Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The last pre-war artist?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jonny Meister

unread,
Nov 26, 2006, 9:16:47 PM11/26/06
to
Was Robert Lockwood the last living artist of any significance to record
blues before we entered World War 2...? That's an amazing milestone to
pass... the origins of blues are receding into history.

-Jonny

Blues-L web site: http://www.netspace.org/~blues-l/
Archives & web interface: http://lists.netspace.org/archives/blues-l.html
NetSpace LISTSERV(R) software donated by L-Soft, Inc. http://www.lsoft.com
To unsubscribe from BLUES-L, send an email with the message UNSUBSCRIBE BLUES-L to: list...@lists.netspace.org

bluesfantom

unread,
Nov 26, 2006, 9:29:06 PM11/26/06
to
Honey Boy Edwards.

tom

Jonny Meister

unread,
Nov 26, 2006, 9:43:14 PM11/26/06
to
Honey Boy was certainly playing pre-war, but I think his first recordings
were in 1942. I believe Lockwood was the last living artist to record
"pre-war" blues..... -Jonny

At 06:28 PM 11/26/2006 -0800, you wrote:
>Honey Boy Edwards.
>
>tom
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonny Meister" <bluesan...@gmail.com>
>To: <BLU...@LISTS.NETSPACE.ORG>
>Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 6:16 PM
>Subject: The last pre-war artist?
>
>

bluesfantom

unread,
Nov 26, 2006, 10:06:59 PM11/26/06
to
Right you are. I was thinking without looking it up that he started
recording in '41, but '42 it was. My bad.

Jim Wells

unread,
Nov 26, 2006, 10:34:18 PM11/26/06
to
Tampa Red was working back then...Billy Holiday too. Or I am missing
someting here. There were many more as well.

Rgds...Jim

Jonny Meister

unread,
Nov 26, 2006, 10:42:58 PM11/26/06
to
Maybe I worded it poorly-- I was saying that Lockwood was the last
surviving artist who had recorded pre-war at the time of his death last
Tuesday.

-Jonny

At 09:33 PM 11/26/2006 -0600, you wrote:
>Tampa Red was working back then...Billy Holiday too. Or I am missing
>someting here. There were many more as well.
>
>Rgds...Jim
>

>----- Original Message ----- From: "bluesfantom" <blues...@centurytel.net>
>To: <BLU...@LISTS.NETSPACE.ORG>
>Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 9:06 PM

Jim Wells

unread,
Nov 26, 2006, 11:24:44 PM11/26/06
to
I understand now -- sorry. You may well be right although wasn't Louis
Jordan aound then? Also I'd include Louis Armstrong, but that's just me.

Terry Groff

unread,
Nov 26, 2006, 11:55:33 PM11/26/06
to
Jim,

I think you're missing the gist of this post.

Who is still alive that recorded before the war? Jonny is
suggesting that Lockwood may be one of the last. Who is left?

Terry

Gregory Johnson

unread,
Nov 27, 2006, 1:19:40 AM11/27/06
to
According to All Music Guide, Homesick James Williamson did recording for RCA Victor in 1937, though it doesn't give specifics beyond that. Whether he would be considered an artist of significance at that time period may be questionable though.

Greg
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonny Meister<mailto:bluesan...@gmail.com>
To: BLU...@LISTS.NETSPACE.ORG<mailto:BLU...@LISTS.NETSPACE.ORG>
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 6:16 PM
Subject: The last pre-war artist?


Was Robert Lockwood the last living artist of any significance to record
blues before we entered World War 2...? That's an amazing milestone to
pass... the origins of blues are receding into history.

-Jonny

Blues-L web site: http://www.netspace.org/~blues-l/<http://www.netspace.org/~blues-l/>
Archives & web interface: http://lists.netspace.org/archives/blues-l.html<http://lists.netspace.org/archives/blues-l.html>
NetSpace LISTSERV(R) software donated by L-Soft, Inc. http://www.lsoft.com<http://www.lsoft.com/>
To unsubscribe from BLUES-L, send an email with the message UNSUBSCRIBE BLUES-L to: list...@lists.netspace.org<mailto:list...@lists.netspace.org>

Scott

unread,
Nov 27, 2006, 2:43:58 AM11/27/06
to
That's an interesting question.

Homesick may claim to have recorded in 1937, but if that's true, no copy
of any record has been found and no record of it exists in any of the
standard discographies.

Honeyboy may sneak in on a technicality since his recordings are listed in
Blues & Gospel Records 1890-1943, which is generally accepted as the "pre-
war discography", but none of those 1942 recordings for the LOC were
commercially released until many years later. His first commercial
release came in the 1950s.

I think an argument could also be made that Lockwood wasn't really a
significant pre-war blues artist either. His one pre-war session in 1941
couldn't made much of an impact at the time, otherwise it wouldn't have
been 10 years before his next session.

IMHO, the last surviving pre-war artist of any major significance was
Henry Townsend, who passed away a few months ago.

I'd guess that if there was anyone left from the pre-war blues recording
era, it must be someone who played a minor or supporting role on someone
else's recordings, and who hasn't been involved in music in many years.

Scott

c. n.

unread,
Nov 27, 2006, 5:13:23 AM11/27/06
to
>From: Jonny Meister <bluesan...@gmail.com>

>Was Robert Lockwood the last living artist of any significance to record
>blues before we entered World War 2...? That's an amazing milestone to
>pass... the origins of blues are receding into history.
>
>-Jonny


Maybe the faces are, but (sadly) many of the underlying causes are still
here among us. We'll not list the known ones, for fear that a large tract of
the new breed of gentrified blues musicians and fans don't become offended,
or made uneasy. What say Lovie, lets all meet on the lido deck for
crumpets and shuffles. . .

