Errors and Omissions of the CODATA and the Planck Constants
ollin
Please, consider my recent work entitled, "Errors and Omissions of the
CODATA and the Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical
Constants".
In this brief study, selected CODATA fundamental physical constants
are researched in an effort to identify the implied computational
foundations that serve as a basis for deriving the Planck constants.
The Planck constants are reverse engineered as of the CODATA
recommendations. Various Earth/matriX Tables of the Planck Constants
illustrate the terms and numerical values that derive each Planck
constant listed in the CODATA. The derivations are accomplished, not
through the CODATA symbolic formulae, but rather based upon the
fundamental physical constants.
Initially, I had hoped to understand the computational procedure that
Max Planck may have used to derive the numerical values of his
constants. During my studies, I came to distinguish how Max Planck may
have derived his values, and problems with the CODATA numerical values
for the Planck Constants. I had not expected to find any errors or
omissions in the CODATA, but that is what my research has ultimately
uncovered.
In this regard, various errors and omissions in the CODATA values are
identified and discussed in my study, a few of which are the
following:
- A numerical contradiction between Planck's constant [6.62606896] and
the other nine constants
- The omission of listing the Planck implied energy constant
[1.956084456 fractal];
- The incorrect assignment of the symbolic formula to Planck energy
[1.220892]
- An omission of an identifiable conversion constant [1.2316143]
- The failure to identify alternate constant numerical values as of
the root expressions in the key symbolic formulae depending on the
unit of measurement;
- An inconsistency in the use of constant numerical values for Planck
implied mass [ 3.387040993 and 3.487040993] in five Planck constants.
Proposals are offered for adjusting the CODATA Planck constants in
terms of their numerical values, as well as, how some of the errors
may be addressed. The omissions identified in the book speak for
themselves and suggest being included in the CODATA. Numerous other
proposals are made, all of which are based on the numerical values of
the CODATA.
Excerpts from the book have been posted on the Internet:
Thank you for your attention and I would appreciate any feedback that
you may wish to offer me in my research efforts, as that is the only
way to improve one's work.
My best,
Charles
Charles William Johnson