Dear Mr. Giglio,
I understand now
why you and your sceptical associates continue to remain unsatisfied. Your
bitterness and scepticism is palpable in your sarcasm. If you
really want answers, you would do well to
exercise a little more courtesy in your
responses. Be this as it may, I
shall try to reply with information that may help
you to see that these events as
factual, and not mere "hearsay".
JCG: "this demo of alien propulsion
technology, supposedly the result of reverse-engineering, carried out by
sinister, ultra-secret black projects accountable to nobody,
(not even the president), was being
carried out inside a hangar WHILE AN AIRSHOW WAS GOING ON OUTSIDE."
MEM:
Brad indicated in his story that the large hangar at the extreme west end of the
Norton AFB main runway, at the opposite end of the airfield from the static
displays of aircraft the public had access to. The large hangar was
completely surrounded by military police with loaded M-16 rifles.
They were standing behind a rope and standard barrier, with signs posted at
intervals including words to the effect of, " WARNING! NO UNAUTHORIZED
ACCESS- USE OF DEADLY FORCE IS AUTHORIZED". The hangar appears to be four
very large Quonset hut style buildings all tied together by a number of single
or four story engineering/repair shops in the middle and on the east and west
flanks of the building. The four hangars are large enough that a
single
C-5A/B Galaxy can be serviced in
each one. The gentleman that Brad was accompanying flashed a Pentagon
Identification Card to one of the guards, who then enterred the building,
returning with a man in civilian clothes who recognized Brad's associate
and then verbally vouched for admission
of the two men.
Once inside the hangar,
Brad's associate seemed more nervous
than he had been, and taking Brad aside, informed him that the presentation included a number
of additional aircraft beyond the list
he had thought were going to be present. The man told Brad to keep his
mouth shut, not to ask any questions, and just silently observe the
proceedings.
Brad indicated
in his story that there were no "flying saucers" exhibited in the first section
of the hangar they enterred. The first hangar section included the losing
competitor in the B-2 Stealth Bomber fly off, a craft built by the team of
Rockwell
International's North American Aircraft
Division (NAA) and Lockheed Martin. This flying wing design looked
remarkably like the flying wing mockup that Honda used in its TV commercials in
the late 1980's to introduce it's new CRX hatchback. You may recall the
commercial, showing the little CRX driving back and forth under the black flying
wing, the car itself being black. The mockup was faceted, just like
the F-117A Stealth Fighter
the grainy photo of which was publicly
released for the first time within about two weeks of the November 12, 1988
airshow. The obvious question here is, how did the Japanese company
Honda know that one of the significant features of stealth technology involved a
faceted airframe, BEFORE the release of the first Stealth Fighter
photos. Could it be that they had
been contacted by Tony Landis, a professional photographer who had been sneaking
around the hills of Tonopah, Nevada for several years prior to that date?
Or was there a big leak over at Lockheed or Rockwell?
The answer may
be both. In the mid-1980's, Gung-ho Magazine produced an
issue with a strange looking,
black, lifting-body aircraft on the cover. It was actually a model
build and photographed in front of an
enlarged photo background by Rockwell
NAA employee Eric Simonsen.
The article was written under a pseudonym, (which I don't recall) but the
individual who wrote it was a Lockheed employee who worked closely with their
photography and marketing division. Near the end of the article
there was a paragraph that first alluded to the secret facility generally known
of as AREA-51, and that there were extremely advanced propulsion systems under development there. But I
digress.
Also in the
hangar, were two different high-technogy hovercraft, a proposed replacement for
the A-10 "Warthog" tank buster, that had wings that looked like venetian blinds
and the Aurora.
The "Aurora" was
described as a smooth, rounded-diamond shape, completely covered by black, heat
ablation tiles like the Space Shuttle. It had no visable
cockpit,
no wings, no tail (vertical
stabilizer). It had three modes of propulsion. Four, large
conventional high-bypass turbo-jet engines, similar in design to those employed
in the old SR-71 Blackbird. each engine had two naca duct shaped inlets
and two trapazoidal shaped exhaust ports, all of which could close off flush
with the outer hull of the airframe. About one hundred feet in length and
seventy feet wide, the vehicle had
a slight ridge running transversely,
(dorsally and ventrally) at its widest point, along its trailing edge were
hundreds of little ports that looked like fuel injectors pointed outward.
Once the four internal engines bring the craft up to something in excess of Mach
2, the trapdoors begin closing and fuel is pulsed from the ejector ports along
the ridge. The Hydrogen fuel spontaneously explodes on contact with the
super-heated air flowing over the craft, expanding between the tappered afterbody and the
super-sonic shock wave that separates at the ridge. It essentially pinches
the rear of the craft, driving it forward at a speed around 12,000
miles per hour. During the transition from the internal engines to the
external pulse detonation mode, the con-trail it produces looks like "doughnuts
on a rope" . Sightings and photos of this phenomenon are well
documented, as are the super-sonic footprint of such a high velocity aircraft
crossing southern california, to and from south-central Nevada beginning in the
easrly 1980's. Lastly, the aircraft has an indefinite loiter capability,
(as did the SR-71 Blackbird), because both can enter a shallow dive from
operational altitude, then pull up with increased speed and go
exo-atmospheric. (An SR-71 fact that is still classified as far as I
know). While outside the atmosphere, the Aurora has a third propulsion
system for manuevering involving a rocket engine contained inside a
clamshell like compartment at the rear of the vehicle.
