My two cents, for what it is worth, is that a graduate degree is not
necessary to be a registrar, but that most curatorial positions these days do
require at least an M.A. if not a Ph.D. I am from the group that does NOT
have a grad degree; I started out in a small university museum 20 years ago
as the receptionist, doing a little exhibition design on the side, with a
B.A. in art history. I worked my way up through the ranks, moving on to
bigger jobs in bigger museums, and for the past ten years have been
development director at my museum here in Southern California. Over my
career, I've hired many people; granted, the development function depends a
lot on "track record," but I often have hired people without graduate
training but who DO have some practical work experience in internships or
entry-level jobs. Our registrar began as a registrar's intern, then
assistant, and has now held her position as Registrar for over 10 years.
She, too, only has a B.A. in art history. However, we are in the process of
hiring some junior curatorial staff,and those definitely require an M.A.,
with additional practical experience a big plus.
In terms of certificated programs, I'm not that impressed with them,
personally. I think the time would be better spent actually working in a
museum, even at the most entry-level job. However, I do think that the few
graduate programs that combine academic training and an academic M.A. with
the museum studies curriculum are good -- one that comes to mind is at USC in
Los Angeles (although its focus is art history, not anthropology). I know
that UCLA has a great museum of cultural history (it was where I had my first
museum job!) and that many of the anthro students work or do projects with
the museum; there is also an informal museum studies program, I believe.
Hope this helps. Good luck!
Anne Farrell
Museum of Contemporary Art, San Diego
If you want to advance into museum management, however, I would recommend
formal advanced training in both museum studies and business administration
in addition to an advanced academic degree. In the current climate, a PhD
in an academic discipline is nice for a director to have, but the
versatility of business training and breadth of technical knowledge derived
from museum studies training is what will stand him/her in better stead in
the long run.
Again, just my opinion...
Julia Moore
Director of Exhibitions and Artist Services
Indianapolis Art Center
I agree with Julia about the importance of business/management training -- I
went to the Museum Management Institute in '83 (the program managed by the
Getty & AFA, held at U.C.Berkeley), and that month-long, intense experience
was (and still is, 13 years later) invaluable. Had I known I was going to
end up a development director, I would have probably tried to pursue an
M.B.A. right out of undergrad. But since I sort of tumbled into museum work,
I ended up on that "learn by doing " track, and it's turned out fine. In my
field, however, as well as in any kind of museum administration -- one can
really benefit from an M.B.A., especially with an arts or not-for-profit
focus. But I still contend that an effective track record can be equally
valuable; it just depends on the good fortune of finding a museum, a mentor,
and a situation where you can learn and grow.
Anne Farrell
MCA San Diego
(My thoughts)
The industry is changing and the requirements for museum jobs seem be be
more demanding. Additionally, there is a new breed of museum
professional that is knowledgeable in areas other than academia---i.e.,
fundraising, financials, community, etc.
Regards,
Jose
--
Jose A. Ortiz
Assistant Manager, The Cloisters
A branch of the Metropolitan Museum of Art
Tel. (212) 650-2289
I agree.
John Martinson
jpm...@bmi.net
College Place, WA