In molecule pages, we call the above diagram as NetworkMap/Network
rather than Pathway.
It is not like a Pathway in Reactome, KEGG, NCI-PID, BioCyc etc.
Is it possible (does it make sense!) to have a super-class Network to
Pathway with networkComponents!.
Thanks,
Ashok
Igor Rodchenkov
unread,
Aug 27, 2010, 2:05:12 PM8/27/10
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to biopax-...@googlegroups.com
Hi,
I think, "network" is too general name, it's about everything (more uncertain than "pathway"; so I would keep it simple, i.e., just list interactions without forcing them in a pathway, and let analyst figure out what is that mean...
E.g., different "networks" can be simply different OWL files.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to biopax-...@googlegroups.com
Hi Ashok, You can use the Pathway class to store a set of interactions in pathwayComponent. The pathway can be named e.g. "WASH Network". This is probably the best way to keep a set of interactions together and give it a name. Otherwise, you could as Igor says, but you will not be able to name the network (the file name will not be stable).