Spring 2009 Meetings
Oliver Ruebenacker
Spring 2009 meetings according to schedule would be the following
Tuesdays, 3pm - 6pm, Stata Center, MIT:
February: 10, 24
March: 10, 24, 31
April: 14, 21
Please let me know, if you would like to suggest to add, move or
cancel a meeting.
Regular attendees: Please let me know if you can not make it to any
of these meetings.
Take care
Oliver
--
Oliver Ruebenacker, Computational Cell Biologist
BioPAX Integration at Virtual Cell (http://vcell.org/biopax)
Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling
http://www.oliver.curiousworld.org
Michel Dumontier
Oliver Ruebenacker
Correction: April 28 would be a meeting, too, so Tuesdays, 3pm -
6pm, Stata Center, MIT:
February: 10, 24
March: 10, 24, 31
April: 14, 21, 28
Take care
Oliver
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Oliver Ruebenacker <cur...@gmail.com> wrote:
Alan Ruttenberg
> 6pm, Stata Center, MIT:
>
> February: 10, 24
> March: 10, 24, 31
All ok.
> April: 14, 21, 28
14, 21 probably OK. 28 not.
Oliver Ruebenacker
Next meeting would be February 24, but Alan can't make it. Would you
like to: (1) keep or (2) skip or (3) postpone to March 3?
Take care
Oliver
Alan Ruttenberg
-Alan
andrea splendiani (RRes-Roth)
Was there a conf call last Tuesday ? I was online but didn't see
anybody.
I'm fine with both dates, if somebody is interested in participating.
Can also be a chat/call via Skype.
Perhaps we should also review our plans for these meetings, as we are
setting dates for the months to come, but we can hardly respect them.
Perhaps we should decrease the meeting rate (and add some TODO in the
while), or we can take a more informal approach.
Ciao,
Andrea
JSL913
Joanne
Oliver Ruebenacker
OK, so how about having a purely virtual meeting on February 24 and
the next real meeting on March 10?
Andrea: I was online, too, and invited you for a chat, but got no
reply. But the last meeting was rather brief anyway.
I am happy to review our plans. To me, planing further ahead means
having more time to decide whether a meeting will take place or not,
and whether we want to move it. That meetings do not take place as
originally scheduled seems not a problem to me.
Although we have fewer meeting than scheduled, this does not seem to
indicate to me that we should schedule fewer meetings, because even if
we schedule fewer meetings, we might still have fewer meetings than
scheduled. At least as I understand it, people can not come to
meetings because they collide with something else, not because there
are too many of them. Presumably, if we were planing one meeting per
month, we would still have such collisions.
There are alternatives to having a pattern (such as 2nd, 4th and
last Tuesday per month). In the past, we planned from meeting to
meeting, but that made it tight if we wanted to have the next meeting
next week (because we need feedback, then get a room, then announce).
We can try to finalize, at each meeting, the following two meetings.
Or, I could send a list of all Tuesdays and ask, which are available.
What do you think?
Take care
Oliver