I have not seen the printed version of this finding that others on the
list must have seen. I have the correspondence that was sent to our
University, and it never mentions typists.
Anybody out there know something about the print reference? Mind sending
me a copy?
Diane Perreira
The University of Arizona
On Wed, 4 Oct 1995, Khaki Wunderlich wrote:
> Diane - Thanks for your clarification of the 1991
> Findings. A slightly different question - apparently the
> Finding noted failure to provide assistance typing
> papers. I have just run into this question this
> semester with a student requesting a waiver from any
> typing requirements (papers in non-typing courses).
> So far the instructors involved have been willing to
> agree to accept non-typed papers. Did OCR indicate
> that the University may have to provide or pay
> for typing services if the student is unable to type him
> or herself? What constitutes inability?
>
> For everyone - what about the student who is limited
> to typing less than 30 wpm? At what point is a course
> typed-product requirement too onerous for the
> student? 5 pages? 20 pages? Should we be
> providing a typist or should the instructor be accepting
> neat, handwritten products? I assume that any
> non-typed product is readable. But, what about the LD
> student with atrocious handwriting? So many
> questions. Any thoughts?
>
>
> Khaki Wunderlich
> Coordinator of Learning Assistance Services
> Tompkins Cortland Community College
> Dryden, New York
>
>