The magnitude of the lod score and where it is high vs. low depends on a
number of factors:
1) Heterogeneity. There can be genetic heterogeneity, and even slight
nuances in how a sample was obtained can affect ones ability to detect
linkage at one site vs. another. Differences in the phenotype used to
collect the sample would be one indicator of possible heterogeneity.
2) The "Suarez" effect. When there is heterogeneity, replication of a
result often requires a larger sample size than the initial finding,
because the initial report is the best of several possiblities, while
replication requires a strong score in the same location. Are there any
hints of positive lod scores at the second site across studies?
3) Bad luck or other "problems" with the analysis. One or both could be
wrong. There are lots of ways one can end up with false positive results,
some of which result from bad (naive) applications of the analysis
methods, and some of which simply reflect badk luck.
************************************************************************
Ellen M. Wijsman COURIER DELIVERY ADDRESS ONLY:
Research Professor Ellen M. Wijsman
Div. of Medical Genetics and 1914 N 34th St., suite 209
Dept. Biostatistics Seattle, WA 98103
BOX 357720, University of Washington (Note: Use this address
Seattle, WA 98195-7720 EXACTLY as given above, and
phone: (206) 543-8987 use ONLY for courier delivery!!!)
fax: (206) 616-1973 email: wij...@u.washington.edu
web page: http://faculty.washington.edu/wijsman
*************************************************************************