Dear Nick,
I'm using your great program BioGeoBEARS and have a question about stratified analyses. In my analysis I have defined 9 regions whereof one didn't appear before 140 mya (the whole tree is dated to 350 mya). This means that I have two strata: 0-140 mya and 140-400 mya.
This is what is output in the terminal:
===================================================================
1- top: 0, bot: 140, rel_bot: 140
2- top: 140, bot: 400, rel_bot: 260
Read 11 items
Read 576 items
Read 11 items
Read 576 items
bears_optim_run() note: overall states_list has 256 states/ranges. In stratum #1 (140-400 mya), states_list_for_this_stratum has 256 states/ranges, due to areas_allowed and/or areas_adjacency matrices. See BioGeoBEARS_run_object$lists_of_states_lists_0based.
bears_optim_run() note: overall states_list has 256 states/ranges. In stratum #2 (400-Inf mya), states_list_for_this_stratum has 163 states/ranges, due to areas_allowed and/or areas_adjacency matrices. See BioGeoBEARS_run_object$lists_of_states_lists_0based.
===================================================================
I think "1- top: ... etc. " looks good, but I wonder why it outputs "In stratum #1 (140-400 mya)" ..."In stratum #2 (400-Inf mya)" further down, because that doesn't sound right?
And a second, connected question:
In my stratified analysis I have a timeperiod-file and an areas-allowed-file. I haven't included a manual_dispersal_multipliers-file. In my analysis I have put the relative
probability of dispersal between each region to 1 all over (i.e. the default settings) for both time strata, and then I figured it would be enough just to include an areas-allowed-file for the stratified analysis. I compared my case to the one in this example (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/biogeobears/XXaJqmI232o).
Have I set up my analysis correctly (at least it runs ...)?
Thanks a lot for your help!
XXX