>Jim Elliott, IBM wrote:
>> Weird, they are apostrophes.
>>
>> four Model 65's, three Model 50's
>
>Of course, those apostrophes should simply be removed. This is plural
>not possessive usage.
>
It's (contraction, not plural) an obsolete convention, still
followed by many:
http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Apostrophes
# An exception can also be made for numbers and abbreviations,
although some consider this old fashioned, illogical and
unnecessary. MLA guidelines suggest that no apostrophe is
needed following numbers (as when naming a decade).
* "I bought many CD's in the 1990's." Incorrect.
* "I bought many CDs in the 1990s." Correct.
(For many years I've felt guilty for using what I now see is MLA
style.)
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to list...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Still my favorite among semi-literate yard signs: "Puppy's for sale".
No, I've never stopped to ask.....
-jc-
Sorry, apostrophes following numbers and abbreviations was the way I was
taught to punctuate in the mid-20th century. Those nuns would have my
hide if I forgot proper apostrophe placement, and that lesson doesn't
fade with time.
I'm afraid that's one new-dog trick this old dog won't be learning.
Peter
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the
message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your system.