Relax. I'm just kidding. I can't stand crumpets. Besides, it looks like
history is stepping in and helping out....with new bench marks/wars. They
say the times, the times they are a'changing. (ok, if you don't count the
last decade of millionaire senators blocking a federal minimum wage increase
for the poorest workers among us, or what happened to Harold Ford during his
recent campaign).
chuck
chuck

_________________________________________________________________
Stay up-to-date with your friends through the Windows Live Spaces friends
list.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mk

No Name Available

unread,
Nov 27, 2006, 1:51:38 PM11/27/06
to
I always laugh when I read about "significant" artists. What the hell does
that mean? I memorized and copied every Lockwood lick ever recorded. He sure
was significant in my life. I have yet to read a "significant" blues
analysis.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott" <check...@YAHOO.COM>
To: <BLU...@LISTS.NETSPACE.ORG>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 2:34 AM
Subject: Re: The last pre-war artist?

Joel Fritz

unread,
Nov 27, 2006, 2:16:20 PM11/27/06
to
I think significant in the sense of popularity and influence. Robert
Lockwood was a significant post-war artist. His pre-war work wasn't
well known.

--
It's never too late to do something your parents didn't want you to do.
When that time comes Barrelhouse Solly will be there for you. He cares.


Tunes: http://www.myspace.com/barrelhousesolly
Fractious felines: http://ratemykitten.com/my/?gallery=willie_mctell

Gregory Johnson

unread,
Nov 27, 2006, 4:20:04 PM11/27/06
to
I only stated that Homesick may or may not have been significant at the time
because the reference did not lead to much examples (actually none) of
recorded material which was the topic. He did not really become truly
involved with recording until 1950 and beyond. The same was true of Pinetop.
He was certainly around, but didn't really record until 1950, well after the
Pre-War period.

Greg


>From: No Name Available <lou...@verizon.net>
>Reply-To: lou...@verizon.net
>To: BLU...@LISTS.NETSPACE.ORG
>Subject: Re: The last pre-war artist?
>Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:46:35 -0500
>
>I always laugh when I read about "significant" artists. What the hell does
>that mean? I memorized and copied every Lockwood lick ever recorded. He
>sure was significant in my life. I have yet to read a "significant" blues
>analysis.

Blues-L web site: http://www.netspace.org/~blues-l/

Scott

unread,
Nov 27, 2006, 5:17:26 PM11/27/06
to
Thanks Joel - my point exactly. Lockwood's pre-war session didn't signify
any changes or impact on the music of the day, or any stylistic departure
from what had come before it. It was about as important in its time as a
first CD release by a typical local blues bar band is today.

Examples of significant pre-war blues artists would be Tampa Red, Roosevelt
Sykes, Sonny Boy Williamson, Charlie Patton, Memphis Minnie, et al. These
people were successful and influential on the music of the day, and their
records had an expanding ripple effect on the blues music of the day, and
on the music that followed it. They "signified" specific stylistic and
historical markers in pre-war blues - that's why they were "significant".
That can't be said of Lockwood's pre-war session.

None of this is meant to take anything away from Lockwood's importance on
blues in the post-war era. I'm a huge fan, own almost everything he ever
recorded, paid good money to see him many times, interviewed him, etc. He
was unquestionably an important contributor to the history and development
of post-war blues. He was not a particularly important pre-war blues
artist, no matter how you slice it.

Scott

On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:01:46 -0800, Joel Fritz <willie...@comcast.net>
wrote:

>I think significant in the sense of popularity and influence. Robert
>Lockwood was a significant post-war artist. His pre-war work wasn't
>well known.
>
>No Name Available wrote:

>> I always laugh when I read about "significant" artists. What the hell
>> does that mean? I memorized and copied every Lockwood lick ever
>> recorded. He sure was significant in my life. I have yet to read a
>> "significant" blues analysis.
>>

>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott" <check...@YAHOO.COM>
>> To: <BLU...@LISTS.NETSPACE.ORG>
>> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 2:34 AM

>> Subject: Re: The last pre-war artist?
>>
>>

>Blues-L web site: http://www.netspace.org/~blues-l/
>Archives & web interface: http://lists.netspace.org/archives/blues-l.html
>NetSpace LISTSERV(R) software donated by L-Soft, Inc.
http://www.lsoft.com
>To unsubscribe from BLUES-L, send an email with the message UNSUBSCRIBE
BLUES-L to: list...@lists.netspace.org

>=========================================================================

Steve Hoffman

unread,
Nov 27, 2006, 8:02:26 PM11/27/06
to
Not to beat this point into the ground about whether Robert Lockwood was
a "significant pre-war artist" or not (and I basically agree with the
posts of Scott and Joel on this subject) . . . but here's one other angle:

The one really significant thing Robert Lockwood did early on was that
he and Sonny Boy Williamson II began broadcasting "King Biscuit Time" on
KFFA, Helena, Arkansas starting on November 21, 1941. That show was a
significant and influential part of blues history -- thousands listened
to it throughout the Delta (on both the Arkansas and Mississippi sides
of the Mississippi River), including many future blues stars. So
Lockwood's role in blues history as a significant and influential
contributor begins, in my view, on that date .... which was just a few
weeks before Pearl Harbor and before the U.S. entered the war.

Whether that makes him "pre-war" or not is a matter of semantics.
Besides, it never is clear (at least not to me) what category the years
1941-45 fit -- i.e., the years during which the US was in WWII -- blues
history of those years isn't "pre-war" OR "post-war," it's
"DURING-war"! (Or "post-pre-war but pre-post-war"!)

-Steve Hoffman

0 new messages