Thanks,
Cheryl Litman
Somerset, NJ
email: cheryl...@juno.com
On Sun, 4 Oct 1998 15:26:59 EDT Hank Ray <Hel...@aol.com> writes:
>----------------------------Original
>message----------------------------
>Hello
>
>i have been meaning to post some thoughts about underglazes at high
>temps for
>awhile....
>
>w/the recent post regarding underglazes fired to cone 5, i thought it
>might be
>interesting for some clayarters out there....
>
>underglazes are usually used at cone 04 or 06 - in low fire
>aplications...
>but, we have been using them at cone 10 reduction with very
>interesting
>results: ...the colors change quite a bit.....
>
>THIS IS WHAT WE DID:... we took bisqued stoneare cylinders and
>painted
>stripes from top to bottom with various underglazes.... then we clear
>glazed
>the bottom half of the cylinder... this enabled us to see the result
>of the
>underglaze under a clear cone 10 glaze and at cone 10 w/out a glaze...
>
>THE RESULTS WERE: ... many colors and effects that can be painted on
>bisque
>for high firing and then clear glazed....and, many underglazes by
>themselves
>produced interesting effects.. some actually looked like glossy-ish
>glazes and
>some looking like soft pale matt glazes.... some remained their
>original
>colors and some changed dramatically...
>
>i had a visiting artist from czech interested in my test results...
>she
>decided to use the underglazes on some sculptural pieces w/out an
>overlaze and
>did some wonderful things with them.....
>
>i haven't seen many people play with this... and some potters who
>don't even
>know what they (underglazes) are...
>
>pete..... just sharing...
>
>peter coates..... city art center..oklahoma city ok.....
>hel...@aol.com
>www.cityartscenter.com
>
>P.S. used them on greenware before bisque with no difference in
>effect...
>also works well (if not better) on porcelain.........
>
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>After all the uproar about checking books first, I've been afraid to ask
>this question, but here goes - why use underglazes rather than glazes
>(lowfire). What do they give in terms of application and color that you
>don't get from glazes?
>
>Thanks,
>Cheryl Litman
>Somerset, NJ
>email: cheryl...@juno.com
>
>On Sun, 4 Oct 1998 15:26:59 EDT Hank Ray <Hel...@aol.com> writes:
>>----------------------------Original
>>message----------------------------
>>Hello
>>
>>i have been meaning to post some thoughts about underglazes at high
>>temps for
>>awhile....
>>
(rest snipped for brevity)
Hi Cheryl,
I can answer this as the experience applies to me. Last year I had the
valuable experience of doing research for the underglazes that were used by
Ingrid Lilligren, Prof. of Ceramics here at Iowa State U., on a large
ceramic mural she was commissioned to make for the new Extended Learning
Facility at the Armstrong Research Farm near Atlantic, Iowa. We concocted
a recipe using equal percentages of Frit 3110, EPK, and Mason Stains, with
liquid laundry starch as the vehicle. This gave a consistency almost like
paint that allowed a long working time. Much longer than would generally
be the case with glaze. We were able to blend colors and achieve truly
"painterly" effects. Also, like paints, the after-fired color of the
stains tends to remain pretty much as it was at the time of
application--unlike glazes colored with raw oxides, which generally look
vastly different after firing. The color is uniform, opaque, and flat.
We then used a very transparent cone 04 gloss clear glaze over the top.
I'm still doing color research on these underglazes. I'd be happy to tell
you more about it, if you're interested.
Regards,
Greg Lamont
3011 Northwood Dr.
Ames, Iowa 50010-4750
515/233-3442
gdla...@iastate.edu
Toni,
( I will not tell you about the heat in Durban today, it would
upset sensitive readers!)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
After all the uproar about checking books first, I've been afraid to ask
this question, but here goes - why use underglazes rather than glazes
(lowfire). What do they give in terms of application and color that you
don't get from glazes?
Thanks,
Cheryl Litman
Somerset, NJ
email: cheryl...@juno.com
On Sun, 4 Oct 1998 15:26:59 EDT Hank Ray <Hel...@aol.com> writes:
>----------------------------Original
>message----------------------------
>Hello
>
>i have been meaning to post some thoughts about underglazes at high
>temps for
>awhile....
>
Cheryl -
Commercial underglazes are basically just engobes - clay-slip mixtures with
added fluxes and non-plastics to make them "fit" a bone-dry or bisque-fired
wares. Since they are mostly clay, they are much more refractory than a
glaze, so they tend to stay in place, even if a clear glaze over them shifts
or runs a bit. In contrast, if the designwork is done with glazes, or with
overglaze colors, if the glaze shifts the design work moves with it.
As was mentioned in an earlier post, many low-fire underglazes can be used
at high fire, but some will start to flux out as a glaze. They should still
be more stable than your average high-fire gloss glaze, and therefore should
work well by themselves or in the normal underglaze application. One must
keep in mind however, that many clear glazes will erode into the underglaze
surface quite a bit, so a thicker than normal coat may be required if one
wants dense, solid color.
Good luck -
- Vince
Vince Pitelka - vpit...@DeKalb.net
Home 615/597-5376, work 615/597-6801, fax 615/597-6803
Appalachian Center for Crafts
Tennessee Technological University
1560 Craft Center Drive, Smithville TN 37166
Debbie McDysan
Greg wrote to Cheryl:
>I can answer this as the experience applies to me. Last year I had the
>valuable experience of doing research for the underglazes that were used by
>Ingrid Lilligren, Prof. of Ceramics here at Iowa State U., on a large
>ceramic mural she was commissioned to make for the new Extended Learning
>Facility at the Armstrong Research Farm near Atlantic, Iowa. We concocted
>a recipe using equal percentages of Frit 3110, EPK, and Mason Stains, with
>liquid laundry starch as the vehicle. This gave a consistency almost like
>paint that allowed a long working time. Much longer than would generally
>be the case with glaze. We were able to blend colors and achieve truly
>"painterly" effects. Also, like paints, the after-fired color of the
>stains tends to remain pretty much as it was at the time of
>application--unlike glazes colored with raw oxides, which generally look
>vastly different after firing. The color is uniform, opaque, and flat.
>We then used a very transparent cone 04 gloss clear glaze over the top.
>I'm still doing color research on these underglazes. I'd be happy to tell
>you more about it, if you're interested.
>
Richard,
In reply to your questions:
1.) I've only applied them to bisque, but I dont see why they couldn't be
applied to greenware. Sounds like some testing is in order. 2.) I used
Sta-Flo brand. 3.) Yes. 33.3% Frit 3110, 33.3% EPK, 33.3% Mason
Stain--or 16.65% each of 2 different stains. When I mixed up the 100g.
tests, I used a "coffee measure" scoop
to measure out the laundry starch. Three scoops gave a consistency of thin
yogurt. Sorry I cant tell you how much the coffee measure scoop held.
Greg
Not sure how well this formula would work at cone 6. Some stains are prone
to burning out or changing color at high temps. The underglaze was fired
to cone 04 on an earthenware body:
65% Redart Clay
20% Hawthorne Bond fireclay (use 50 mesh to avoid white specks)
5% Ball Clay
10% Talc
add:
1% Bentonite (Mix with water first before adding other ingredients to
ensure proper
dispersal. Use a drill or Jiffy mixer.)
1/2 cup Barium Carb. per 100 lbs dry ingredients to prevent scumming.
The clear overglaze:
45% Frit 3124
25% Gerstley Borate
25% Nepeline Syenite
5% Silica
See other post today on Clayart to Richard Ramirez for more info.
Regards,