Steve
Yes, in a sense one can agree. Yet, it is difficult to say
something like
that without sounding racist. For one thing there's the guilt by
association, one is most likely to hear such a statement from racists
thus,
upon hearing such a statement, the speaker is automatically assumed to be
racist. Note that one doesn't hear as often things like Irish-Americans
should thank their lucky stars their ancestors had a horrible famine that
killed a million Irish; or, Israel is such a nifty country, Jews should
thank their lucky stars that half a dozen million of them were slaughtered
in Nazi death camps in WWII (though, if Israel does really well in the
future maybe we'll hear such statements more often --particularly as the
holocaust starts seeming more and more remote). You could probably make
the
same sort of statement about nearly any thirld world country refugee group
found in the U.S. on the basis (if nothing else) of standard of living.
Yet,
I've only ever heard such a statement made about blacks.
In the end, the worst part about this sort of statement is that it
always
ends up sounding like blacks (or whatever group) should just shut up about
whatever grievances they feel they have because things would be much worse
if they were in Africa (I'm sure you are not trying to say that but that
is
what will come through in the ears of many).
Also, I tend to regard these sorts of statements as meaningful as
saying:
aren't you lucky that your dad wore the right kind of underwear that
ensured
that a certain sperm cell and not another would win the race and create
you
(or if you are into anti abortion rethoric: aren't you glad your mother
didn't abort you?). It's really not making any useful point besides
pointing
out that things are really bad in Africa and less bad in the U.S.A. --word
differently if you're one of those glass is half full guys.
> Remember Idi Amin? Rwanda? Somalia? While I detest racism in any form,
it
> often draws attention away from other horrors being committed by
> persons of
> the same race. One reason it does is that racism is easy to see: White
vs
> Black; Asian vs. White, etc. But a child murdered by a person of the
same
> race is just as dead as if she were killed by a member of another. The
In the U.S. I believe black on black (and white on white) violence
is more
common than violence across racial lines (though I'm stating this from
memory and couldn't give you any citations to back it up). Dead is dead.
> majority of killings in Rwanda were commited with machetes, not AK-47s.
> Tribal warfare still reigns in the Dark Continent.
>
> Steve
>
August Pamplona
Steve
> This is politically incorrect to the extreme, but I think that
> African-Americans should thank their lucky stars their ancestors were
brought
> here. Virtually any American has a better standard of living and a safer
> existence than blacks living in their ancestral homelands currently.
What a patronising statement. If you had said something along the lines of
'Many African-Americans might thank their lucky stars they live in America
and not Africa
There are some British (although thankfully fewer every year as that
generation dies out) who believe we were never properly thanked for
invading and butchering various natives, since they are all far better off
for it now. Perhaps you would like to thank me now for the potato famine,
personally and with interest...
If it is wrong to blame a modern people for the crimes of their ancestors,
it is also wrong to expect any sort of gratitude from descendents of the
victims, who got lucky.
Nick
----------------------------------------------------------------
Get your free email from AltaVista at http://altavista.iname.com