I have been spending days try to resolve this message originally I thought
it was something I had done in a PC rtn following this message
As the message in the DUMP following is
PRIMARY NOT EQUAL TO HOME
But now I am convinced that its IEAVPST that is going cross memory that
causing this message the ECB looks okay so does the ASCB
Below is the code that I use to post the Address Space the address for the
ASCB and ECB seem to be valid
I wrote a 2 small programs to test this out and it worked
If anybody has any hints I would be very grateful
L R6,MYASCB
LA R7,MYECB
POST (R7), ECB
ASCB=(R6), ASCB
LINKAGE=SYSTEM,
ECBKEY=8,
ERRET=CONT ERROR RTN
CONT DS 0H
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to list...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
In my old PC routine, I have a SAC 0 (SYSSTATE ASCENV=P) before the
XMPost
Joe Reichman wrote:
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Development Team
ISIS Information Systems Gmbh
tel: (+43) 2236 27551 570
Fax: (+43) 2236 21081
E-mail: miklos.s...@isis-papyrus.com
Info: in...@isis-papyrus.com
Hotline: +43-2236-27551-111
Visit our Website: http://www.isis-papyrus.com
---------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail is only intended for the recipient and not legally
binding. Unauthorised use, publication, reproduction or
disclosure of the content of this e-mail is not permitted.
This email has been checked for known viruses, but ISIS accepts
no responsibility for malicious or inappropriate content.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Is your PC a space-switch ?
Have you verified the PASN and HASN before the XM POST?
Have you taken an SVC dump with both the PASN and HASN included and verified the storage?
How did you locate the ASCB for the target address space?
Does the ECB really exist in the private storage (and correct key) of the address space specified by your ASCB= keyword?
S102-C is not documented in my copy of z/OS 1.10 System Codes, however I am guessing that it might be the result of some sort of program check taken while POSTing the ECB.
Rob Scott
Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 16, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Miklos Szigetvari <miklos.s...@ISIS-PAPYRUS.COM
1) I have verified PASN = HASN
By looking at PSAAOLD and control register 4 for that CPU
2) I save the traget ASCB in CSA
using PSAAOLD my control block is
chained off my SSCB (SSCTUSE)
I just look for my 4 character SSID
Identfier
3) the ECB is from my control block
in CSA didn't think that would a problem (ECB in CSA). SP 241
I know I shouldn't be setting KEY=8
for CSA (Edward Jaffe screamed at me
for that but don't think that's the problem I have a good reason for
doing that which I am willing to share)
4) The reason code 00C is documented in 1.8 (though we are running 1.9
Thankx again
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 16, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Rob Scott <RSc...@ROCKETSOFTWARE.COM>
wrote:
Brian
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-...@bama.ua.edu> wrote on 12/16/2009
01:27:13 PM:
> [image removed]
>
> Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=0000000C
>
> Joe Reichman
>
> to:
>
> IBM-MAIN
>
> 12/16/2009 01:28 PM
>
> Sent by:
>
> IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-...@bama.ua.edu>
>
> Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Thankx
Sent from my iPhone
Key8 CSA - yuk - I cannot think of any good reasons for it.
Do you have an SVC dump?
What is the PSW before you XMPOST ? (Cos you have to be one (or more) of APF/Key0-7/Sup to issue XMPOST with ASCB + ECBKEY).
Have you verified the plist passed to POST?
What does the systrace show ?
Apparently IEAVPST does like an ECB in CSA or CSA key=8
When I pointed the ECB to WS_DSECT or SP=0 private it worked
LA RX,WS_ECB
ST RX,CSA_KEY8_ECB store address
In Posted program
L RX,ASCB
LA RY,CSA_KEY8_ECB
L RY,0(,RY)
POST (RY),ASCB=(RX),ERRET=XXXX,ECBKEY=8
Thankx again
This doesn't make sense I tested this scenario with the ECB pointing to SP
241
Rob (Scott) Edward (Jaffe)
Forgot one more piece of info
The Wait occurs Under a Different Task (TCB) Then were SP 241 was obtained
The 241 was obtained Under the Main Task Before I Created the Task's (to do
the READ/WRITE) sockets
I know all virtual storage is associated with a TCB
So when I pointed the ECB to SP=0 it was obtained under TCB for which I was
doing the WAIT makes sense ???
