Bangla 2nd Paper Suggestion

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Brandi Wendelberger

unread,
Aug 5, 2024, 6:26:33 AM8/5/24
to biovelege
SSCBangla 2nd Paper Short Suggestion 2018. SSC Exam Bangla 2nd Paper Final Suggestion 2018 has been publishing jobsresultbd.com. All Education Board Bangla Second Paper Full and Final Suggestion 2018 found from here. SSC Suggestion 2018 All Subject also found from this site. SSC Bangla 2nd Paper Suggestion 2018 are most important SSC All Candidate of Education Board of Bangladesh. I Hope this will be Common for Your SSC Exam 2018. Jobsresultbd.com Sharing SSC Bangla Second Paper Suggestion 2018 for you. I hope this Suggestion will be helpful for your SSC Exam. This is All Education Board in Bangladesh Bangla 2nd Paper SSC Exam Suggestion and Question Patterns 2018.

SSC Exam Suggestion 2018 has been Publishing jobsresultbd.com. SSC Suggestion 2018 Bangla Second paper. This is helpful for all Education Board in Bangladesh. quickly collect your SSC Bangla 2nd paper Exam suggestion 2018. Bangla 2nd Paper SSC Exam Suggestion and Question Patterns 2018.


We are Publishing Bangladesh all Exam Suggestion, This time publish SSC English 1st Paper Short Suggestion 2018 and Others Education Related Information by Our Website at bdnucleus.wordpress.com com and also Our Facebook Page. Like Our Facebook Fan Page to Get Updated News.


We know that in HSC Bangla first paper exam every year students get very good results by mastering different suggestions. For which many are tensed before the exam and search various websites for final suggestions. Dear Exam Aspirants Considering you today we are preparing complete suggestion for Bangla First Paper Final Size through our website. We hope that with this suggestion all of you will get good result in exam because we are hopeful that you will get 80% to 85% common with our suggestion. So Master our suggestions to get good results, inshallah you can fulfill your dreams.


Finally, I am going to leave this article by wishing all the HSC candidates good results. Dear Exam Candidates Since the exam will start from 30th, if there is no danger then the exams will continue in phases. Along with the examination, we will present the suggestions of each subject and as soon as the examination is over, we will appear before you with the article related to the solution, Inshallah. So visit our website regularly for suggestions and question solutions.


PONE-D-22-06449Lifestyle risk factors and metabolic markers of cardiovascular diseases in Bangladeshi rural-to-urban male migrants compared with their non-migrant siblings: a sibling-pair comparative studyPLOS ONE


Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 04 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plo...@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.


Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript: A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.


If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.


If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: -guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at _medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.


2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see -availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.


a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.


b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see -availability#loc-recommended-repositories.


The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.


PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.


Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)


Reviewer #1: The reviewed manuscript is based on original data, very actual and includes results of very interesting research topic. As indicates the title of the manuscript, the results of the manuscript are based only on the examination data of male sibling-pairs. Therefore I recommend indicate in the aim of the manuscript that only male sibling-pair data were analyzed and exclude from the Method section text and other parts of the manuscript, in which female sibling-pair selection, numbers of female sibling-pairs the exclusion criteria (for example, pregnant women) (line 153) and so on, were mentioned. You mention in the text of the manuscript term "CVDs risk factors": physical inactivity, smoking, overweight and obesity, abdominal obesity, low HDL. I did not find in the section Methods described how those factors were determined and classified. The only definition of hypertension and diabetes are presented (lines 329-330). So, please include the description of the methods of the examination and classification of the CVDs risk factors into the Methods section. Maybe you presented the mentioned description of the determination and classification of the CVDs risk factors in your previous publications: so, you could indicate such publication in the list of the references instead of including of additional paragraph into the section Methods of the manuscript.


Reviewer #2: This is an interesting work on male (in-country) rural-to-urban migrants on a major public health issue in Bangladesh, NCD risk factors. This study has shown how exposure of the people to an urban environment (physical and others) gradually develops acquire risk factors to develop CVD in future compared to their rural sibs. This is probably done for the first time in Bangladesh. The authors deserve special felicitation for this milestone piece.


5. Line 185: Reference has been made to the Supplementary file about the sampling technique. It could be mentioned briefly here also so that readers can understand it without reading the Supplementary file.


10. Table 1: Treatment history for diabetes and hypertension could be one of the determinants of their blood glucose and blood pressure levels. This has been mentioned by the authors in the Discussion section. Can we have the treatment history data here?


12. Table 4: It has been inadvertently labeled as Table 1. All ORs and their confidence intervals could be presented up to one decimal point. This will not lose any information, but the Table will appear clear and succinct. Please consider this for Table 2 also.


[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]


While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at fig...@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.


1 This is an interesting work on male (in-country) rural-to-urban migrants on a major public health issue in Bangladesh, NCD risk factors. This study has shown how exposure of the people to an urban environment (physical and others) gradually develops acquire risk factors to develop CVD in future compared to their rural sibs. This is probably done for the first time in Bangladesh. The authors deserve special felicitation for this milestone piece. We thank the reviewer for appreciating our work and indeed it is the first of its kind in Bangladesh.

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages