth trying, but I don't think it's going to work. There's always going

> Should we plan for a reset of testnet? Surprisingly, it is a very good question. However,

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 12:25:08PM -0400, Russell O'Connor wrote: > Ah nevermind, I get it now

Bitcoin Core version 29.0 is now available from: <https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-29.0/

> I'm happy to see thinking and discussion in this area. Getting this discussion going was

On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 12:35, Javier Mateos <javier...@gmail.com> wrote: > If the

On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 12:25:26PM +0000, Pieter Wuille wrote: > On Monday, March 31st, 2025 at 4:

Hi AdamISZ/waxwing, I discussed with the maintainers, and we do consider MuSig2 and adaptor

Hi Sanket, I've heard before from some lightning folks that migrating to testnet4 presents a

Hi Eric, Thanks for chiming in. > This kind of discontinuity always comes back to bite eventually.

Indeed, that's what I meant. Even crazy long period like two weeks is still better than losing

Hi Yuval, > My point was more that this problem is inherent in any on-chain > payment, ie even

Hi Murch, Thanks for working on this. I just caught up with the latest version of BIP3 and i agree it

Hi Greg, > Noting that from my quick glance that the CSFS implemented in mutinynet is not BIP348

Binaries for Bitcoin Core version v29.0rc2 are available from: https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-