What did you mean by
"As the message in the DUMP following is
PRIMARY NOT EQUAL TO HOME"?
POST could not care less if an ECB is in private, CSA, or SQA as along as
it is addressable from the target space. Similarly, it does not care what
the key is, as long as the key you tell it to use works.
I would guess that if the ECB truly was in CSA, that it was not key 8.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
> LA RY,CSA_KEY8_ECB
> L RY,0(,RY)
> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:08:57 -0500
> From: joere...@OPTONLINE.NET
> Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=0000000C
> To: IBM-...@bama.ua.edu
>
> I finally got it working
>
> Apparently IEAVPST does like an ECB in CSA or CSA key=8
>
> When I pointed the ECB to WS_DSECT or SP=0 private it worked
>
> LA RX,WS_ECB
> ST RX,CSA_KEY8_ECB store address
>
> In Posted program
>
> L RX,ASCB
> LA RY,CSA_KEY8_ECB
> L RY,0(,RY)
>
> POST (RY),ASCB=(RX),ERRET=XXXX,ECBKEY=8
>
>
> Thankx again
>
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/
Sent from my iPhone
Why do you think this?
Rob Scott
Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Joe Reichman
Sent: 17 December 2009 18:13
To: IBM-...@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=0000000C
And its pointer to an area in CSA and it worked the POST
WS_SP0_PRIVATE
LA RX,WS_SP0_PRIVATE
ST RX,CSA_SP241
In posted program
L RX,CSA_SP241
L RX,0(,RX)
L RY,ASCB
Post (RX),ASCB=(RY),ERRET=XXXX,ECBKEY=8
And waiting program gets posted
This is no such restriction about which TCB owns the storage of an ECB, in fact it is quite common for ECBs to be "owned" by other TCBs rather than the "waiter" TCB.
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:05:34 -0500 Rob Scott <RSc...@ROCKETSOFTWARE.COM>
wrote:
:>Joe
--
Binyamin Dissen <bdi...@dissensoftware.com>
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.
We are seeing some rather odd scrolling behaviour in the EXTEND(ON) area.
If the users scroll up and then select a row, the next DISPLAY sees that
row at the top of the screen window, even if it's the last row in the AREA
and everything below it is a blank.
Is there any way to control how a scrollable )AREA scrolls?
~~~~~~~~~~~~ Andy Robertson telephone mobile 0777 214 9545 home 01308
420797
**********************************************************************
This email is confidential and may contain copyright material of the John Lewis Partnership.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete all copies of this message.
(Please note that it is your responsibility to scan this message for viruses). Email to and from the
John Lewis Partnership is automatically monitored for operational and lawful business reasons.
**********************************************************************
John Lewis plc
Registered in England 233462
Registered office 171 Victoria Street London SW1E 5NN
Websites: http://www.johnlewis.com
http://www.waitrose.com
http://www.greenbee.com
http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk
**********************************************************************
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Rob Scott <RSc...@ROCKETSOFTWARE.COM>
wrote:
Not true.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent from my iPhone
It sounds as though the application is displaying a dynamic area? If so, the program has FULL control over what it sets the value of AREA to. In other words, it's up to the program (and not ISPF) to decide what gets displayed so you need to check what it's setting the value of AREA to.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html
> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:54:44 +0000
> From: Andy_Ro...@JOHNLEWIS.CO.UK
> Subject: ISPF - scrolling of scrollable areas on panels
> To: IBM-...@bama.ua.edu
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you�re up to on Facebook.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691816