Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Apostrophes

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Paul Gilmartin

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 12:12:29 PM11/22/09
to
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:51:55 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:

>Jim Elliott, IBM wrote:
>> Weird, they are apostrophes.
>>
>> four Model 65's, three Model 50's
>
>Of course, those apostrophes should simply be removed. This is plural
>not possessive usage.
>
It's (contraction, not plural) an obsolete convention, still
followed by many:

http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Apostrophes

# An exception can also be made for numbers and abbreviations,
although some consider this old fashioned, illogical and
unnecessary. MLA guidelines suggest that no apostrophe is
needed following numbers (as when naming a decade).

* "I bought many CD's in the 1990's." Incorrect.
* "I bought many CDs in the 1990s." Correct.

(For many years I've felt guilty for using what I now see is MLA
style.)

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to list...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Chase, John

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 7:49:58 AM11/23/09
to
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
>
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:51:55 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
>
> >Jim Elliott, IBM wrote:
> >> Weird, they are apostrophes.
> >>
> >> four Model 65's, three Model 50's
> >
> >Of course, those apostrophes should simply be removed. This is plural
> >not possessive usage.
> >
> It's (contraction, not plural) an obsolete convention, still
> followed by many:
>
> http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Apostrophes
>
> # An exception can also be made for numbers and abbreviations,
> although some consider this old fashioned, illogical and
> unnecessary. MLA guidelines suggest that no apostrophe is
> needed following numbers (as when naming a decade).
>
> * "I bought many CD's in the 1990's." Incorrect.
> * "I bought many CDs in the 1990s." Correct.
>
> (For many years I've felt guilty for using what I now see is MLA
> style.)

Still my favorite among semi-literate yard signs: "Puppy's for sale".

No, I've never stopped to ask.....

-jc-

Farley, Peter x23353

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 10:21:48 AM11/23/09
to
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 12:10 PM
> To: IBM-...@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Apostrophes
>
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:51:55 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
<Snipped>
> It's (contraction, not plural) an obsolete convention, still
> followed by many:
>
> http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Apostrophes
>
> # An exception can also be made for numbers and abbreviations,
> although some consider this old fashioned, illogical and
> unnecessary. MLA guidelines suggest that no apostrophe is
> needed following numbers (as when naming a decade).
>
> * "I bought many CD's in the 1990's." Incorrect.
> * "I bought many CDs in the 1990s." Correct.
>
> (For many years I've felt guilty for using what I now see is MLA
> style.)

Sorry, apostrophes following numbers and abbreviations was the way I was
taught to punctuate in the mid-20th century. Those nuns would have my
hide if I forgot proper apostrophe placement, and that lesson doesn't
fade with time.

I'm afraid that's one new-dog trick this old dog won't be learning.

Peter


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the
message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your system.

0 new messages