Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

delete SYSTEM symbolic parameter

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Frank Swarbrick

unread,
Jul 8, 2008, 12:00:50 PM7/8/08
to
Other than IPLing, is there a way to delete a SYSTEM symbolic parameter (set
by // SETPARM SYSTEM,parmname=something)?
I can set it to "null", but I really want it gone totally.

Thanks,
Frank

indust...@winwholesale.com

unread,
Jul 8, 2008, 12:15:49 PM7/8/08
to
owner...@Lehigh.EDU wrote on 07/08/2008 12:00:50 PM:
> Other than IPLing, is there a way to delete a SYSTEM symbolic parameter

I don't think so... I haven't seen a JCL or console command for
that. Your own assembler program may be able to do that.

Sincerely,

Dave Clark

WinWholesale Group Services
3110 Kettering Boulevard
Dayton, Ohio 45439 USA
(937) 294-5331
This email message and any attachments is for use only by the named
addressee(s) and may contain confidential, privileged and/or proprietary
information. If you have received this message in error, please
immediately notify the sender and delete and destroy the message and all
copies. All unauthorized direct or indirect use or disclosure of this
message is strictly prohibited. No right to confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any error in transmission.

Martin T2..

unread,
Jul 8, 2008, 12:23:17 PM7/8/08
to
Frank,

I did not know of one in 2002 either- so I wrote SYSVAR- can be
downloaded from FREEWARE on my site.

Problem (for you): it is free. But hey- It is okay if you declare the
code to be your own (comes with source).

--
Martin
--
XML2PDF - the way to get all features of PDF into your documents
on mainframe or PC systems; more at http://www.pi-sysprog.de

Frank Swarbrick

unread,
Jul 8, 2008, 3:21:10 PM7/8/08
to
>>> On 7/8/2008 at 10:23 AM, in message <48739456...@pi-sysprog.de>,

Martin T2..<Mar...@pi-sysprog.de> wrote:
> Frank,
>
> I did not know of one in 2002 either- so I wrote SYSVAR- can be
> downloaded from FREEWARE on my site.

Perfect! That did the trick.

I notice that you used MODESET KEY=ZERO. Interesting...

Here's another thing perhaps of interest. You probably know that there is
now a VSE AR command "QUERY SETPARM,SYSTEM". Before I ran your program I
got this:
QUERY SETPARM,SYSTEM
AR 0015 DBNAME =
AR 0015 1I40I READY

Afterward I get this:
QUERY SETPARM,SYSTEM
AR 0015 BNAME =
AR 0015 1I40I READY

Still, DBNAME no does not exist, so it does what I want.

Thanks!
Frank

Martin T2..

unread,
Jul 9, 2008, 2:42:36 AM7/9/08
to
Frank,

>> I notice that you used MODESET KEY=ZERO. Interesting... <<

Is that a question or a remark/reminicense to a recent thread.

If it was a question: I use it because I need key 0 for certain things.

>> ... another thing ... now a VSE AR command "QUERY SETPARM,SYSTEM". <<

Interstingly- I know that they now have implemented part of what SYSVAR
does.... the effect that you see is exactly what I do. I move a low
value to the first byte. This effectly makes it impossible to retrieve
that parm.

The fact that QUERY SYSTEM,SYSPARM shows it, demonstrates IMHO what
happens when one part is written by A and the other part by B. And this
is no reference to qualification! ;-)

Frank Swarbrick

unread,
Jul 9, 2008, 11:13:31 AM7/9/08
to
>>> On 7/9/2008 at 12:42 AM, in message <48745DB2...@pi-sysprog.de>,

Martin T2..<Mar...@pi-sysprog.de> wrote:
> Frank,
>
> >> I notice that you used MODESET KEY=ZERO. Interesting... <<
>
> Is that a question or a remark/reminicense to a recent thread.

Just a remark based on your comment about KEY=ZERO in the "using GETSYMB
macro under CICS" thread. :-)



> >> ... another thing ... now a VSE AR command "QUERY SETPARM,SYSTEM". <<
>
> Interstingly- I know that they now have implemented part of what SYSVAR
> does.... the effect that you see is exactly what I do. I move a low
> value to the first byte. This effectly makes it impossible to retrieve
> that parm.
>
> The fact that QUERY SYSTEM,SYSPARM shows it, demonstrates IMHO what
> happens when one part is written by A and the other part by B. And this
> is no reference to qualification! ;-)

'Tis amusing, yes.

Frank

0 new messages