Re: [biogo-dev] biogo.graph traverses

[Dan Kortschak]

Hi Tom,

What are you interested in? biogo.graph really needs some work; the API
is pretty poor at the moment because I was never happy with the approach
that I was taking with types.

Short term aspirations for the package include:
* Directed and undirected graphs - preferably as different types
that satisfy different interfaces (I wasn't clear on how to
approach this).
* Better documentation.
* Directed cycle detection.
* Clean up API (possibly breaking compatibility).

Since I'm not sure about how things are going with this, I don't see the
API as fixed, so if there are good reasons to break the API, then that
can be discussed.

welcome
Dan

On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 14:39 -0700, Thomas Zaragoza wrote:
> I'm interested in contributing to the project. I see you've completed
> BFS and DFS already. Are there other things you wish to have
> implemented in traverse.go? Please let me know!
>