This stand-alone
aircraft was eventually sidelined in favor of a second generation
vehicle the kind you seem to be more
familiar with, since you mentioned "wings". I had a hand in producing some
conceptual art for Lockheed on this aircraft in 1984 or 5 for presentation
before a Congressional Appropriations Committee. They couldn't tell me
what the aircraft looked like because it was classified above my security
clearance of "SECRET" but they asked me to develop something believable
that would convince the Appropriations Committee that it was "fast". I
combined features of the SR-71 and the North American Aircraft XB-70 from the
1960's and came up with a real winner in my opinion.
When I presented
this art to the Lockheed staff, one of their engineers became visibly upset, red
faced and began yelling. The artwork featured an elongated fuselage,
blending into a triagular main wing, with large winglets at the outboard
tips. The fuselage included a chine or "lip" along its entire length, with
folding canards just aft of the cockpit. The engine nacelles were two
shaped "boxes" under the wing, each slightly outboard of the main body of the
fuselage where it blended into the wing. When I was challenged in such an
unreasonable and hostile manner concerning the features of the design, I simply
explained where my references had come from. About four years later, there
was a near miss mid-air collision event near Edwards AFB involving a
commercial airline from LAX involving an aircraft that strongly resembled my
drawings. I have personal friends who have seen it flying at dusk near Mt.
Wilson near Sierra Madre California about the same time. It was very
large, and was carrying a smaller vehicle similar to the second
generation Aurora design. It was then that I understood why the
Lockheed engineer had been so hostile: He thought I had gained access to
the file regarding the true design of this vehicle. You can now buy a
plastic model of this "mother ship" and it's built by the Testor's Model
Company.
Brad said
that in a separate area of the large hangar, that he had been shown three
"flying saucers", all having the same
general proportions and design, in diameters approximately 24, 60 and 130 feet
in diameter. They were all hovering silently in the hangar, which seemed
to be significantly colder than the outside temperature that day of 102 degrees
Farenheit. He said they all appeared to be quite old, with chips
and
greasy fingerprints in or on the exterior
finish. This jives with the chronology of Kent Sellen's statement/
sighting at Edwards AFB North Base complex in 1973.
Brad stated
that the sloping side of the fuselage, similar to a horizontal sectioning or
"frustrum" of a cone, was made up of roughly 24 composite panels, held in
place by dzus fasteners at an overlapping seam. One pair of panels was
removed, and another pair adjacent to them were hinged outward, allowing
the extension of a robotic arm, (apparently for sample collection). The
internal crew compartment was a large 12 foot diameter "pultruded" ball of
composite material. At its mid-waste was a large coil of copper colored
cable, embedded in a translucent, greenish glass or plastic-like
substance. The base was flat on this 24 foot model, about 12 inches
thick, with stacked wedges of copper-colored plates radially oriented about the
central sphere.
These "capacitor
plates" were about a half an inch thick, and separated by about three quarters
of an inch of a similar greenish, translucent material. The base appeared
to be one single molded piece. Gauging the capacitance of each section,
based on
the stats for Dow Chemical's "G-10"
dielectric material or Barium Titanate, I estimate that each section could store
between 1 to 5 million volts of potential. (Well within the
parameters claimed by Thomas Townscend
Brown in his experiments with the Biefield Brown Effect in the Princeton
laboratory of Agnew Bahnson. I verified this with one of his former lab
assistants, (a witness in the Disclosure Project) now residing in Southern
California.
The craft
nearest to the barrier in the second hangar section also had a video display
next to it, featuring footage of the craft hovering above a dry lake bed, making
three abrupt sideways "hops" then accellerating straight up and out of view in
under two seconds. Next to that was a cutaway illustration, that, with
Brad's help I was able to duplicate in some detail. He told me that he
felt it was the "most dangerous illustration" I had ever made, and if I was
smart, I'd get rid of it.
One point I
think you've neglected in your pledge to the sceptic midset, is that Brad
Sorensen and Kent Sellen do not know one another, and have never met. Kent
knew even more about the craft than Brad did. How would that be
possible, James, if the only criticism you can offer about Brad's story is that
the photo this craft resembles was a "proven fake"? Brad and Kent, two
direct observers are both still, very much alive.
I'll
be forwarding the Hercules Aerospace Inter Office Memo to you shortly- (the one
describing a series of DIA and Soviet scientist meetings on the subject of ZPE
and scalar technologies dating prior to 1988. (Isn't that implausible all
by itself?) Along with that, I'll include a copy of the ARV/Fluxliner
cutaway.
One last
thing. I do intend to write about all this eventually, and I'm creating my
own punchline before I start: I'm striving to build a small "proof of
concept" model of the ARV to show folks like yourself that this is a
reality. Therefore, I want you to consider my words and artwork as being
copyrighted material as of 1988 through the present. I'm kind of low on
time right now, so I'll continue again in the coming days.
Warm Regards,
Mark McCandlish